Contextual control over lexical and sublexical routines when reading English aloud
Tóm tắt
Are the processes responsible for reading aloud single well-formed letter strings under contextual control? Despite the widespread contention that the answer to this question is “yes,” it has been remarkably difficult to provide a compelling demonstration to that effect. In a speeded naming experiment, skilled readers read aloud exception words (such asPint) that are atypical in terms of their spelling sound correspondences and nonwords (such asFlad) that appeared in a predictable sequence. Subjects took longer to name both words and nonwords when the item on the preceding trial was from the other lexical category, relative to when the preceding item was from the same lexical category. This finding is consistent with the relative contributions of lexical and sublexical knowledge being controlled. We note a number of different ways that this control could arise and suggest some directions for future research.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baluch, B., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 644–652.
Chateau, D., &Lupker, S. J. (2003). Strategic effects in word naming: Examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 139–151.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails.Psychological Bulletin,123, 71–99.
Kang, H., &Simpson, G. B. (2001). Local strategic control of information in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,29, 648–655.
Kinoshita, S., &Lupker, S. J. (2002). Effects of filler type in naming: Change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways?Memory & Cognition,30, 1277–1287.
Kinoshita, S., &Lupker, S. J. (2003). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: A reevaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 405–415.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.
Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 277–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Poulton, E. C. (1975). Range effects in experiments on people.American Journal of Psychology,88, 3–32.
Raman, I., Baluch, B., &Besner, D. (2004). On the control of visual word recognition: Changing routes versus changing deadlines.Memory & Cognition,32, 489–500.
Rastle, K., &Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 482–503.
Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (in press). Basic processes in reading: A critical review of pseudohomophone effects in naming and a new implemented computational account.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., &Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 405–414.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC-compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Shafiullah, M., &Monsell, S. (1999). The cost of switching between kanji and kana while reading Japanese.Language & Cognitive Processes,14, 567–607.
Tabossi, P., &Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.Memory & Cognition,20, 303–313.
Taylor, T. E., &Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 117–138.
Zevin, J. D., &Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 121–135.