Contributions of the fourth spinal nerve to the brachial plexus without prefixation

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine - Tập 8 Số 6 - Trang 548-551 - 2008
R. Shane Tubbs1,2, Marios Loukas3,4, Mohammadali M. Shoja5, Mohammadreza Ardalan5, Nihal Apaydın6, Candice Myers3, Ghaffar Shokouhi7, W. Jerry Oakes1
11Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital, and
22Department of Cell Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama;
33Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, Grenada;
44Department of Education and Development, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
55Tuberculosis and Lung Research Center and
66Department of Anatomy, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
78Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; and

Tóm tắt

Object

The intradural contributions of the C-4 nerve rootlets have not been previously evaluated for their connections to the brachial plexus. The authors undertook a cadaveric study to evaluate the C-4 contributions to the upper trunk of the brachial plexus.

Methods

The posterior cervical triangles from 60 adult cadavers were dissected. All specimens that were found to have extradural C-4 contributions to the upper trunk of the brachial plexus were excluded from further study. In specimens found to have no extradural C-4 contributions to the brachial plexus a C1–T1 laminectomy was performed. Observations were made of any neural communications between adjacent spinal rootlets, specifically between C-4 and C-5.

Results

Nine (15%) of the 60 sides were found to have extradural C-4 contributions to the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. These sides were excluded from further study. No specimen was found to have a postfixed brachial plexus. Of the remaining 51 sides, 11 (21.6%) were found to have intradural neural connections between C-4 and C-5 dorsal rootlets and 1 (1.96%) had a connection between the ventral roots of C-4 and C-5. Communications between these 2 adjacent dorsal cervical cord levels were of 3 types. Type I was a vertical communication between the more horizontally traveling dorsal roots. Type II was a forked communication between adjacent C-4 and C-5 dorsal rootlets. The Type III designation was applied to connections between ventral rootlets. Although communications were slightly more frequent on left sides, this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

In ~ 20% of normally composed brachial plexuses (those with extradural contributions from only C5–T1) we found intradural C4–5 neural connections. Such variations may lead to misinterpretation of spinal levels in pathological conditions of the spinal axis and should be considered in surgical procedures of this region, such as rhizotomy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bergman RA, Thompson SA, Afifi AK: Catalog of Human Variation Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg, 127, 1984

Boyer P, 1981, Neurochirurgie, 27, 191

Dieckmann G, 1985, Appl Neurophysiol, 48, 339

Hollinshead WH, 1982, Anatomy for Surgeons, Vol 3: The Back and Limbs, 3

10.1002/aja.1000230205

Koizumi M, 1997, J Anat, 190, 447, 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19030447.x

Lang J, 1993, Clinical Anatomy of the Cervical Spine

Loukas M, 2007, Neurosurgery, 60, ONS13

Marzo JM, 1987, Spine, 12, 964, 10.1097/00007632-198712000-00002

Matejcik V, 2005, Bratisl Lek Listy, 106, 34

10.3171/jns.1959.16.2.0188

Perneczky A, 1980, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 52, 79, 10.1007/BF01400951

Rosner MJ, 1984, Neurosurgery, 14, 740, 10.1227/00006123-198406000-00017

10.3171/jns.1956.13.2.0190

Shin WR, 2006, J Korean Med Sci, 21, 119, 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.119

Sunderland S, 1978, Nerves and Nerve Injuries, 2

10.1097/00007632-200002010-00005

10.1159/000100632

10.1227/01.NEU.0000079485.24016.70

Yan J, 2000, Surg Radiol Anat, 22, 175, 10.1007/s00276-000-0175-3