Contingent valuation with heterogeneous reasons for uncertainty

Resources and Energy Economics - Tập 33 - Trang 515-526 - 2011
Daniel R. Petrolia1, Tae-Goun Kim2
1Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Box 5187, Mississippi State, MS 39762, United States
2Division of Maritime Transportation Science, Korea Maritime University, 1 Dongsam-dong, Youngdo-Gu, Busan 606-791, South Korea

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alberini, 2003, Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 40, 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00010-4 Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4601 Broberg, 2008, An alternative interpretation of multiple bounded WTP data—certainty dependent payment card intervals, Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 555, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.09.001 Carson, 1998, Sequencing and valuing public goods, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, 314, 10.1006/jeem.1998.1050 Carson, 1998, Referendum design and contingent valuation: the NOAA panel's no-vote recommendation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 484, 10.1162/003465398557582 Carter, 2007 Champ, 1997, Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 151, 10.1006/jeem.1997.0988 Cummings, 1999, Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method, The American Economic Review, 89, 649, 10.1257/aer.89.3.649 Econometric Software, Inc., 2009. NLOGIT 4.0. Flachaire, 2007, Starting point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys, Resource and Energy Economics, 29, 183, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.05.003 Greene, 2000 Hite, 2002, Willingness to pay for water quality improvements: the case for precision application technology, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27, 433 Li, 1995, Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: an improved structural model for contingent valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 256, 10.1006/jeem.1995.1017 List, 2001, Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards, American Economic Review, 91, 1498, 10.1257/aer.91.5.1498 Loomis, 1998, Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl, Ecological Economics, 27, 29, 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00126-2 Lusk, 2003, Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 840, 10.1111/1467-8276.00492 Morton, R.A., 2007. Historic Changes in the Mississippi–Alabama Barrier Islands and the Roles of Extreme Storms, Sea Level, and Human Activities. US Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Geology Program, Open-File Report 2007-1161. Ready, 2001, How do respondents with uncertain willingness to pay answer contingent valuation questions?, Land Economics, 77, 315, 10.2307/3147126 Shaikh, 2007, Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: a comparison of empirical treatments, Ecological Economics, 62, 115, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.016 Stata Corporation, Inc., 2009. Stata 11.0. T. Baker Smith & Sons, Inc., 1997. Barrier Island Plan, Phase 1—Step K Report: Identification and Assessment of Management and Engineering Techniques, Louisiana Dept. of Natural Resources Contract No. 25081-95-02. U.S. Census Bureau, 2008. 2006 American Community Survey. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFFacts?_event=Search&_lang=en&_sse=on&geo_id=04000US28&_state=04000US28, last accessed October 3, 2008. Wang, 1997, Treatment of “don’t know” responses in contingent valuation surveys: a random valuation model, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 219, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0965 Welsh, 1998, Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, 170, 10.1006/jeem.1998.1043