Conventional morphology performs better than morphokinetics for prediction of live birth after day 2 transfer

Aguilar, 2014, The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 28, 475, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.014 2011, Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 22, 632, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.001 Ambartsumyan, 2008, Aneuploidy and early human embryo development, Hum. Mol. Genet, 17, R10, 10.1093/hmg/ddn170 Armstrong, 2015, Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev, 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub2 Best, 2013, Does one model fit all? Testing a published embryo selection algorithm on independent time-lapse data, Hum. Reprod, 28, i87 Chamayou, 2013, The use of morphokinetic parameters to select all embryos with full capacity to implant, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet, 30, 703, 10.1007/s10815-013-9992-2 Ciray, 2014, Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group, Hum. Reprod, 29, 2650, 10.1093/humrep/deu278 Conaghan, 2013, Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial, Fertil. Steril, 100, 412, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.021 Cummins, 1986, A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transf, 3, 284, 10.1007/BF01133388 Edwards, 1984, Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility, J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transf, 1, 3, 10.1007/BF01129615 Goodman, 2016, Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial, Fertil. Steril, 105, 275, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.013 Hesters, 2008, Impact of early cleaved zygote morphology on embryo development and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: a prospective study, Fertil. Steril, 89, 1677, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.047 Kirkegaard, 2012, Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment, Hum. Reprod, 27, 1277, 10.1093/humrep/des079 Kirkegaard, 2012, A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet, 29, 565, 10.1007/s10815-012-9750-x Kirkegaard, 2014, Limitations of a time-lapse blastocyst prediction model: a large multicentre outcome analysis, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 29, 156, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.04.011 Kirkegaard, 2015, Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology, Fertil. Steril, 103, 323, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.003 Lemmen, 2008, Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 17, 385, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60222-2 Luke, 2014, Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology, Fertil. Steril, 102, 1338, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242 Lundin, 2001, Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF, Hum. Reprod, 16, 2652, 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2652 Meseguer, 2011, The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation, Hum. Reprod, 26, 2658, 10.1093/humrep/der256 Park, 2015, No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT, Hum. Reprod, 30, 268, 10.1093/humrep/deu316 Racowsky, 2009, Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?, Hum. Reprod, 24, 2104, 10.1093/humrep/dep198 Rhenman, 2015, Which set of embryo variables is most predictive for live birth? A prospective study in 6252 single embryo transfers to construct an embryo score for the ranking and selection of embryos, Hum. Reprod, 30, 28, 10.1093/humrep/deu295 Rubio, 2012, Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study, Fertil. Steril, 98, 1458, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1135 Rubio, 2014, Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope, Fertil. Steril, 102, 1287, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738 Sakkas, 1998, Early cleavage of human embryos to the two-cell stage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection as an indicator of embryo viability, Hum. Reprod, 13, 182, 10.1093/humrep/13.1.182 Shoukir, 1997, Early cleavage of in-vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: a novel indicator of embryo quality and viability, Hum. Reprod, 12, 1531, 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1531 Stylianou, 2012, Embryo morphology as a predictor of IVF success: an evaluation of theproposed UK ACE grading scheme for cleavage stage embryos, Hum. Fertil. (Camb.), 15, 11, 10.3109/14647273.2011.652251 Van Montfoort, 2004, Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers, Hum. Reprod, 19, 2103, 10.1093/humrep/deh385 Van Royen, 2001, Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model, Hum. Reprod, 16, 326, 10.1093/humrep/16.2.326 Yang, 2014, Selection of competent blastocysts for transfer by combining time-lapse monitoring and array CGH testing for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening: a prospective study with sibling oocytes, BMC Med. Genomics, 7, 38, 10.1186/1755-8794-7-38