Controversies surrounding Laud Humphreys’ tearoom trade: an unsettling example of politics and power in methodological critiques

Emerald - Tập 24 Số 3/4/5 - Trang 20-31 - 2004
MichaelLenza1
1University of Missouri, Columbia

Tóm tắt

Argues that Humphrey’s tearoom trade study, misinforms readers as much as it informs, regarding moral and ethical foundations for research with human subjects. States that Humphrey’s tearoom study made significant positive contributions to the population he studied. Concludes that few studies in sociology have accomplished as much in a single work.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Best J., 1990, Threatened Children: Rhetoric and Concern about Child Victims.

Bond K., 1978, American Sociologist, 13, 14

Faden Ruth R, A History and Theory of Informed Consent

Glazer Myron, Humphreys, L. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places., 213

Goffman Erving, 1961, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City

10.1111/j.1475-682X.1991.tb00272.x

10.17730/humo.14.3.j331478072157417

Humphreys Laud, 1970, Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places.

Humphreys Laud, 1975, Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places.

10.1037/h0036040

Mitchell Richard G, Secrecy and Fieldwork

10.1300/J082v30n02_01

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 24 Số 3/4/5

20-31

Thông tin tác giả