Corporate (and stakeholder) responsibility in Central and Eastern Europe

Emerald - Tập 1 Số 3 - Trang 203-211 - 2006
Heather Elms1
1McDonough School of Business Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), offering a characterization, explanation, and critique. A recent European Commission conference on “CSR in an Enlarged Europe” suggests European interest in such an understanding, and other developments in the paper suggest a broader interest.Design/methodology/approachThe paper utilizes local observations and analyses of secondary materials available from multinational and local companies in the region. Throughout, it offers examples of and perspectives on corporate and stakeholder responsibility in CEE. The paper suggests that CSR should be understood as corporate responsibility to stakeholders, rather than as corporate philanthropy, public relations, or marketing, and that limitations associated with corporate responsibility in CEE are associated with limitations in stakeholder responsibility. It proposes that in a market in which stakeholders place value on ethical behavior, corporate responsibility becomes endogenous. It identifies reasons for the lack of such stakeholder activism in CEE.FindingsThe paper's main conclusion is that without stakeholder responsibility, corporate responsibility will not develop in CEE. However, it also suggests and describes multiple examples of developments in the region that will contribute to both.Originality/valueCEE provides an excellent arena in which to examine the development of both corporate and stakeholder responsibility. That examination provides insights on CSR elsewhere in the world. Additionally, CEE has been identified as a potential laboratory for excellence in CSR, but the paper identifies issues that must be addressed for responsibility to become a reality in the region.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bonardi, J. and Keim, G. (2005), “Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, p. 355.

Elms, H. and Berman, S. (2006), “Stakeholders and common agents: implications of an integration of two strategic theories for corporate governance and firm performance”, Working paper.

European Academy of Business in Society (2005), “Enhancing knowledge and research on CSR in Europe: Central and Eastern European perspectives: summary workshop report”, paper presented at EABIS Annual Meeting, Warsaw, Poland.

European Commission (2001), Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility: Green Paper, European Commission, Brussels.

European Commission (2005), “Launch of European alliance for corporate social responsibility”, European Commission, Brussels, March 22, press release, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/index_en.htm.

Featherstone, L. (2005), “Down and out in discount America”, The Nation, January 3.

Freeman, R.E. (2004), “Has the idea of corporate social responsibility outlived its usefulness?”, paper presented at Posting for 2004 European Academy for Business & Society Annual Meeting, Ghent, available at: www.vlerick.be/eabis/debate.htm.

Hoge, W. (2006), “UN delays action on rights council opposed by US”, New York Times, March 11.

International Finance Corporation (2003), Towards Sustainable and Responsible Investment in Emerging Markets, International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC.

McNamara, R. (2003), The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert McNamara, Documentary film directed by Errol Morris.

Mackey, J. (2005), “The social responsibility of business”, Debate in Reason, October.

Margolis, J. and Walsh, J.P. (2003), “Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp. 268‐305.

Orange, R. (2005), “Oil giants hold their breath over next ‘colour’ revolutions”, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, November 6.

Paine, L. and Moldoveanu (1999), Royal Dutch/Shell in Nigeria, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA, (Case No. 399126).

Politi, J. (2006), “$67bn upheaval in telecoms”, Financial Times, March 6, p. 1.

Richter, J. (2003), Building on Quicksand: The Global Compact, Democratic Governance, and Nestle, Centre Europe Tier‐Monde (CETIM), International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN), Geneva Infant Feeding Association (GIFA), and the Berne Declaration, Geneva.

Skapinker, M. (2004), “Strategies to avoid being ambushed by public opinion”, Financial Times, March 5.

Spar, D. and Burns, J. (2000), Hitting the Wall: Nike & International Labor Practices, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA, (Case No. 700047).

United Nations (2006), “UN global compact participant search”, March 16, available at: www.unglobalcompact.org.

United Nations Development Program (2005), Employing the Roma: Insights from Business, UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and the CIS, Bratislava.

Wicks, A. (2004), “Turning the tables: a conversation about stakeholder responsibility and business excellence”, paper presented at the 2004 Ruffin Lectures, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia.

East West Management Institute (2006), “Survey of reporting on corporate social responsibility”, Partners for Financial Stability Program, East West Management Institute, Budapest, available at: www.pfsprogram.org/capitalmarkets.php.

European Commission (2002), Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development, European Commission, Brussels.

Hoover's On‐Line (2006), “Monsanto Company: history”.

Williamson, H., Minder, R. and Proissl, W. (2006), “Brussels to side with business on CSR”, Financial Times, March 13.

World Bank (2005), What Does Business Think about Corporate Responsibility? Part II: A Comparison of Attitudes and Practices in Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 1 Số 3

203-211

Thông tin tác giả