Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation
Tóm tắt
Correlation in the broadest sense is a measure of an association between variables. In correlated data, the change in the magnitude of 1 variable is associated with a change in the magnitude of another variable, either in the same (positive correlation) or in the opposite (negative correlation) direction. Most often, the term correlation is used in the context of a linear relationship between 2 continuous variables and expressed as Pearson product-moment correlation. The Pearson correlation coefficient is typically used for jointly normally distributed data (data that follow a bivariate normal distribution). For nonnormally distributed continuous data, for ordinal data, or for data with relevant outliers, a Spearman rank correlation can be used as a measure of a monotonic association. Both correlation coefficients are scaled such that they range from –1 to +1, where 0 indicates that there is no linear or monotonic association, and the relationship gets stronger and ultimately approaches a straight line (Pearson correlation) or a constantly increasing or decreasing curve (Spearman correlation) as the coefficient approaches an absolute value of 1. Hypothesis tests and confidence intervals can be used to address the statistical significance of the results and to estimate the strength of the relationship in the population from which the data were sampled. The aim of this tutorial is to guide researchers and clinicians in the appropriate use and interpretation of correlation coefficients.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Nishimura, 2016, The amount of fluid given during surgery that leaks into the interstitium correlates with infused fluid volume and varies widely between patients., Anesth Analg, 123, 925, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001505
Kim, 2016, Morphine suppresses lung cancer cell proliferation through the interaction with opioid growth factor receptor: an in vitro and human lung tissue study., Anesth Analg, 123, 1429, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001293
Mukaka, 2012, Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research., Malawi Med J, 24, 69
Porter, 1999, Misuse of correlation and regression in three medical journals., J R Soc Med, 92, 123, 10.1177/014107689909200306
Schober, 2017, What do anesthesiologists know about p values, confidence intervals, and correlations: a pilot survey., Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2017, 4201289
Rodgers, 1988, Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient., Am Stat, 42, 59, 10.2307/2685263
Nefzger, 1957, The needless assumption of normality in Pearson’s r., Am Psychol, 12, 623, 10.1037/h0048216
Binder, 1959, Considerations of the place of assumptions in correlational analysis., Am Psychol, 14, 504, 10.1037/h0048094
Kowalski, 1972, On the effects of non-normality on the distribution of the sample product-moment correlation coefficient., J R Stat Soc, 21, 1
Vetter, 2017, Fundamentals of research data and variables: the devil is in the details., Anesth Analg, 125, 1375, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002370
Caruso, 1997, Empirical size, coverage, and power of confidence intervals for Spearman’s Rho., Educ Psychol Meas, 57, 637, 10.1177/0013164497057004009
Kwak, 2017, Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and outliers., Korean J Anesthesiol, 70, 407, 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.407
Bland, 1995, Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 1–correlation within subjects., BMJ, 310, 446, 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.446
Bland, 1995, Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 2–correlation between subjects., BMJ, 310, 633, 10.1136/bmj.310.6980.633
Overholser, 2008, Biostatistics primer: part 2., Nutr Clin Pract, 23, 76, 10.1177/011542650802300176
Schober, 2018;126:1068–1072, Statistical significance versus clinical importance of observed effect sizes: what do P values and confidence intervals really represent?, Anesth Analg, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002798
Mascha, 2018, Significance, errors, power, and sample size: the blocking and tackling of statistics., Anesth Analg, 126, 691, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002741
Ozer, 1985, Correlation and the coefficient of determination., Psychol Bull, 97, 307, 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.307
Vetter, 2017, Magic mirror, on the wall-which is the right study design of them all? Part II., Anesth Analg, 125, 328, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002140
Bland, 1986, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement., Lancet, 1, 307, 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8