Correct recognition and management of anaphylaxis: not much change over a decade

Postgraduate Medical Journal - Tập 91 Số 1071 - Trang 3-7 - 2015
Benjamin Plumb1, Philip Bright1, Mark Gompels1, David Joe Unsworth1
1North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT Background Anaphylaxis is increasing in incidence. This potentially fatal condition requires immediate intramuscular adrenaline as a vital part of early treatment. A 2002 survey of UK Senior House Officers showed a lack of knowledge regarding the recognition and management of anaphylaxis. Since then major changes in medical education and updated national guidelines have aimed to ensure that doctors can recognise and treat anaphylaxis appropriately. Objectives To determine current knowledge concerning the recognition and management of anaphylaxis among junior doctors compared to their predecessors. Methods Using the same methodology as in 2002, we asked 68 Foundation doctors to read five clinical scenarios potentially suggesting anaphylaxis and indicate how they would respond to each case. Their results were compared to those of Senior House Officers in 2002. Results 68 of 107 (64%) junior doctors completed the questionnaire. All recognised the need for adrenaline in anaphylaxis, but only 74% selected the correct intramuscular route, and 34% the correct route and dose. 82% of junior doctors would inappropriately give adrenaline to the patient who had inhaled a foreign body (case 2). A higher percentage of the 2013 cohort indicated the correct route and dose of adrenaline in anaphylaxis than their 2002 colleagues. However, a greater percentage also selected adrenaline treatment inappropriately in non-anaphylactic case scenarios. Conclusions Despite updated guidelines, junior doctors continue to have poor knowledge about the recognition and management of anaphylaxis, with some still considering inappropriate intravenous adrenaline. More effort should be given to the recognition of anaphylaxis in early medical training.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Department of Health, 2006, A review of services for allergy. The epidemiology, demand for, and provision of treatment and effectiveness of clinical interventions

Pumphrey, 2000, Lessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions, Clin Exp Allergy, 30, 1144, 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00864.x

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Anaphylaxis: Assessment to confirm an anaphylactic episode and the decision to refer after emergency treatment for a suspected anaphylactic episode

Gompels, 2002, Proposed use of adrenaline (epinephrine) in anaphylaxis and related conditions: a study of senior house officers starting accident and emergency posts, Postgrad Med J, 78, 416, 10.1136/pmj.78.921.416

Adiga, 2008, Treatment of anaphylaxis in adults: a questionnaire survey, Online J Health Allied Sci, 7, 6

Jose, 2007, Survey of the use of epinephrine (adrenaline) for anaphylaxis by junior hospital doctors, Postgrad Med J, 83, 610, 10.1136/pgmj.2007.059097

Droste, 2012, Anaphylaxis: lack of hospital doctors’ knowledge of adrenaline (epinephrine) administration in adults could endanger patients’ safety, Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol, 44, 122

Thain, 2007, Treatment of anaphylaxis in adults: results of a survey of doctors at Dunedin Hospital, New Zealand, N Z Med J, 120, U2492

Foundation Programme Curriculum, 2012, The UK foundation programme curriculum

Johnston, 2003, Adrenaline given outside the context of life threatening allergic reactions, BMJ, 326, 589, 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.589

Resuscitation Council UK, Advanced Life Support Course website

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Postgraduate Medical Journal

Tập 91 Số 1071

3-7

Thông tin tác giả