Context in category scales: is “fully agree” equal to twice agree?

European Review of Applied Psychology - Tập 56 - Trang 223-229 - 2006
W. Cools1, J. Hofmans1, P. Theuns1
1Vakgroep Arbeids- and Organisatiepsychologie, Faculteit voor Psychologie en Educatiewetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Tài liệu tham khảo

Borg, 2003, The multidimensional character of perceived exertion for a maximal and submaximal cycle ergometer test Borg, 2003, An index for relations between perceptual magnitudes based on level-anchored ratio scaling Borg, 1976 Borg, 1982 Borg, 1987 Bruce, 1999, An internet role for the academic librarian?, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 30, 171, 10.1080/00048623.1999.10755091 Cardoso, 2001, The measurement of emotion intensity: a psychophysical approach Cools, 2003, The role of context in category scaling: placing anchors at equal distances Cools, 2004, The numeric estimation of verbal qualifiers measuring level of agreement: differences in response patterns Hofmans, 2004, The influence of reversing the anchors on the rating scale on the intensity perception of the anchors) Gescheider, 1988, Psychophysical scaling, Annual reviews Psychology, 39, 169, 10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.001125 Kampen, J., 2001. The adequacy and interpretation of models for ordinal association. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel, Brussels. Lodge, 1975, The psychophysical scaling and validation of political support scale, American Journal of Political Science, 19, 611, 10.2307/2110718 Lodge, 1976, The psychophysical scaling of political support in the real world, Political Methodology, 2, 159 Lodge, 1981 Rohrmann, 2003 Ross, 2003, Context effects in the scaling and discrimination of size Schaffer, 1989, Respondent behaviour in magnitude estimation, Journal of American Statistical Association, 84, 402, 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478784 Stevens, 1966, A metric for social consensus: methods of sensory psychophysics have been used to gauge the intensity of opinions and attitudes, Science, 151, 530, 10.1126/science.151.3710.530 Stevens, 1975 Teghtsoonian, 2004, Range effects how many and how important? Wegener, 1983, Category-rating and Magnitude estimation scaling techniques, Social methods and research, 12, 31, 10.1177/0049124183012001002