Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations

Aguilera, 2008, Costs, contingencies and complementarities in corporate governance models, Organization Science, 19, 475, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0322

Aguilera, 2003, The cross national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants, Academy of Management Review, 28, 447, 10.5465/amr.2003.10196772

Aoki, 2001

Arnold, 2004, Enron: an examination of agency problems, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 751, 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.005

ASX. Principles of good corporate governance and best practice recommendations, Australian Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Council; 2007.

Band, 1992, Corporate governance: why agency theory is not enough, European Management Journal, 10, 453, 10.1016/0263-2373(92)90011-R

Barney, 1994, Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175, 10.1002/smj.4250150912

Becht, 2002

Berle, 1932

Berry, 1998, Proactive corporate environment management: a new industrial revolution, Academy of Management Executive, 12, 38, 10.5465/AME.1998.650515

Bhagat, 2002, The non correlation between board independence and long term firm performance, Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231

Boatright, 1994, Fiduciary duties and the shareholder–management relation: or what's so special about shareholders?, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 393, 10.2307/3857339

Boyd, 1990, Corporate linkages and organizational environment: a test of the resource dependence model, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419, 10.1002/smj.4250110602

Brennan, 2008, Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 885, 10.1108/09513570810907401

Chin, 2004, Levels of ownership structure, board composition, and board size seem unimportant in New Zealand, Corporate Ownership and Control, 2, 119, 10.22495/cocv2i1p9

Clarke, 2005, Accounting for Enron: shareholder value and stakeholder interests, Corporate Governance, 13, 598, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00454.x

Clark, 2006, The sum of all fears: do directors have valid concerns on the unintended impact of new regulations?, Corporate Governance, 6, 6, 10.1108/14720700610649418

Clarkson, 1995, A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review, 20, 92, 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

Claessens, 2002, Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholders, The Journal of Finance, 57, 2741, 10.1111/1540-6261.00511

Cobb G, Collison D, Power D, Stevenson L. FTSE4Good: perceptions and performance, ACCA Research Report No 88, Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London; 2005.

Collier, 2008, Stakeholder accountability: a field study of the implementation of a governance improvement plan, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 933, 10.1108/09513570810907429

Corporate Law Economic Reform Program Act (2004). Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (CLERP) (Audit Reform and Corporate Disclosure) Act 2004, available at: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/Act1.nsf/asmade/bytitle/66B0C93ECDA86C21CA256F720011722E?OpenDocument.(accessed 27th Oct 2009).

Coyle, 2007

CPA Australia, 2008

Cutting, 2001, Formulating the metaphysics of governance: explaining the dynamics of governance using a new JEWAL synthesis framework, Journal of Management Development, 20, 526, 10.1108/02621710110399800

Daily, 1994, Bankruptcy and corporate governance: the impact of board composition and structure, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603, 10.2307/256801

Daily, 2003, Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data, Academy of Management Review, 28, 371, 10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

Dalton, 1998, Meta-analytical review of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K

Dalton, 1999, Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674, 10.2307/256988

Dalton, 2003, Meta-analysis of financial performance and equity: fusion or confusion?, Academy of Management Journal, 46, 13, 10.2307/30040673

Davis, 2005, New directions in corporate governance, Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 143, 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122249

Davis, 1997, Toward a stewardship theory of management, Academy of Management Review, 22, 20, 10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258

Davis, 1994, A social movement perspective on corporate governance control, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 10.2307/2393497

Donaldson, 1991, Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns, Australian Journal of Management Review, 20, 65

Donaldson, 1995, The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications, Academy of Management Review, 20, 65, 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992

Durden, 2006, The increasing cost of corporate governance: decision speed-bumps for managers, Corporate Governance, 6, 84, 10.1108/14720700610649490

Eisenberg, 1998, Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms, Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35, 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00003-8

Eisenhardt, 1985, Control: organizational and economic approaches, Management Science, 31, 134, 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134

Eisenhardt, 1989, Agency theory: an assessment and review, Academy of Management Review, 14, 57, 10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Fama, 1980, Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288, 10.1086/260866

Fama, 1983, Agency problems and residual claims, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301, 10.1086/467037

Filatotchev, 2008, Developing an organizational theory of corporate governance: comments on Henry L. Tosi, JR. (2008) “Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research”, Journal of Management Governance, 12, 171, 10.1007/s10997-008-9055-8

Filatotchev, 2006, The firms strategic dynamics and corporate governance life cycle, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2, 256, 10.1108/17439130610705481

Freeman, 1994

Gales, 1994, An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations, Journal of Business Research, 30, 271, 10.1016/0148-2963(94)90057-4

Godfrey, 2003

Hart, 2004, Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination, Academy of Management Executive, 18, 7, 10.5465/AME.2004.12691227

Hermalin, 2003, Board of Directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature, Economic Policy Review (Federal Reserve Bank of New York), 9, 7

Hill, 1992, Stakeholder–agency theory, Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x

Hillman, 2003, Board of Directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependency perspectives, Academy of Management Review, 28, 383, 10.5465/amr.2003.10196729

Hillman, 2000, The resource dependency role of corporate directors: strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change, Journal of Management Studies, 37, 235, 10.1111/1467-6486.00179

Hirsch, 1987, “Dirty hands” versus “Clean models”. Is sociology in danger of being seduced by economics?, Theory and Society, 317, 10.1007/BF00139485

Huse, 2000, Boards of directors in SMEs: a review and research agenda, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 271, 10.1080/08985620050177912

Jensen, 1976, Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jensen, 2001, Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 8, 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00434.x

Johnson, 1996, Boards of Directors: a review and research agenda, Journal of Management, 22, 409, 10.1177/014920639602200303

Lane, 1999, Agency problems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 555, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199806)19:6<555::AID-SMJ955>3.0.CO;2-Y

Lee, 2003, Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese Firms: agency and stewardship perspectives, Academy of Management Journal, 46, 212, 10.2307/30040615

Luoma, 1999, Stakeholders and corporate boards: institutional influences on board composition, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 553, 10.2307/256976

Lynall, 2003, Board composition from adolescence to maturity: a multitheoretic view, Academy of Management Review, 28, 416, 10.5465/amr.2003.10196743

Marens, 1999, Getting real: stakeholder theory, managerial practice and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders, Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 273, 10.2307/3857475

Mizruchi, 1983, Who controls whom? An examination between management and boards of directors in large American corporations, Academy of Management Review, 8, 426, 10.5465/amr.1983.4284426

Mizruchi, 1988, A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates, Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 194, 10.2307/2393055

Monks, 2004

Muth, 1998, Stewardship theory and board structure: a contingency approach, Corporate Governance; An International Review, 6, 5, 10.1111/1467-8683.00076

O’Connell, 2007, Reflections on stewardship reporting, Accounting Horizons, 21, 215, 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.215

OECD, 1999

OECD, 2004

Parker, 2007, Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge, Accounting and Business Research, 37, 39, 10.1080/00014788.2007.9730057

Parkinson, 1993

Perrow, 1986

Pfeffer, 1972, Size and composition of corporate board of directors: the organization and its environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349, 10.2307/2391668

Pfeffer, 1978

Phan, 2001, Corporate governance in the newly emerging economies, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17, 131, 10.1023/A:1010630320396

Roberts, 2001, Trust and control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: the individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability, Human Relations, 54, 1547, 10.1177/00187267015412001

Roberts, 2006, In the mirror of the market: the disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings, Accountability, Organizations and Society, 31, 277, 10.1016/j.aos.2005.02.001

Roberts, 2009, No one is perfect: the limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 957, 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005

Sikka, 2008, Corporate Governance: what about the workers, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, 21, 10.1108/09513570810907438

Singh, 1986, Organizational change and organizational mortality, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 367

Solomon, 2007

Sundaram, 2004, The corporate objective revisited, Organization Science, 15, 350, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0068

Sundaramurthy, 2003, Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance, Academic Management Review, 28, 397, 10.5465/amr.2003.10196737

Thompson, 1967

Tian, 2001, Board composition, leadership structure and performance in Chinese shareholding companies, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 245, 10.1023/A:1010628209918

Toms, 2004, Corporate Governance, business strategy, and the dynamics of networks: a theoretical model and application to the British cotton industry, 1830–1980, Organizational Studies, 25, 629, 10.1177/0170840604040678

Unerman, 2007

Waddock, 2002, The new business imperative, Academy of Management Executive, 16, 132, 10.5465/AME.2002.7173581

Williamson, 1984, Corporate governance, Yale Law Journal, 93, 1197, 10.2307/796256

Wolk, 1997

Wright, 1999, Inside the firm: socioeconomic versus agency perspectives on firm competitiveness, Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 295, 10.1016/S1053-5357(99)00019-0

Young, 2001, The resource dependence, service and control functions of boards of directors in Hong Kong and Taiwanese firms, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 223, 10.1023/A:1010624109010

Young, 2008, A holistic model of corporate governance: a new research framework, Corporate Governance, 8, 94, 10.1108/14720700810853437

Zahra, 1989, Board of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model, Journal of Management, 15, 291, 10.1177/014920638901500208