Corporate social responsibility communication in the ICT sector: digital issues, greenwashing, and materiality

Jordan Famularo1
1University of California, Berkeley, Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity, Berkeley, USA

Tóm tắt

Digitalization brings with it new social and governance issues and heightened responsibility, particularly for corporations. In recent years, society has demanded more transparency from companies about digital technology practices, oversight, and impacts. One sector that sharpens the view on these dynamics is information and communication technology (ICT). This study introduces for the first time an examination of corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse on digital issues among large ICT firms by using signaling theory to analyze a broad set of media (sustainability, ESG, CSR, integrated, impact, purpose, consolidated management, and annual reports as well as issue briefs and webpages). It clarifies how ICT firms present materiality—a reporting concept associated with fair representation and relevance of information—in their CSR reporting on digital topics. It then discusses implications for greenwashing and makes recommendations for improving disclosure credibility.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abukari, A. J., & Abdul-Hamid, I. K. (2018). Corporate social responsibility reporting in the telecommunications sector in Ghana. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility,3(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0025-9 Accenture. (2022). 2022 360° Value report. Adams, C. A. (2008). A commentary on: corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,21(3), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863950 Adomako, S., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: the moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management,29(5), 1414–1423. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2278 Alibaba. (2018). ESG report 2018. Alibaba Cloud. (2021). Sustainability report 2021. Allen, M. W., & Craig, C. A. (2016). Rethinking corporate social responsibility in the age of climate change: a communication perspective. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility,1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0002-8 Alphabet. (n.d.). Investor relations sustainability & related information. https://abc.xyz/investor/other/sustainability-and-related-information/. Accessed 13 June 2022. Amazon. (2022). Notice of 2022 annual meeting of shareholders & proxy statement. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000110465922045572/tm223357-5_def14a.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. América Móvil. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Apple. (2022a). 2022 ESG report. Apple. (2022b). ESG index. AT&T. (n.d.a). ESG material issues assessment. https://about.att.com/csr/home/reporting/stakeholder-engagement.html. Accessed 13 June 2022. AT&T. (n.d.b). Social responsibility report library & archive. https://about.att.com/csr/home/reporting/library.html. Accessed 13 June 2022. AT&T. (2022). ESG summary. Baumüller, J., & Sopp, K. (2022). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research,23(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114 Bazillier, R., & Vauday, J. (2009). CSR and greenwashing. In P. Crifo & J. P. Ponssard (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: from compliance to opportunity? (pp. 93–108). Ecole Polytechnique. Bednárová, M., & Serpeninova, Y. (2023). Corporate digital responsibility: bibliometric landscape – chronological literature review. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research,23, 1–18. Bell, R. G., Moore, C. B., & Al-Shammari, H. A. (2008). Country of origin and foreign IPO legitimacy: understanding the role of geographic scope and insider ownership. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,32, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00221.x Bellucci, M., Simoni, L., Acuti, D., & Manetti, G. (2019). Stakeholder engagement and dialogic accounting: empirical evidence in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,32, 1467–1499. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2017-3158 Beske, F., Haustein, E., & Lorson, P. C. (2020). Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,11(1), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0343 Bloemendal, M. (2021). On the advent of environmental, social and governance reporting and its intersection with privacy. Journal of Data Protection & Privacy,5(1), 39–49. Boiral, O., & Henri, J. F. (2017). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business & Society,56(2), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576134 Bolt, R., & Tregidga, H. (2023). ‘Materiality is …’: sensemaking and sensegiving through storytelling. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,36(1), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2021-5314 Bonsón, E., Bednárová, M., & Perea, D. (2023). Disclosures about algorithmic decision making in the corporate reports of Western European companies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems,48, 100596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100596 Bowen, F., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: the importance of what we say and do. Organization & Environment,27(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614537078 Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2013). ‘1L=10L for Africa’: corporate social responsibility and the transformation of bottled water into a ‘consumer activist’ commodity. Discourse and Society,25(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513503536 Brennan, N. M., & Gray, S. J. (2005). The impact of materiality: accounting’s best kept secret. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance,1, 1–31. Rpt. (2007). The ICFAI Journal of Accounting Research 4(1), 61–84. Calabrese, A., Costa, R., & Rosati, F. (2015). A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Accounting Forum,39(4), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2015.06.002 Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production,121, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005 Calace, D. (2019). Materiality: from accounting to sustainability and the SDGs. In W. L. Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Responsible consumption and production, encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals (pp. 489–500). Springer. Carpenter, B. W., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1992). Early debt extinguishment transactions and auditor materiality judgments: a bounded rationality perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society,17(8), 709–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90001-9 Carpenter, B. W., Dirsmith, M. W., & Gupta, P. P. (1994). Materiality judgments and audit firm culture: social-behavioural and political perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society,19(4–5), 355–380. Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,9, 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.6 Charter Communications. (2022). 2022 Environmental, social and governance report. Chatterji, A., & Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review,48, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166337 China Telecommunications. (2021). 2021 Corporate social responsibility report. China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. China Mobile Communications. (2022). 2022 Sustainability report. Cisco Systems. (n.d.). ESG reporting hub. https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/about/csr/esg-hub.html. Accessed 13 May 2023. Cisco Systems. (2022). 2022 Cisco purpose report. Cisi, M., Del Baldo, M., Marelli, A., Ricci, F., & Scafarto, V. (2022). Non-financial disclosure and materiality: exploring the role of CFOs. In L. Cinquini & F. De Luca (Eds.), Non-financial disclosure and integrated reporting (pp. 445–475). Springer International Publishing. Comcast. (2022a). 2022 Impact report. Comcast. (2022b). June 2022 SASB report. Compal Electronics. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: a review and assessment. Journal of Management,37(1), 39–67. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2011). Managing corporate social responsibility: a communication approach. Wiley-Blackwell. Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Accounting, Organisations and Society,32, 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001 Coupland, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as argument on the web. Journal of Business Ethics,65, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1953-y Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies,53(7), 1223–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12196 Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852 Delgado-Ceballos, J., Ortiz-De-Mandojana, N., Antolín-López, R., & Montiel, I. (2023). Connecting the sustainable development goals to firm-level sustainability and ESG factors: The need for double materiality. Business Research Quarterly,26(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444221140919 Dell. (2022). FY2022 Environmental, social and governance report. Deutsche Telekom. (2021). Corporate responsibility report 2021. Dhanesh, G. S. (2015). Why corporate social responsibility? An analysis of drivers of CSR in India. Management Communication Quarterly,29, 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914545496 Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews,12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x Dubbink, W., Graafland, J., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2008). CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organizations. Journal of Business Ethics,82(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9893-y Edgley, C. (2014). A genealogy of accounting materiality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting,25(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.06.001 Edgley, C., Jones, M. J., & Atkins, J. (2015). The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting asssurance: a field study approach. The British Accounting Review,47(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.11.001 Ellerup Nielsen, A., & Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: a legitimacy perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal,23(4), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0042 Ervits, I. (2021). CSR reporting by Chinese and Western MNEs: patterns combining formal homogenization and substantive differences. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility,6(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00060-y Ettinger, A., Grabner-Kräuter, S., Okazaki, S., & Terlutter, R. (2021). The desirability of CSR communication versus greenhushing in the hospitality industry: the customers’ perspective. Journal of Travel Research,60(3), 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520930087 European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2022). [Draft] European sustainability reporting standard S6: affected communities. https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2fsites%2fwebpublishing%2fSiteAssets%2fESRS%2520S6%2520on%2520Affected%2520communities.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2022. European Union. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019R2088. Accessed 13 May 2023. European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464. Accessed 13 May 2023. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Longman. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., León, R., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2021). Sustainability materiality matrices in doubt: may prioritizations of aspects overestimate environmental performance? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,64(3), 432–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1766427 Fischer, E., & Reuber, R. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unfamiliar: the challenges of reputation formation facing new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,31, 53–75. Font, X., Elgammal, I., & Lamond, I. (2017). Greenhushing: the deliberate under communicating of sustainability practices by tourism businesses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,25(7), 1007–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1158829 Frangoul, A. (2022). Big business likes to trumpet ESG credentials. But a ‘greenwashing’ reckoning could be on the horizon. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/21/big-businesses-trumpet-esg-credentials-scrutiny-is-on-the-rise.html Gadinis, S., & Miazad, A. (2020). Corporate law and social risk. Vanderbilt Law Review,73(5), 1401–1474. Gadinis, S., & Miazad, A. (2021). A test of stakeholder capitalism. The Journal of Corporation Law,47(1), 47–104. Galli, D., Torelli, R., & Tibiletti, V. (2021). Signaling the adoption of the benefit corporation model: a step toward transparency. Sustainability,13, 6967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126967 Garst, J., Maas, K., & Suijs, J. (2022). Materiality assessment is an art, not a science: selecting ESG topics for sustainability reports. California Management Review OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221120692 Gatti, L., Seele, P., & Rademacher, L. (2019). Grey zone in — greenwash out. A review of greenwashing research and implications for the voluntary-mandatory tradition of CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility,4(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-019-0044-9 Ginder, W., Kwon, W. S., & Byun, S. E. (2021). Effects of internal-external congruence-based CSR positioning: an attribution theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics,169(2), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04282-w Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 2: General disclosures 2021. https://www.globalreporting.org/pdf.ashx?id=12358. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. Global Reporting Initiative. (2022a). https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. Global Reporting Initiative. (2022b). Consolidated set of the GRI standards. Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R., & Zadek, S. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,10(3), 325–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710178106 Guimaraes-Costa, N., & Cunha, M. (2008). The atrium effect of website openness on the communication of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,15, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.128 Guix, M., Font, X., & Bonilla-Priego, M. J. (2019). Materiality: stakeholder accountability choices in hotels’ sustainability reports. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,31(6), 2321–2338. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0366 Hardy, C. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International Studies of Management & Organization,31(3), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2001.11656819 Hera Group. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Herden, C., Alliu, E., Cakici, A., Cormier, T., Deguelle, C., Gambhir, S., Griffitsh, C., Gupta, S. Kamani, S. R., Kiratli, Y. S., Kispataki, M., Lange, G., de Matos, L. M., Moreno, L. T., Betancourt Nunez, H. A., Pilla, V. Raj, B., Roe, J., Skoda, M. … Edinger-Schons, L. M. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility. Sustainability Management Forum / NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum 29, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00509-x Herremans, I. M., Nazari, J. A., & Mahmoudian, F. (2016). Stakeholder relationships, engagement, and sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics,138, 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2634-0 Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly,17(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200717348 Hitachi. (2022). 2022 Sustainability report. Höllerer, M. A., van Leeuwen, T., Jancsary, D., Meyer, R., Andersen, T. H., & Vaara, E. (2019). Visual and multimodal research in organization and management studies. Routledge. Hon Hai Technology Group. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management — new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics,27, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006400707757 HP. (2021). 2021 Sustainable impact report. Huawei. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Hummel, K., & Festl-Pell, D. (2015). Much ado about nothing? Sustainability disclosure in the banking industry. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Unternehmensethik / Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics,16(3), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1688/zfwu-2015-03-hummel IBM. (2021a). 2021 GRI index. IBM. (2021b). 2021 SASB index. IBM. (2022). 2022 Environmental, social and governance report. Intel. (2022). 2021–22 Corporate responsibility report. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2013). International standard on assurance engagements (ISAE) 3000 (revised), assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information. https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-assurance-engagements-isae-3000-revised-assurance-engagements-other-audits-or-0. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. Investor Alliance for Human Rights. (2018). Investor statement on corporate accountability for digital rights 2018. https://investorsforhumanrights.org/investor-statement-corporate-accountability-digital-rights. Accessed 22 Oct 2022. Jebe, R. (2019). The convergence of financial and ESG materiality: taking sustainability mainstream. American Business Law Journal,56(3), 645–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12148 Kangun, N., Carlson, L., & Grove, S. J. (1991). Environmental advertising claims: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing,10(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000203 Katz, D. A., & McIntosh, L. A. (2021). Corporate governance update: ‘materiality’ in America and abroad. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/05/01/corporate-governance-update-materiality-in-america-and-abroad/. Accessed 19 May 2022. Kaur, A., & Lodhia, S. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and reporting: a study of Australian local councils. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,31, 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2014-1901 KDDI. (n.d.). Sustainability. https://www.kddi.com/english/corporate/sustainability/ KDDI. (2022). 2022 Integrated sustainability and financial report. Khalil, S., & O’Sullivan, P. (2017). Corporate social responsibility: internet social and environmental reporting by banks. Meditari Accountancy Research,25(3), 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2016-0082 Kim, E. H., & Lyon, T. P. (2011). Strategic environmental disclosure: evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,61(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.001 Kress, G. (1995). The social production of language: history and structures of domination. In P. Fries & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: systemic functional perspectives (pp. 115–140). Norwood. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics,43(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022962719299 Lenovo. (2022). 2021–22 ESG report. LG Electronics. (2022a). 2021–22 ESG fact book. LG Electronics. (2022b). 2021–22 Sustainability report. Liyanaarachchi, G., Deshpande, S., & Weaven, S. (2020). Market-oriented corporate digital responsibility to manage data vulnerability in online banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing,39(4), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2020-0313 Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research 122, 875–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,20(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting,24(4–5), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008 McCauley, D., & Wincuinas, J. (n.d.). Materiality of Asia: Investing away from climate risk. Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. and Fullerton fund management. https://impact.economist.com/perspectives/sites/default/files/materiality_of_asia_investing_away_from_climate_risk.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2022. Meta. (n.d.). ESG resources hub. https://investor.fb.com/esg-resources. Accessed 8 Sept 2022. Meta. (2022a). 2021 Sustainability report. Meta. (2022b). Notice of annual meeting & proxy statement. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680122000043/meta2022definitiveproxysta.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. Micek, P., & Aydin, D. D. (2017). Non-financial disclosures in the tech sector: furthering the trend. In M. Taddeo & L. Floridi (Eds.), The responsibilities of online service providers (pp. 241–261). Springer. Microsoft. (n.d.). Corporate social responsibility reports hub. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/reports-hub. Accessed 7 Apr 2022. Mumby, D. K., & Clair, R. P. (1997). Organizational discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 181–205). Sage Publications Inc. Munshi, D., & Kurian, P. (2005). Imperializing spin cycles: a postcolonial look at public relations, greenwashing, and the separation of publics. Public Relations Review,31(4), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.010 NTT. (2022). 2022 Sustainability report. O’Connor, A. (Ed.). (2022). The routledge handbook of corporate social responsibility communication. Routledge. O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly,24(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909358747 Orange. (n.d.). 2021 Integrated annual report. Ortar, L. (2020). Materiality matrixes in sustainability reporting: An empirical examination. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability,15(1), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3117749 Panasonic. (2022). 2022 Sustainability data book. Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals,4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581 Pedersen, E. R. G., Neergaard, P., Pedersen, J. T., & Gwozdz, W. (2013). Conformance and deviance: company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment,22(6), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1743 Pegatron. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Podnar, K. (2008). Guest editorial: communicating corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications,14, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701856350 Pope, S., & Wæraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: a conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics 137(1), 173–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2546-z. Pozen, D. E. (2020). Seeing transparency more clearly. Public Administration Review,80(2), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13137 Principles for Responsible Investment. (n.d.). Regulation database. https://www.unpri.org/policy/regulation-database. Accessed 20 Oct 2022. Radu, R., Ketteman, M. C., Meyer, T., & Shahin, J. (2021). Normfare: Norm entrepreneurship in internet governance. Telecommunications Policy,45, 102148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102148 Raith, D. (2023). The contest for materiality. What counts as CSR? Journal of Applied Accounting Research,24(1), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2022-0093 Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business & Society,44(4), 377–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278120 Ranking Digital Rights. (2022). Alphabet shareholders move to tackle privacy-invasive ad-targeting technologies. https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2022/01/11/alphabet-shareholders-resolutions-human-rights/. Accessed 10 Oct 2022. Reimsbach, D., Schiemann, F., Hahn, R., & Schmiedchen, E. (2020). In the eyes of the beholder: experimental evidence on the contested nature of materiality in sustainability reporting. Organization & Environment,33(4), 624–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619875436 Roisman, E. L. (2021). Can the SEC make ESG rules that are sustainable? Speech to National Investor Relations Institute. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/can-the-sec-make-esg-rules-that-are-sustainable. Accessed 13 Apr 2022. Safari, M., & Areeb, A. (2020). A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective. Accounting Forum,44, 344–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1736759 Samsung Electronics. (2021). Sustainability report 2021. Schoeneborn, D., Morsing, M., & Crane, A. (2020). Formative perspectives on the relation between CSR communication and CSR practices: pathways for walking, talking, and t(w)alking. Business & Society,59(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319845091 Schulzke, K. S., & Berger-Walliser, G. (2017). Toward a unified theory of materiality in securities law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,56, 6–70. Shackelford, S. J. (2020). The Internet of things: what everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. Siano, A., Vollero, A., Conte, F., & Amabile, S. (2017). ‘More than words’: expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research,71(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.002 SoftBank Group. (n.d.). Sustainability. https://www.softbank.jp/en/corp/sustainability/. Accessed 11 Apr 2023. SoftBank Group. (2022). 2022 ESG data book. Sony. (2022). 2022 Sustainability report. Stolowy, H., & Paugam, L. (2018). The expansion of non-financial reporting: an exploratory study. Accounting and Business Research,48(5), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470141 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (n.d.). Download SASB standards. https://www.sasb.org/standards/download/?lang=en-us. Accessed 10 Dec 2021. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (2022). SASB standards: now part of IFRS foundation. https://www.sasb.org/. Accessed 1 Dec 2022. Taiwan Semiconductor. (2021). 2021 Sustainability report. Telefónica. (n.d.a). Consolidated management report 2020. Telefónica. (n.d.b). Consolidated management report 2021. Tencent. (n.d.). Environmental, social & governance report 2021. Terrell, J. A. (2021). Materiality in review—probability, magnitude and the reasonable investor. Bracewell. https://bracewell.com/insights/materiality-review-%E2%80%94-probability-magnitude-and-reasonable-investor. Accessed 16 May 2022. Toker, K. A. (2013). Data protection. In S. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 752–59). Springer. Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: a content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,27, 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2021). SEC announces enforcement task force focused on climate and ESG issues. https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2021-42. Accessed 15 May 2022. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2023). SEC adopts rules on cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and incident disclosure by public companies. https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-139. Accessed 1 Aug 2023. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. United Kingdom Ministry for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. (2020). The government report on transparency reporting in relation to online harms. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper/outcome/government-transparency-report. Accessed 21 May 2022. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). The 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. United Nations Global Compact. (n.d.). The power of principles. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. Verizon. (n.d.). ESG resources hub. https://www.verizon.com/about/investors/esg-resources-hub. Accessed 10 June 2022. Verizon. (2021). 2021 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report. Verk, N., Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2021). A dynamic review of the emergence of corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Business Ethics,168, 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04232-6 Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 Vodafone Group plc. (n.d.). ESG hub. https://investors.vodafone.com/esg Vodafone Group plc. (2022). Annual report 2022. Vollero, A. (2022). Greenwashing: foundations and emerging research on corporate sustainability and deceptive communication. Emerald Publishing. Woolery, L., Budish, R., & Bankston, K. (2016). The transparency reporting toolkit: survey & best practice memos for reporting on U.S. government requests for user information. New America. https://www.newamerica.org/oti/policy-papers/the-transparency-reporting-toolkit/. Accessed 23 May 2022. World Benchmarking Alliance. (n.d.). Benchmarking for a better world. https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. World Benchmarking Alliance. (2022b). Digital inclusion benchmark 2021: insights report. World Benchmarking Alliance. (2022a). 2020 Digital inclusion benchmark data set. https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/explore-the-digital-inclusion-benchmark-2020-data/. Accessed 30 Sept 2021. World Economic Forum. (2022). Accelerating public-private collaboration towards a global solution for non-financial reporting. https://www.weforum.org/stakeholdercapitalism/about. Accessed 1 Oct 2022. Xiaomi Corporation. (2021). 2021 Environmental, social and governance report. Zhang, K., Pan, Z., Janardhanan, M., & Patel, I. (2022). Relationship analysis between greenwashing and environmental performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02381-9 Zharfpeykan, R. (2021). Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia’s mining/metals and financial services industries. Business Strategy and the Environment,30(4), 2209–2223. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2744