Coronary Angiographic Characteristics That Influence Fractional Flow Reserve
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
1. Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. <i>Circulation</i> 2005; 111: 3481–3488.
2. Task Force Members,Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. <i>Eur Heart J</i> 2013; 34: 2949–3003.
3. Keeley EC, Hillis LD. Primary PCI for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. <i>N Engl J Med</i> 2007; 356: 47–54.
4. Ribichini F, Ferrero V, Wijns W. Reperfusion treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. <i>Prog Cardiovasc Dis</i> 2004; 47: 131–157.
5. Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT. Does percutaneous coronary intervention reduce mortality in patients with stable chronic angina: Are we talking about apples and oranges? <i>Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes</i> 2009; 2: 123–126.
6. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. <i>N Engl J Med</i> 2007; 356: 1503–1516.
7. Schomig A, Mehilli J, de Waha A, Seyfarth M, Pache J, Kastrati A. A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials of a percutaneous coronary intervention-based strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol</i> 2008; 52: 894–904.
8. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. <i>Circulation</i> 2005; 111: 2906–2912.
9. Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, Pepine CJ, Knatterud GL, Geller N, et al. Asymptomatic cardiac ischemia pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: Outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. <i>Circulation</i> 1997; 95: 2037–2043.
10. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol</i> 2007; 49: 2105–2111.
11. Pijls NH. Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. <i>Circ J</i> 2013; 77: 561–569.
12. De Bruyne B, Sarma J. Fractional flow reserve: A review: Invasive imaging. <i>Heart</i> 2008; 94: 949–959.
13. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. <i>N Engl J Med</i> 2009; 360: 213–224.
14. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. <i>N Engl J Med</i> 2012; 367: 991–1001.
15. Nam CW, Mangiacapra F, Entjes R, Chung IS, Sels JW, Tonino PA, et al. Functional syntax score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol</i> 2011; 58: 1211–1218.
16. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: Executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on coronary angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. <i>Circulation</i> 1999; 99: 2345–2357.
17. Medina A, Suárez de Lezo J, Pan M. A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. <i>Rev Esp Cardiol</i> 2006; 59: 183 (in Spanish).
18. Pijls NH, Sels JW. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol</i> 2012; 59: 1045–1057.
19. Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Siebert U, Pijls NH, FAME Study Investigators. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. <i>Am Heart J</i> 2007; 154: 632–636.
20. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. <i>Circulation</i> 1993; 87: 1354–1367.
21. Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Deksissa T, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, et al. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. <i>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</i> 2012; 13: 177–182.
22. Hoole SP, Seddon MD, Poulter RS, Starovoytov A, Wood DA, Saw J. Development and validation of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) angiographic scoring tool (FAST) to improve the angiographic grading and selection of intermediate lesions that require FFR assessment. <i>Coron Artery Dis</i> 2012; 23: 45–50.
23. Yamashita J, Tanaka N, Fujita H, Akasaka T, Takayama T, Oikawa Y, et al. Usefulness of functional assessment in the treatment of patients with moderate angiographic paclitaxel-eluting stent restenosis. <i>Circ J</i> 2013; 77: 1180–1185.
24. Nakamura M, Yamagishi M, Ueno T, Hara K, Ishiwata S, Itoh T, et al. Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry. <i>Cardiovasc Interv Ther</i> 2014; 29: 300–308.
26. Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, Lycett R, Lawford PV, Hose DR, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: Modeling the significance of coronary lesions: Results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. <i>JACC Cardiovasc Interv</i> 2013; 6: 149–157.
27. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol</i> 2011; 58: 1989–1997.