Coordination of verification activities with incentives: a two-firm model
Tóm tắt
In systems engineering, verification activities evaluate the extent to which a system under development satisfies its requirements. In large systems engineering projects, multiple firms are involved in the system development, and hence verification activities must be coordinated. Self-interest impedes the implementation of verification strategies that are beneficial for all firms while encouraging each firm to choose a verification strategy beneficial to itself. Incentives for verification activities can motivate a single firm to adopt verification strategies beneficial to all firms in the project, but these incentives must be offered judiciously to minimize unnecessary expenditures and prevent the abuse of goodwill. In this paper, we use game theory to model a contractor-subcontractor scenario, in which the subcontractor provides a component to the contractor, who further integrates it into their system. Our model uses belief distributions to capture each firm’s epistemic uncertainty in their component’s state prior to verification, and we use multiscale decision theory to model interdependencies between the contractor and subcontractor’s design. We propose an incentive mechanism that aligns the verification strategies of the two firms and using our game-theoretic model, we identify those scenarios where the contractor benefits from incentivizing the subcontractor’s verification activities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahmadi R, Wang RH (1999) Managing development risk in product design processes. Oper Res 47(2):235–246
Baiman S, Fischer PE, Rajan MV (2000) Information, contracting, and quality costs. Manage Sci 46(6):776–789
Balachandran KR, Radhakrishnan S (2005) Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain. Manage Sci 51(8):1266–1277
Barad M, Engel A (2006) Optimizing VVT strategies: a decomposition approach. J Oper Res Soc 57(8):965–974
Boumen R, de Jong IS, Vermunt J, van de Mortel-Fronczak J, Rooda J (2008a) Risk-based stopping criteria for test sequencing. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part A Syst Humans 38(6):1363–1373
Boumen R, de Jong IS, Vermunt J, van de Mortel-Fronczak J, Rooda J (2008b) Test sequencing in complex manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part A Syst Humans 38(1):25–37
Boumen R, De Jong IS, Mestrom J, Van De Mortel-Fronczak J, Rooda J (2009) Integration and test sequencing for complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part A Syst Humans 39(1):177–187
Ciucci F, Honda T, Yang MC (2012) An information-passing strategy for achieving Pareto optimality in the design of complex systems. Res Eng Design 23(1):71–83
Collopy P (2012) A research agenda for the coming renaissance in systems engineering. In: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
Dai Z, Scott MJ, Mourelatos ZP (2003) Incorporating epistemic uncertainty in robust design. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
Eifler T, Engelhardt R, Mathias J, Kloberdanz H, Birkhofer H (2010) An assignment of methods to analyze uncertainty in different stages of the development process. In: ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
Emons W (1988) Warranties, moral hazard, and the lemons problem. J Econ Theory 46(1):16–33
Engel A, Barad M (2003) A methodology for modeling VVT risks and costs. Syst Eng 6(3):135–151
Engel A, Last M (2007) Modeling software testing costs and risks using fuzzy logic paradigm. J Syst Softw 80(6):817–835
Huang H-Z, Zhang X (2009) Design optimization with discrete and continuous variables of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. J Mech Design 131(3)
Kulkarni AU, Wernz C (2020) Optimal incentives for teams: a multiscale decision theory approach. Ann Oper Res 288:307–329
Kulkarni AU, Salado A, Wernz C, Xu P (2020) Is verifying frequently an optimal strategy? A belief-based model of verification. In: ASME 2020 International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2020), St. Louis, MO, (USA)
Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2009) The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, USA
Lewis K, Mistree F (1997) Modeling interactions in multidisciplinary design: a game theoretic approach. AIAA J 35(8):1387–1392
Mihm J (2010) Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Manage Sci 56(8):1324–1344
Mihm J, Loch C, Huchzermeier A (2003) Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Manage Sci 49(6):733–750
Nagano S (2008) Space systems verification program and management process: importance of implementing a distributed-verification program with standardized modular-management process. Syst Eng 11(1):27–38
Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Reyniers DJ (1992) Supplier-customer interaction in quality control. Ann Oper Res 34(1):307–330
Reyniers DJ, Tapiero CS (1995) Contract design and the control of quality in a conflictual environment. Eur J Oper Res 82(2):373–382
Salado A (2015) Defining better test strategies with tradespace exploration techniques and pareto fronts: application in an industrial project. Syst Eng 18(6):639–658
Salado A (2018) An elemental decomposition of systems engineering. In: 2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), IEEE
Salado A, Kannan H (2018) Properties of the utility of verification. In: IEEE International Symposium in Systems Engineering. Rome, Italy
Salado A, Kannan H (2019) Elemental patterns of verification strategies. Syst Eng 22(5):370–388
Salado A, Kannan H, Farkhondehmaal F (2018) Capturing the information dependencies of verification activities with bayesian networks. In: Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER). Charlottesville, VA, USA
Schlapp J, Oraiopoulos N, Mak V (2015) Resource allocation decisions under imperfect evaluation and organizational dynamics. Manage Sci 61(9):2139–2159
Schlosser J, Paredis CJ (2007) Managing multiple sources of epistemic uncertainty in engineering decision making. SAE Trans 1340–1352
Schumacher G, Schlapp J (2017) Delegated testing of design alternatives: the role of incentives and testing strategy. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3020025. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
Sentz K, Ferson S (2002) Combination of evidence in Dempster–Shafer theory, Citeseer
Shabi J, Reich Y (2012) Developing an analytical model for planning systems verification, validation and testing processes. Adv Eng Inform 26(2):429–438
Shabi J, Reich Y, Diamant R (2017) Planning the verification, validation, and testing process: a case study demonstrating a decision support model. J Eng Des 28(3):171–204
Sommer SC, Loch CH (2009) Incentive contracts in projects with unforeseeable uncertainty. Prod Oper Manage 18(2):185–196
Starbird SA (2001) Penalties, rewards, and inspection: provisions for quality in supply chain contracts. J Oper Res Soc 52(1):109–115
Tahera K, Earl C, Eckert C (2017) A method for improving overlapping of testing and design. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 64(2):179–192
Tahera K, Wynn DC, Earl C, Eckert CM (2019) Testing in the incremental design and development of complex products. Res Eng Design 30(2):291–316
Terwiesch C, Loch CH, Meyer AD (2002) Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: alternative coordination strategies. Organ Sci 13(4):402–419
Vermillion SD, Malak RJ (2018) A game theoretical perspective on incentivizing collaboration in system design. Disciplinary convergence in systems engineering research, Springer, Berlin, pp. 845–855
Vermillion SD, Malak RJ (2018) A theoretical look at the impact of incentives on design problem effort provision. In: ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
Walden DD, Roedler GJ, Forsberg K, Hamelin RD, Shortell TM (2015) Systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities. Wiley, USA
Wernz C, Deshmukh A (2010) Multiscale decision-making: bridging organizational scales in systems with distributed decision-makers. Eur J Oper Res 202(3):828–840
Wernz C, Deshmukh A (2012) Unifying temporal and organizational scales in multiscale decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 223(3):739–751
Wynn DC, Grebici K, Clarkson PJ (2011) Modelling the evolution of uncertainty levels during design. Intern J Interact Design Manuf (IJIDeM) 5(3):187
Xiao A, Zeng S, Allen JK, Rosen DW, Mistree F (2005) Collaborative multidisciplinary decision making using game theory and design capability indices. Res Eng Design 16(1–2):57–72
Xu P, Salado A (2019) A concept for set-based design of verification strategies. INCOSE Int Symp 29(1):356-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2019.00608.x
Yamada S, Ichimori T, Nishiwaki M (1995) Optimal allocation policies for testing-resource based on a software reliability growth model. Mathe Comput Model 22(10–12):295–301
Zhu K, Zhang RQ, Tsung F (2007) Pushing quality improvement along supply chains. Manage Sci 53(3):421–436