Contesting a Place in the Sun: On Ideologies in Foreign Markets and Liabilities of Origin

Ans Kolk1, Louise Curran2
1University of Amsterdam Business School, Plantage Muidergracht 12, 1018 TV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2Toulouse Business School, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

AFASE (2012a). Summary of the AFASE injury/Union Interest submission dated 29-10-2012. Alliance for Affordable Solar Energy. Retrieved from http://afase.org/en/action/anti-dumping-complaint?page=1 .

AFASE (2012b). The global solar value chain. Alliance for Affordable Solar Energy. Retrieved from http://afase.org/en/global-solar-value-chain .

AFASE (2013a). Global Market Situation. Retrieved from http://afase.org/en/global-market-situation .

AFASE (2013b). “Solar duties are destroying European jobs!” European PV Companies come to Brussels to contest Commission rose-tinted findings on the impact of duties. Brussels, 16 July.

AFASE (2013c). Implications of the EU’s acceptance of price undertakings by Chinese producer-exporters of modules, cells and wafers. Retrieved from: http://afase.org/en/media/price-undertakings-exempt-many-products-anti-dumping-duties .

AFASE (2013d). Proposed solar duties will severely hurt EU industry. Brussels, 4 June. Retreived from http://afase.org/en/media/proposed-solar-duties-will-severely-hurt-eu-industry .

AFASE (2013e). European Commission issues proposed definitive findings on anti-dumping and anti-subsidy for commenting. Brussels, August.

AFASE (2013f). Provisional anti-dumping duties put at risk thousands of jobs and billions of value added to the EU economy. 12 May.

Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2011). Going ‘green’: Trade specialization dynamics in the solar photovoltaic sector. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7275–7283.

Avsar, V., Karayalcin, C., & Ulubasoglu, M. A. (2013). State owned enterprises, inequality and political ideology. Economics and Politics, 25(3), 387–410.

Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 469–480.

Bass, K., Barnett, T., & Brown, G. (1999). Individual difference variables, ethical judgments and ethical behavioral intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 183–205.

Blau, J. (2013). Outlook cloudy for Germany’s Solar R&D. Research-Technology Management, 4–6.

Bowie, N. E. (1997). Ethical theory and business (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bowie, N., & Vaaler, P. (1999). Some arguments for universal moral standards. In G. Enderle (Ed.), International business ethics. Challenges and approaches (pp. 160–173). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Carbaugh, B., & St. Brown, M. (2012). Industrial policy and renewable energy: Trade conflicts. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 5(1), 1–16.

CEC. (2010). Trade growth and world affairs. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

CEC (2012a). EU initiates anti-dumping investigation on solar panel imports from China. Press Release Ref: MEMO/12/647. 6 September 2012. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

CEC. (2012b). Commission staff working document accompanying the document ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament 30th Annual Report from the Commission to the European Parliament on the EU’s Anti-Dumping, Anti-Subsidy and Safeguard activities (2011)’. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

CEC (2012c). Why the EU’s investigation into solar panel imports from China does not harm Europe’s climate goals. Fact Sheet, 10 September. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/149903.htm .

CEC (2013). EU imposes provisional anti-dumping tariffs on Chinese solar panels, Press release. 4 June 2013. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

CEC (2014). EU Transparency Registrer. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/info/homePage.do?locale=en .

Chaffin, J. (2012). Beijing faces Brussels action on telecoms aid. Financial Times.

Chaffin, J. (2013). Karel De Gucht: Frustrated and outflanked. Financial Times.

Chaffin, J. & Wiesmann, G. (2012). EU trade officials face China dilemma. Financial Times.

Chelli, M., & Gendron, E. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 187–203.

Chinese Mission (2013). Response of the spokesperson of the Chinese mission to the EU concerning the alleged ‘pressure’ exerted by China on EU member states on trade dispute. Chinese Embassy in Brussels, 30 May. Retrieved from http://www.chinamission.be/eng/sthd/t1045679.htm .

Choudhury, N. (2013). Unravelling the China-Europe trade war. PV Tech. 4 January. Retrieved from http://www.pv-tech.org/friday_focus/friday_focus_china_friend_or_foe_to_europe . Accessed 5 May 2015.

Clark, D. P. (2013). Shedding light on the recent US-China solar dispute. Global Economy Journal, 13(2), 251–259.

Compadre, C. (2013). La Chine met la pression sur le vin européen. Sud Ouest.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 957–979.

Curran, L. (2015). The impact of trade policy on global production networks: The solar panel case. Review of International Political Economy,. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2015.01.1014927 .

Daamen, B., Hennart, J.-F., Kim, D.-J., & Park, J.-Y. (2007). Sources of and responses to liability of foreignness: The case of Korean companies in the Netherlands. Global Economic Review, 36(1), 17–35.

Dahan, N. (2005). Can there be a resource-based view of politics? International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(2), 8–27.

De Gruyter, C. (2014). Samen sterk? Eigen belang lijkt sterker. NRC Handelsblad.

Denk, N., Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J.-F. (2012). Liabilities of Foreigness revisited: A review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of International Management, 18(4), 322–334.

Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.

Ding, Q (2011). Debt crisis may cause more trade friction. China Daily.

Donaldson, T. (1996). Values in tension: ethics away from home”. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 48–62.

Dunford, M., Kyoung, H. L., Weidong, L., & Yeung, G. (2013). Geographical interdependence, international trade and economic dynamics: The Chinese and German solar energy industries. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(1), 14–36.

Eckhardt, J. (2011). Firm Lobbying and EU Trade Policymaking: Reflections on the Anti-Dumping Case against Chinese and Vietnamese Shoes (2005–2011). Journal of World Trade, 45(5), 965–992.

Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2004). Distance Matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In M. Hitt & J. Cheng (Eds.), Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, complexity and relevance (Advances in International Management, Volume 16) (pp. 187–221). New York, NY: Emerald.

Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2009). Revisiting Liability of Foreignness: Socio-political costs facing Chinese multinationals in the United States. In K. Sauvant (Ed.), Investing in the United States. Is the US ready for FDI from China? (pp. 122–141). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

EP. (2012). EU and China: unbalanced trade? European Parliament resolution of 23 May 2012 P7_TA(2012) 0218. Brussels: European Parliament.

EPIA (2012). Global market outlook for photovoltaics until 2016. Brussels: European Photovoltaic Industry Association. Retrieved from http://www.epia.org/publications/epiapublications.html .

Erixon, F. (2014). Solar panels, telecommunication equipment—and the “modernisation” of EU trade defence policy, ECIPE Bulletin No. 5/2013, Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy.

Evans, S. (2012). Huawei and ZTE to face EU subsidies investigation. Computer Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.cbronline.com/news/tech/networks/networking/huawei-and-zte-to-face-eu-subsidies-investigation-280512 .

Evenett, S. (2013). China-EU solar panel trade dispute: Rhetoric versus reality. VOX. CEPR’s policy portal, 5 June. Retrieved from http://www.voxeu.org/article/china-eu-solar-panel-trade-dispute-rhetoric-versus-reality .

Evenett, S., & Vermulst, E. (2005). The politicisation of EC anti-dumping policy: Member states, their votes and the European Commission. The World Economy, 28(5), 701–717.

Feinberg, R. M., & Reynolds, K. (2006). The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 877–890.

Fine, G. A., & Sandstrom, K. (1993). Ideology in action: A pragmatic approach. Sociological Theory, 11(1), 21–38.

Gallagher, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2013). Innovation and technology transfer across global value chains: Evidence from China’s PV industry. Climate and Development Knowledge Network. Retrieved from http://fletcher.tufts.edu/News-and-Media/2013/07/01/Innovation-and-Technology-Transfer-Across-Global-Value-Chains .

Garmann, S. (2014). Do government ideology and fragmentation matter for reducing CO2 emissions? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 105, 1–10.

Grau, T., Huo, M., & Neuhoff, K. (2012). Survey of photovoltaic industry and policy in Germany and China. Energy Policy, 51, 20–37.

Guar, A., Kumar, V., & Sarathy, R. (2011). Liability of foreignness and internationalization of emerging market firms. In T. M. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), Dynamics of globalization: Location-specific advantages or liabilities of foreignness? (Advances in International Management, Volume 24) (pp. 211–233). New York, NY: Emerald.

Haase, M. & Raufflet, E. (2012). Ethical oil—on the role of ideology on business practices and the making of markets in the Canadian tar sands industry. In M. Haase & M. Kleinaltenkamp (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual macromarketing conference 2012, sustainable development of markets and marketing systems in a globalized world (pp. 377–391).

Haley, U. C. V., & Haley, G. T. (2013). Subsidies to Chinese industry. New York: Oxford University Press.

Haley, U. C. V., & Schuler, D. A. (2011). Government policy and firm strategy in the solar photovoltaic industry. California Management Review, 54(1), 17–38.

Halper, S. (2010). Beijing’s coalition of the willing. Foreign Policy, 180, 100–102.

Halper, S. (2011). The China threat. Foreign Policy, 185, 18–19.

Hou, X., & Ren, R. (2006). Cooperate or antagonize: The EU’s dilemma on anti-dumping and safeguard measures against China. China and World Economy, 14(6), 70–84.

Jormanainen, I., & Koveshnikov, A. (2012). International activities of emerging market firms: A critical assessment of research in top international management journals. Management International Review, 52, 691–725.

Klossek, A., Linke, B. M., & Nippa, M. (2012). Chinese enterprises in Germany: Establishment modes and strategies to mitigate the liability of foreignness. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 35–44.

Kolk, A. (2010a). Social and sustainability dimensions of regionalization and (semi)globalization. Multinational Business Review, 18(1), 51–72.

Kolk, A. (2010b). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility. Politeia, XXVI(98), 138–152.

Kolk, A. (2015). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business,. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010 .

Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2008). A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change. Learning from an ‘inconvenient truth’? Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1359–1378.

Kothari, T., Kotabe, M., & Murphy, P. (2013). Rules of the game for emerging market multinational companies from China and India. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 276–299.

Kumar, V., Mudambi, R., & Gray, S. (2013). Internationalization, innovation and institutions: The 3 I’s underpinning the competitiveness of emerging market firms. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 203–206.

Lewis, J. I. (2014). The rise of renewable energy protectionism: Emerging trade conflicts and implications for low carbon development. Global Environmental Politics, 14(4), 10–35.

Liu, Y. (2005). Anti-dumping actions and China. Journal of Financial Crime, 12(3), 272–289.

Luo, Y., & Mezias, J. (2002). Liabilities of foreignness: Concepts, constructs and consequences. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 217–221.

Mavroidis, P. (2013). Driftin’ too far from the shore—Why the test for compliance with the TBT agreement developed by the WTO Appellate Body is wrong and what should the AB have done instead. World Trade Review, 12(3), 509–553.

McGuire, S., Lindeque, J., & Suder, G. (2012). Learning and lobbying: Emerging market firms and corporate political activity in Europe. European Journal of International Management, 6(3), 342–362.

Mezias, J. M. (2002). Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: the case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 229–244.

Miller, S., & Eden, L. (2006). Local density and foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 341–355.

Moeller, M., Harvey, M., Griffith, D., & Richey, G. (2013). The impact of country-of-origin on the acceptance of foreign subsidiaries in host countries: An examination of the ‘liability-of-foreignness’. International Business Review, 22(1), 89–99.

Nahm, J., & Steinfeld, E. (2014). Scale-up nation: China’s specialization in innovative manufacturing. World Development, 54, 288–300.

Nordström, H. (2011). The political economy of EU anti-dumping policy: Decoding member states votes. Geneva: WTO. Retrieved from www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/gtdw_e/wkshop11_e/nordstrom_e.pdf .

Oliver, C. (2014). Brussels drops anti-subsidies case against Chinese groups. Financial Times.

Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Coping with liability of foreignness: Different learning engagements of entrant firms. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 339–350.

Pinkse, J., Bohnsack, R., & Kolk, A. (2014). The role of public and private protection in disruptive innovation: The automotive industry and the emergence of low-emission vehicles. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), 43–60.

Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinational enterprises and climate change: Exploring institutional failures and embeddedness. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 332–341.

Prognos (2013). The impact of anti-dumping and/or countervailing measures on imports of solar modules, cells and wafers from China on EU employment and value added. Basle, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://AFASE.org/en/action/prognos-pv-jobs-study .

ProSun (2012a). Injury indicators in the AD solar complaints. Memo. Retrieved from www.prosun.org .

ProSun (2012b). European solar manufacturers welcome European Parliament debate on Chinese dumping. Press Release, 23 November.

ProSun (2013a). Briefing Paper: Chinese dumping is seriously injuring the European solar industry and European suppliers, and endangers future solar installations in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en/media/media-downloads.html .

Prosun (2013b). Alarming situation for solar companies. Memo. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en/media/media-downloads.html .

ProSun (2013c). AFASE must stop talking nonsense. Chinese lobby group deliberately destabilizes European solar sector and politicians. Brussels, 17 July.

ProSun (2013d). European solar industry sues against compromise in trade dispute with China. Brussels, 27 July. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en/media/media-downloads.html .

ProSun (2013e). Anti-dumping measures secure employment in Europe, dumping destroys jobs. Press Release, 9 May. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en/media/media-downloads.html .

ProSun (2013f). Anti-dumping measures promote EU solar jobs and growth. New PwC study on the impact of duties on EU solar market. Press Release, 10 May.

ProSun (2014a). Massive violation of EU trade deal by Chinese solar manufacturers. Brussels, 5 June. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en.html .

ProSun (2014b). European Commission surrenders EU solar industry to China, while US imposes 50% tariffs. Brussels, 30 July. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en.html .

ProSun (2015). Illegal Solar Trade: New action against Chinese dumping. 29th April. Retrieved from http://www.prosun.org/en.html .

Prusa, T. & Skeath, S. (2001). The economic and strategic motives for anti-dumping filings. NBER Working Paper No. 8424.

PWC (2013). Review of Prognos’ study published in the course of the EU antidumping and anti-subsidy investigations on imports of photovoltaic products from China. Published by Prosun. Retrieved from < http://www.prosun.org/en/media/media-downloads.html .

Quitzow, R. (2015). Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions,. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.002 .

Ramachandran, J., & Pant, A. (2010). The liabilities of origin: An emerging economy perspective on the costs of doing business abroad. In T. M. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), The past, present and future of international business and management (Advances in International Management, Volume 23) (pp. 231–265). New York, NY: Emerald.

Rubini, L (2011). The subsidization of renewable energy in the WTO: Issues and perspectives. Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research (NCCR), Working Paper no 2011/32. Retrieved from http://www.nccr-trade.org/publication/subsidization-of-renewable-energy-in-the-wto/ .

Scott, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). China Threat? Evidence from the WTO. Journal of World Trade, 47(4), 761–782.

Sethi, D., & Judge, W. (2009). Reappraising liabilities of foreignness within an integrated perspective of the costs and benefits of doing business abroad. International Business Review, 18(4), 404–416.

SETI (2014). Q&A on the application of EU duties and undertakings on solar cells and modules from China. 31 October.

SETI (2015). Status of the EU anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings. Ongoing developments. 5 May 2015. Retrieved from http://seti-alliance.org/sites/default/files/status_of_the_eu_anti-dumping_and_anti-subsidy_proceedings.pdf .

Shortgen, F. (2009). A contextual view of Chinese enterprise internationalization. In I. Alon, J. Chang, M. Fetscherin, C. Lattemann, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), China rules (pp. 15–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

SolarWorld (2012). SolarWorld welcomes anti-dumping investigation by European Commission. Press release, 6 September 2012. Retrieved from http://www.solarworld.de/en/press/press-releases/corporate-news-ad-hoc/single-ansicht/article/solarworld-welcomes-anti-dumping-investigation-by-european-commission-1/ .

Stevens, C. E., & Shenkar, O. (2012). The liability of home: Institutional friction and firm disadvantage abroad. In L. Tihanyi, T. M. Devinney, & T. Pedersen (Eds.), Institutional theory in international business and management (Advances in International Management, Volume 25) (pp. 127–148). New York, NY: Emerald.

Trina Solar (2012). Annual Report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.trinasolar.com/eu/about-us/Management-Team.html .

Trina Solar (2013). Trina Solar Statement on preliminary determination of anti-dumping duty in EU. 5 June. Retrieved from http://www.trinasolar.com/eu/about-us/newinfo_276.html .

Tully, S. (Ed.). (2005). International documents on corporate responsibility. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Van de Graaf, T. (2013). Contradictions in EU-China clean energy relations. Paper prepared for the conference: The EU and Emerging powers. European Parliament. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.iee-fusl.eu/1068.html .

Verbeke, A. (2009). International business strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wines, W. A., & Hamilton, J. B. (2009). On changing organizational cultures by injecting new ideologies: The power of stories. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 433–447.

WWF (2013). Position paper on the proposed punitive tariffs on Chinese solar panels. WWF and Nature and Environment, 30 May. Retrieved from http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/ngo_positionpaper_solarpvchina_final.pdf . Accessed on 3 September 2013.

Yingli (2015). Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Retrieved from http://ir.yinglisolar.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=213018&p=irol-reportsannual .

Yu, C. (2013). The dispute between China and the EU over solar panels illustrates the misunderstandings that have plagued EU-China relations. LSE IDEAS, part of the LSE EUROPP series on the Dahrendorf Symposium, 11 November, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/ideas/2013/11/the-dispute-between-china-and-the-eu-over-solar-panels-illustrates-the-misunderstandings-that-have-plagued-eu-china-relations/ .

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.

Zaheer, S. (2002). The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 351–358.

Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–463.

Zhang, S., Andrews-Speed, P., Zhao, X., & He, Y. (2013). Interactions between renewable energy policy and renewable energy industrial policy: A critical analysis of China’s policy approach to renewable energies. Energy Policy, 62, 342–353.