Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships

Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact of governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94:291–309

Adams RB, Mehran H (2005) Corporate performance, board structure and its determinants in the banking industry. In: EFA 2005 Moscow meetings

Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park

Albinger HS, Freeman SJ (2000) Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. J Bus Ethics 28:243–253

Allouche J, Laroche P (2006) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: a survey. In: Allouche J (ed) Corporate social responsibility: performance and stakeholders. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 3–40

Amato L, Amato CH (2007) The effects of firm size and industry in corporate living. J Bus Ethics 72:229–241

Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297

Arora P, Dharwadkar R (2011) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): the moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corp Gov Int Rev 19:136–152

Bagnoli M, Watts SG (2003) Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. J Econ Manag Strategy 12:419–445

Baird P, Gylani P (2012) Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: industry effects in a linear mixed model analysis. J Bus Ethics 109:367–388

Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120

Baron DP (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J Econ Manag Strategy 10:7–45

Baron DP (2008) Managerial contracting and corporate social responsibility. J Public Econ 92:268–288

Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

Bear S, Rhaman N, Post C (2010) Impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J Bus Ethics 97:201–221

Bebchuk LA, Weisbach MS (2010) The state of corporate governance research. Rev Financ Stud 23:939–961

Bebchuk LA, Grinstein Y, Peyer U (2010) Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. J Financ 65:2363–2401

Becchetti L, Ciciretti R, Hasan I, Kobeissi N (2012) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. J Bus Res 65:1628–1635

Bénabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305):1–19

Béthoux E, Didry C, Mias A (2007) What codes of conduct tell us: corporate social responsibility and the nature of the multinational corporation. Corp Gov Int Rev 15:77–90

Bhagat S, Black B (2002) The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance. J Corp Law 27:231–274

Boeker W, Goodstein J (1993) Performance and successor choice: the moderating effects of governance and ownership. Acad Manag J 36:173–186

Bollen KA, Stine R (1990) Direct and indirect effects: classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Soc Methodol 20:115–140

Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32:946–967

Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A (2010) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J Bus Ethics 83:435–451

Carroll AB (1979) A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 4:497–505

Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts. Int J Manag Rev 12:85–105

Cespa G, Cestone G (2007) Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. J Econ Manag Strategy 16:741–771

Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2009) CEO compensation and board structure. J Financ 64:231–261

Coffey BS, Wang J (1998) Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. J Bus Ethics 17:1595–1603

Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, Mahwah

Cuadrado-Ballesteros B, García-Rubio R, Martínez-Ferrero J (2014) Effect of the composition of the board of director son corporate social responsibility. Span Account Rev (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.02.003

Dahya J, Dimitrov O, McConnell J (2008) Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: a cross-country analysis. J Financ Econ 87:73–100

Dalton D, Daily C, Johnson J, Ellstrand A (1999) Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J 42:674–686

Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manag Rev 22:20–47

De Miguel A, Pindado J, De la Torre C (2004) Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain. Strateg Manag J 25:1199–1207

De Villiers C, Naiker V, Van Staden CJ (2011) The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. J Manag 37:1636–1663

Diller J (1999) A social conscience in the global marketplace? Labour dimensions of codes of conduct, social labelling and investor initiatives. Int Labour Rev 138:99–129

Donker H, Poff D, Zahir S (2008) Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: a look at the Canadian context. J Bus Ethics 82:527–537

Fassin Y, Van Rossem A (2009) Corporate governance in the debate on CSR and ethics: sense making of social issues in management by authorities and CEOs. Corp Gov Int Rev 17:573–593

Fernández Sánchez JL, Luna L, Baraibar E (2011) The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18:91–101

Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MA, Muñoz-Torres MJ (2012) The impact of the board of directors characteristics on corporate performance and risk-taking before and during the global financial crisis. RMS 6:207–226

Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MA, Muñoz-Torres MJ (2013) Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: an empirical study of board diversity. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag (in press). doi: 10.1002/csr.1333

Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

García-Castro R, Ariño MA, Canela MA (2010) Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. J Bus Ethics 92:107–126

Gillan SL (2006) Recent developments in corporate governance: an overview. J Corp Financ 12:381–402

Harjoto M, Jo H (2011) Corporate governance and CSR nexus. J Bus Ethics 100:45–67

Haslam S, Ryan MK, Kulich C, Trojanowski G, Atkins C (2010) Investing with prejudice: the relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. Br J Manag 21:484–497

Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 76:408–420

Hillman A, Keim G (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22:125–139

Himmelberg C, Hubbard R, Palia D (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. J Financ Econ 53:353–384

Holmbeck GN (1997) Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the Chile-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:599–610

Holmbeck GN (2002) Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol 27:87–96

Hung H (2011) Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility. A stakeholder perspective. J Bus Ethics 103:385–402

Ibrahim NA, Angelidis JP (1995) The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: are there differences between inside and outside directors? J Bus Ethics 14:405–410

Jackling B, Johl S (2009) Board structure and firm performance: evidence form India’s top companies. Corp Gov Int Rev 17:492–509

Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M (2008) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corp Gov Int Rev 16:443–459

Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360

Jo H, Harjoto MA (2011) Corporate governance and firm value: the impact of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 103:351–383

Jo H, Harjoto MA (2012) The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 106:53–72

Johnson RA, Greening DW (1999) The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad Manag J 42:564–576

Kassinis G, Vafeas M (2002) Boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strateg Manag J 23:399–415

Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1998) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston

Kurucz EC, Colbert BA, Wheeler DC (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Seigel D (eds) The oxford handbook on corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–112

Lafuente E, Bayo-Moriones A, García-Cestona MA (2010) ISO-9000 certification and ownership structure: effects upon firm performance. Br J Manag 21:649–665

Lenox M, Nash J (2003) Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: a comparison across four trade association programs. Bus Strategy Environ 12:343–356

Lo S, Sheu HJ (2007) Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corp Gov Int Rev 15:345–358

Mackey A, Mackey TB, Barney JB (2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad Manag Rev 32:817–835

MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychol Methods 7:83–104

Mak Y, Kusnadi Y (2005) Size really matters: further evidence on negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pac-Basic Financ J 13:301–318

Marquardt DW (1980) You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 75:87–91

Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism. J Law Econ 43:583–618

McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg Manag J 21:603–609

McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Profit maximizing corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 26:504–505

Mínguez-Vera A, Martín-Ugedo JF (2007) Does ownership structure affect value? A panel data analysis for the Spanish market. Int Rev Financ Anal 16:81–98

Mishra S, Suar D (2010) Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? J Bus Ethics 95:571–601

Moore G (2001) Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation in the UK supermarket industry. J Bus Ethics 34:299–315

Muth M, Donalson L (1998) Stewardship theory and board structure: a contingency approach. Corp Gov Int Rev 6:5–28

Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24:403–441

Parrino R, Weisbach MS (1999) Measuring investment distortions arising from stockholder-bondholder conflicts. J Financ Econ 53:3–42

Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev 80(12):56–68

Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

Prado-Lorenzo JM, García-Sánchez I, Gallego-Álvarez I (2009) Características del consejo de administración e información en materia de responsabilidad social corporativa. Rev Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 38(141):107–135

Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40:879–891

Preston LE, O’Bannon D (1997) The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Bus Soc 36:5–31

Prior D, Surroca J, Tribó JA (2008) Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corp Gov Int Rev 16:160–177

Rausch A (2011) Reconstruction of decision-making behavior in shareholder and stakeholder theory: implications for management accounting systems. Rev Manag Sci 5:137–169

Reverte C (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J Bus Ethics 88:351–366

Ruhnka J, Boerstler H (1998) Governmental incentives for corporate self-regulation. J Bus Ethics 17:309–326

Sahin K, Basfirinci CS, Ozsalih A (2011) The impact of board composition on corporate financial and social responsibility performance: evidence form public-listed companies in Turkey. Afr J Bus Manag 5:2959–2978

Salama A, Anderson K, Toms JS (2011) Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 20:192–204

Scherer A, Palazzo G, Baumann D (2006) Global rules and private actors, toward a new role of the TNC in global governance. Bus Ethics Q 16:502–532

Sethi SP (2002) Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations. Bus Soc Rev 107:20–40

Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52:737–783

Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7:422–445

Simpson WG, Kohers T (2002) The link between corporate social and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. J Bus Ethics 35:97–109

Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models’. In: Leinhardt S (ed) Sociological methodology 1982. American Sociological Association, Washington, pp 290–312

Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) The role of intangible resources in explaining the relationship between corporate responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 31:463–490

Van Den Berghe LA, Levrau A (2004) Evaluating boards of directors: what constitutes a good corporate board? Corp Gov Int Rev 12:461–478

Waddock S, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18:303–319

Walls J, Berrone P, Phan P (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? Strateg Manag J 33:885–913

Wang J, Coffey BS (1992) Board composition and corporate philanthropy. J Bus Ethics 11:771–778

Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New York

Wintoki MB, Lickn J, Netter J (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J Financ Econ 105:581–606

Wood DJ (2010) Measuring corporate social performance: a review. Int J Manag Rev 12:50–84

Wotruba T (1997) Industry self-regulation: a review and extension to a global setting. J Public Policy Mark 16:38–54

Zeng SX, Xu XD, Yin HT, Tam CM (2012) Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. J Bus Ethics 109:309–321

Zhao X, Lynch JG, Quimei C (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res 37:197–206