Continuous auditing for web‐released financial information

Review of Accounting and Finance - 2010
Chi‐ChunChou1, C.Janie Chang2
1Department of Accounting Information, National Taipei College of Business, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
2Charles W. Lamden School of Accountancy, College of Business Administration, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe increasing provision of timely financial information through web‐based technology is expected to improve the quality of communication between a company and its stakeholders. However, the information asymmetry problem still exists since almost all “web‐releases” usually remain unaudited. The purpose of this paper is to propose conceptual and technical frameworks of continuous auditing to provide a solution for this problem. This solution could also move the traditional auditing forward to the new e‐auditing generation.Design/methodology/approachThis paper develops a conceptual framework to present why continuous auditing would dominate other auditing approaches in examining web‐based financial information. Using a 3 × 2 × 2 × 1 design, this study compares the economic efficiency of three auditing approaches under the joint‐combination of various disclosure types, materiality perceptions and information environments. A technical framework, the external continuous auditing machine, is derived from the conceptual framework to specify the generic procedures to perform the online control testing and the continuous substantive testing over web‐releases.FindingsContinuous auditing issues are scrutinized both theoretically and technically. Two main conclusions arise. First, the behavior model simulates various information disclosing and auditing environment and argues that the continuous auditing would be the most appropriate approach for web‐releasing assurance. Although the hypothesis derived from that model still needs further empirical supports, the anticipated sustaining is quite reasonable under the emergent web‐release practice.Originality/valueGiven the new era of online, real‐time business reporting, constructing a theoretical model and applying it to develop a technical model for implementing continuous audits for web‐releases provide significant contributions to the accounting/auditing professionals as well as researchers.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

AICPA and CICA (1999), Continuous Auditing.

APB (1970), “Basic concepts and accounting principles underlying financial statement of business enterprises”, APB Statement No. 4, par. 40, AICPA, New York, NY.

Bailey, A.D., Duke, G.L., Gerlach, J., Ko, C., Meservy, R.D. and Whinston, A.B. (1985), “TICOM and the analysis of internal controls”, Accounting Review, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 186‐200.

Bohem, B.W. (1981), Software Engineering Economics, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Bohrer, K.A. (1998), “Architecture of the San Francisco frameworks”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 156‐62.

Booch, G.J. and Rumgaugh, I.J. (1999a), The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Booch, G.J. and Rumgaugh, I.J. (1999b), The Unified Software Development Process, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Brereton, P., Budgen, D., Bennett, K. and Munro, M. (1999), “The future of software”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42 No. 12, pp. 78‐84.

Chambers, A.E. and Penman, S.H. (1984), “Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 22, pp. 21‐47.

Chi, W., Huang, H., Liao, Y. and Xie, H. (2009), “Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: evidence from Taiwan”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 359‐91.

Chou, C.L., Du, T. and Lai, V.S. (2007), “Continuous auditing with a multi‐agent system”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, pp. 2274‐92.

CICA (1972), CICA Handbook.

Collins, D.W. (1994), “Lack of timeliness and noise as explanations for the low contemporaneous return‐earnings association”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 289‐324.

DeAngelo, L. (1981), “Auditor independence, ‘Low Balling’, and disclosure regulation”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 113‐27.

Dye, R.A. (1991), “Informationally motivated auditor replacement”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 347‐74.

Elliott, R.K. (1995), “The future of assurance services: implications for academia”, Accounting Horizon, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 118‐27.

Elliott, R.K. (1998), “Assurance services and the audit heritage”, Auditing: Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 17, pp. 1‐7.

El‐Masry, E.E. and Reck, J.L. (2008), “Continuous online auditing as a response to the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 779‐802.

Ettredge, M.L., Li, C. and Sun, L. (2006), “The impact of SOX Section 404 internal control quality assessment on audit delay in the SOX era”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 1‐23.

Ettredge, M.L., Simon, D., Smith, D. and Stone, M. (1994), “Why do companies purchase timely quarterly reviews?”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 131‐55.

FASB (1979), “Financial accounting and changing price”, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 33, FASB, Stamford, CT.

Francis, J.R. and Yu, M.D. (2009), “Big 4 office size and audit quality”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 84 No. 5, pp. 1521‐52.

Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. (1995), Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object‐Oriented Software, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Gelinas, U.J. and Dull, R.B. (2008), Accounting Information Systems, 7th ed., South‐Western College Publishing, Boston, MA.

Hay, D. and Davis, D. (2004), “The voluntary choice of an auditor of any level of quality”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 37‐53.

Hussainey, K. (2009), “The impact of audit quality on earnings predictability”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 340‐51.

ICAEW (1975), The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Members, Handbook.

ISACA (2009), COBIT and Application Controls: A Management Guide, available at: www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=browse_by_category&CONTENTID=52294&TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm

Krishnan, J., Rama, D. and Zhang, Y. (2008), “Costs to comply with SOX Section 404 auditing”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 169‐86.

Murthy, U.S. (2004), “An analysis of the effects of continuous monitoring controls on e‐commerce system performance”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 29‐47.

Palmrose, Z. (1988), “An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality”, Accounting Review, Vol. 53, pp. 55‐73.

Palmrose, Z. (1989), “The relation of audit contract type to audit fees and hours”, Accounting Review, Vol. 64, pp. 488‐99.

Parnas, D.L. (1972), “On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15 No. 12, pp. 1053‐58.

Pressman, R.S. (1999), Software Engineering, 4th ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Searcy, D.L. and Woodroof, J.B. (2003), “Continuous auditing: Leveraging technology”, The CPA Journal, Vol. 73 No. 5, pp. 46‐8.

Simunic, D.A. and Stein, M.T. (1987), “Product differentiation in auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues”, The Canadian Certified General Accountants' Research Foundation, Burnaby.

Sinclair, N.A. and Young, C.Y. (1991), “The timeliness of half earnings announcement and stock returns”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, pp. 31‐52.

Stevens, W.P., Myers, G.J. and Constantine, L.L. (1974), “Structured design”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 115‐39.

Sundgren, S. (2009), “Perceived audit quality, modified audit opinions and the likelihood of liquidating bankruptcy among financially weak firms”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 203‐21.

Vasarhelyi, M.A. and Halper, F.B. (1991), “The continuous audit of online systems”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 110‐25.

Verrecchia, R. (1983), “Discretionary disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 179‐94.

Verrecchia, R. (1990), “Information quality and discretionary disclosure”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 12, pp. 365‐80.

Zeghal, D. (1984), “Timeliness of accounting reports and their informational content on the capital market”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 11, pp. 367‐80.

Columbus, L. (2000), Realizing e‐Business with Application Service Provision, Sams Technical Publishing, Indianopolis, IN.

Datar, S.M., Feltham, G.A. and Hughes, J.S. (1991), “The role of audits and audit quality in valuing new issues”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 30‐49.

Fayad, M.E. and Schmid, D.C. (1997), “Object‐oriented application frameworks”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40 No. 10, pp. 32‐8.

Givoly, D. and Palmon, D. (1982), “Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: some empirical evidence”, Accounting Review, Vol. 57, pp. 486‐508.

Groomer, S.M. and Murthy, U.S. (1989), “Continuous auditing of database applications: an embedded audit module approach”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 53‐69.

Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U. and Bedard, J.C. (2008), “Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 105‐26.

Kogan, A., Sudit, F. and Vasarhelyi, M.A. (1996), “Implications of Internet technology: on‐line auditing and cryptography”, IS Audit & Control Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 42‐7.

Larman, C. (1998), Applying UML and Patterns – An Introduction to Object‐Oriented Analysis and Design, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Pastena, V. (1979), “Some evidence on the SEC's system of continuous disclosure”, Accounting Review, Vol. 54, pp. 776‐83.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Review of Accounting and Finance

Thông tin tác giả