Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR

Mallika Tamvada1,2
1School of Law, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
2 Department of Humanities and Law, University of Bournemouth, Poole, UK

Tóm tắt

The absence of consensus on what should constitute Corporate Social Responsibility has inhibited consistent CSR legislation around the world. This paper poses a fundamental question on what should constitute CSR and what should be the nature of CSR regulation? By constructing the boundaries of CSR, the paper offers scope for consistently developing CSR regulation around the world. It construes CSR as consisting of business relation and impact relation, and demonstrates that these are intertwined with legal responsibilities of business and, consequentially, with accountability. It accomplishes this by establishing the obligatory nature of responsibilities using the lens of ethical and legal jurisprudence. This new approach towards CSR recasts it as an obligatory responsibility that is linked to accountability. Furthermore, the framework provides a foundation for consistent development of CSR regulation across different countries that can lead to effective discharge of corporates’ social responsibilities.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aaronson, S. (2005). “Minding our business”: what the United States government has done and can do to ensure that U.S. multinationals act responsibly in foreign markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 175–198. Abah, A. L. (2016). Legal regulation of CSR: the case of social media and gender-based harassment. University of Baltimore Journal of Media Law & Ethics, 5, 38. Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environment reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757. Adams, C., Frost, G., & Webber, W. (2004). Triple bottom line: A review of the literature. In Adrian Henriques and Julie Richardson (Eds.), The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up (pp. 17–25). Routledge. Agudelo, M. A. L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1. Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: doing good and doing well. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855–879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. Alamgir, F., & Banerjee, S. B. (2019). Contested compliance regimes in global production networks: Insights from the Bangladesh garment industry. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 72(2), 272–297. Alves, I. M. (2009). Green spin everywhere: how green washing reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm. Journal of Global Change & Governance, 2(1), 1–26. Amao, O. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, human rights and the law: multinational corporations in developing countries. Abingdon: Routledge. Amodu, N. (2017). Regulation and enforcement of corporate social responsibility in corporate Nigeria. Journal of African Law, 61(1), 105–130. Aurora, V., & Helen, Y. (2011). The business of human rights: an evolving agenda for corporate responsibility. London: Zed Books Ltd. Baden, D. (2016). A reconstruction of Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility for the 21st century. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 8. Barnett, M. L. (2016). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society, 58(1), 167–190. Barrett, W. (2004). Responsibility, Accountability and Corporate Activity, Opinion: Australia’s E-journal of Social and Political Debate. Available at https://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=2480. Barry, V., & Shaw, W. H. (1979). Moral issues in business. Belmont: Wadsworth. Beckers, A. (2019). Towards a regulatory private law approach for CSR self-regulation? The effect of private law on corporate CSR strategies. European Review of Private Law, 27(2), 221–243. Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2012). From norms to programs: The United Nations global compact and global governance. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 149–166. BHRC (2017). “Corporate impunity is common & remedy for victims is rare”. Business and human rights resource center. Available at: https://www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/documents/CLA_AB_Final_Apr%202017.pdf. Accessed on 4 Aug 2019. Bivins, T. (2006). Responsibility and accountability. In K. Fitzpatrick & C. Bronstein (Eds.), Ethics in Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy, 19–38. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 294–311. Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper. Buhmann, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: What role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(2), 188–202. Buhmann, K. (2011). Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of corporate social responsibility: The EU case. International Journal of Law in Context, 7(2), 139–179. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. Carroll, A.B., & Shabana, K.M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A review of concepts, research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 3. Chauvey, J. N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 789–803. Chhaparia, P., & Jha, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in India: the legal evolution of CSR policy. Amity Global Business Review, 13(1), 79–84. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322. Demirbag, M., Wood, G., Makhmadshoev, D., & Rymkevich, O. (2017). Varieties of CSR: institutions and socially responsible behaviour. International Business Review, 26(6), 1064–1074. Dentchev, N. A., Haezendonck, E., & van Balen, M. (2017). The role of governments in the business and society debate. Business & Society, 56(4), 527–544. Dentchev, N. A., van Balen, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2015). On voluntarism and the role of governments in CSR: towards a contingency approach. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(4), 378–397. Devlin, P. (1965). The enforcement of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dhiman, A., Sen, A., & Bhardwaj, P. (2018). Effect of self-accountability on self-regulatory behaviour: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 79–97. Dillard, J. (2013). Human rights within an ethic of accountability. In: Corporate social responsibility (Vol. 196(220)196-220). Routledge in association with GSE Research. Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Drucker, P. F. (1984). Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26(000002), 53. Dworkin, G. (1998). Devlin was right: Law and the enforcement of morality. William and Mary Law Review, 40, 927. Dworkin, R. (1966). Lord Devlin and the enforcement of morals. The Yale Law Journal, 75(6), 986–1005. Eabrasu, M. (2012). A moral pluralist perspective on corporate social responsibility: From good to controversial practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 429–439. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken: Wiley. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2014). The integrated reporting movement: meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. Hoboken: Wiley. Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., & Ribot, S. (2015). Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(2), 8–17. Eccles, Robert G. and Krzus, Michael P. and Solano, Carlos (2019). A comparative analysis of integrated reporting in ten countries. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3345590 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3345590. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing. Elkington, J. (1998a). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22. Elkington, J. (1998b). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review, 25. Available at https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it. Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 419–443. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman: Boston. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York: New York Times Magazine. Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Towards a Theory of Accountability in organisations and human resource management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 16, pp. 1–51). Stamford: JAI Press. Gatti, L., Vishwanath, B., Seele, P., & Cottier, B. (2019). Are we moving beyond voluntary CSR? Exploring theoretical and managerial implications of mandatory CSR resulting from the New Indian Companies Act. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 961–972. Goldberg, J. C., & Zipursky, B. C. (2006). Tort law and moral luck. Cornell Law Review, 92, 1123. Green, L. (2008). Positivism and the inseparability of law and morals. New York University Law Review, 83, 1035. Idemudia, U., & Kwakyewah, C. (2018). Analysis of the Canadian national corporate social responsibility strategy: Insights and implications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 928–938. IIRC (2013). Integrated reporting, international integrated reporting council. Available at: https://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/. Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P., & Khara, N. (2017). CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent threat of selective decoupling. Business & Society, 56(3), 454–486. Jansen, N. (2013). The idea of legal responsibility. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 221–252. Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525–540. Kara, P. (2018). The role of corporate social responsibility in corporate accountability of multinationals: is it ever enough without ‘hard law’? European Company Law, 15(4), 118–125. Keith, N. (2010). Evolution of corporate accountability: From moral panic to corporate social responsibility. Business Law International, 11, 247. Knudsen, J. S. (2018). Government regulation of international corporate social responsibility in the US and the UK: how domestic institutions shape mandatory and supportive initiatives. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(1), 164–188. Lamarche, T., & Bodet, C. (2018). Does CSR contribute to sustainable development? What a regulation approach can tell us. Review of Radical Political Economics, 50(1), 154–172. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189. Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73. Leonidou, C. N., & Skarmeas, D. (2017). Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 401–415. Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social-responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41. Luo, J., Kaul, A., & Seo, H. (2018). Winning us with trifles: adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management Journal, 39(10), 2591–2617. Macdonald, K. (2014). The meaning and purposes of transnational accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(4), 426–436. Malesky, E., & Taussig, M. (2017). The danger of not listening to firms: government responsiveness and the goal of regulatory compliance. The Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1741–1770. Malesky, E., & Taussig, M. (2019). Participation, government legitimacy, and regulatory compliance in emerging economies: a firm-level field experiment in Vietnam. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 530–551. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. McInerney, T. (2007). Putting regulation before responsibility: towards binding norms of corporate social responsibility. Cornell International Law Journal, 40, 171. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. Meynhardt, T., & Gomez, P. (2019). Building blocks for alternative four-dimensional pyramids of corporate social responsibilities. Business & Society, 58(2), 404–438. Nieto, P. (2005). Why regulating: corporate social responsibility is a conceptual error and implies a dead weight for competitiveness. Tanpa Tahun: The European Enterprise Journal. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262. Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627. Okoye, A. (2016). Legal approaches and corporate social responsibility: towards a Llewellyn’s law-jobs approach. Abingdon: Routledge. Osuji, O. (2011). Fluidity of regulation-CSR nexus: the multinational corporate corruption example. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 31–57. Osuji, O. K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, juridification and globalisation:‘inventive interventionism’for a ‘paradox’. International Journal of Law in Context, 11(3), 265–298. Panda, S., D'Souza, D. E., & Blankson, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in emerging economies: investigating firm behavior in the Indian context. Thunderbird International Business Review, 61(2), 267–276. Parsa, S., Roper, I., Muller-Camen, M., & Szigetvari, E. (2018). Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. In: Accounting forum (Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 47-64). Taylor & Francis. Rahim, M. M. (2013). Legal regulation of corporate social responsibility. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40400-9. Rivera, H. F. (2013). Business and human rights: towards an effective legal regulation, or the maintenance of the status quo? Mexican Yearbook of International Law, 13, 313–354. Ross, D. (2017). A research-informed model for corporate social responsibility: towards accountability to impacted stakeholders. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2(1), 8. Rühmkorf, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, private law and global supply chains. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Sachs, S., Rühli, E., & Kern, I. (2009). Sustainable success with stakeholders: the untapped potential. Berlin: Springer. Schembera, S. (2018). Implementing corporate social responsibility: empirical insights on the impact of the UN global compact on its business participants. Business & Society, 57(5), 783–825. Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Wettstein, F. (2017). Beyond guilty verdicts: human rights litigation and its impact on corporations’ human rights policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 545–562. Shiu, Y. M., & Yang, S. L. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455–470. Singh, S., Holvoet, N., & Pandey, V. (2018). Bridging sustainability and corporate social responsibility: culture of monitoring and evaluation of CSR initiatives in India. Sustainability, 10(7), 2353. Situ, H., Tilt, C. A., & Seet, P. S. (2018). The influence of the government on corporate environmental reporting in China: an authoritarian capitalism perspective. Business & Society, 0007650318789694. Sobczak, A. (2006). Are codes of conduct in global supply chains really voluntary? From soft law regulation of labour relations to consumer law. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 167–184. Subramaniam, N., Kansal, M., & Babu, S. (2017). Governance of mandated corporate social responsibility: evidence from Indian government-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(3), 543–563. Susson, M. A. (2012). Environments, externalities and ethics: compulsory multinational and transnational corporate bonding to promote accountability for externalization of environmental harm. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal, 20, 65. Szabó, D. G., & Sørensen, K. E. (2015). New EU directive on the disclosure of non-financial information (CSR). Nordic & European Company Law Working Paper, (15-01). Thirarungrueang, K. (2013). Rethinking CSR in Australia: time for binding regulation? International Journal of Law and Management, 55(3), 173–200. Van Calster, G. (2016). European private international law. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. (2015). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 469–486. Visser, W. (2006). Revisiting Carroll’s CSR pyramid. Corporate citizenship in developing countries, 29–5e6. Vos, J. (2009). Actions speak louder than words: greenwashing in corporate America. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics & Public Policy, 23, 673. Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business & Society Review, 109(1), 5–42. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84. Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: how organizations translate climate change into business as usual. The Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1633–1661. Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: a social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(1), 102–130. Zerk, J. A. (2006). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility: limitations and opportunities in international law (Vol. 48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zuo, W., Schwartz, M. S., & Wu, Y. (2017). Institutional forces affecting corporate social responsibility behavior of the Chinese food industry. Business & Society, 56(5), 705–737.