Contested environmental policy infrastructure: Socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities

Environmental Impact Assessment Review - Tập 30 Số 5 - Trang 302-311 - 2010
M. Wolsink1
1Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agterbosch, 2008, Socio-political embedding of onshore wind power in the Netherlands and North Rhine-Westphalia, Technol Anal Strateg Manag, 20, 633, 10.1080/09537320802292958

Aitken, 2008, Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: the (not so) influential role of local objectors, J Environ Plan Manag, 51, 777, 10.1080/09640560802423566

Bergek, 2008, ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems, Technol Anal Strateg Manag, 20, 575, 10.1080/09537320802292768

Breukers, 2007, Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation, Env Polit, 16, 92, 10.1080/09644010601073838

Buijs, 2009, Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains, J Environ Manag, 90, 2680, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006

Carter, 2009, Sustainability appraisal and flood risk management, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 29, 7, 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.06.003

Cowell, 2006, Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability, Environ Plan C - Gov Policy, 24, 403, 10.1068/c0416j

Davies, 2008, Civil society activism and waste management in Ireland: the Carranstown anti-incineration campaign, Land Use Policy, 25, 161, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.04.002

Davoudi, 2009, Scalar tensions in the governance of waste: the resilience of state spatial Keynesianism, J Environ Plan Manag, 52, 137, 10.1080/09640560802666495

Dawson, 2006, Meeting the challenge of permanent nuclear waste disposal in an expanding Europe: transparency, trust and democracy, Env Polit, 15, 610, 10.1080/09644010600785226

deBruijn, K.M., 2005. Resilience and flood risk management. A system approach applied to lowland rivers. PhD Thesis, Technical University Delft.

deBruin, 2003, A simple start with far-reaching consequences, Irrig Drain, 52, 51, 10.1002/ird.81

deVries, 2009, Making space for water: spatial planning and water management in the Netherlands, 191

Dietz, 2003, The struggle to govern the commons, Science, 302, 1907, 10.1126/science.1091015

Disco, 2002, Remaking “Nature”: the ecological turn in Dutch water management, Sci Technol Human Values, 27, 206, 10.1177/016224390202700202

Dolfing, B., 2000. Waterbeheer geregeld? Een historisch bestuurskundige analyse van de institutionele ontwikkeling van de hoogheemraadschappen van Delfland en Rijnland 1600–1800. PhD thesis, University Leiden.

Elliott, 2009, “There's just hope that no one's health is at risk”: residents' reappraisal of landfill siting, J Environ Plan Manag, 52, 237, 10.1080/09640560802666578

Ellis, 2009, Expanding wind power: a problem of planning or of perception?, Plan Theory Pract, 10, 523

Enserink, 2004, Thinking the unthinkable — the end of the Dutch river dike system? Exploring a new safety concept for the river management, J Risk Res, 7, 745, 10.1080/13669870210166185

2009

Falkenmark, 2004, Towards integrated catchment management: opening the paradigm locks between hydrology, ecology and policy-making, Int J Water Resour Dev, 20, 275, 10.1080/0790062042000248637

Folke, 2005, Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annu Rev Environ Resour, 30, 441, 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

Frey, 2004, Introducing procedural utility: not only what, but also how matters, J Inst Theor Econ, 160, 377, 10.1628/0932456041960560

Gagnon, 1993, Can SIA empower communities?, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 13, 229, 10.1016/0195-9255(93)90034-9

Gallagher, 2008, Host community attitudes towards solid waste landfill infrastructure: comprehension before compensation, J Environ Plan Manag, 51, 233, 10.1080/09640560701864878

Gerrits, 2008, Complex bounded rationality in dyke construction path-dependency, lock-in in the emergence of the geometry of the Zeeland delta, Land Use Policy, 25, 330, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.09.001

Grimeaud, 2004, The EU water framework directive, Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law, 13, 27, 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2004.00381.x

Hocke, 2009, Concerned public and the paralysis of decision-making: nuclear waste management policy in Germany, J Risk Res, 12, 921, 10.1080/13669870903126382

Höppner, 2009, Trust — a monolithic panacea in land use planning?, Land Use Policy, 26, 1046, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.007

Howe, 2004, Like a fish out of water: the relationship between planning and flood risk management in the UK, Plan Pract Res, 19, 415, 10.1080/0269745052000343244

Jay, 2008

Johnson, 2009, Willing and able: explaining individuals' engagement in environmental policy making, J Environ Plan Manag, 52, 833, 10.1080/09640560903083772

Kamp, 2004, Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark, Energy Policy, 32, 1625, 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00134-4

Karjalainen, 2010, Negotiating river ecosystems. Impact assessment and conflict mediation in the cases of hydro-power construction, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 30, 319, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.004

Lauber, 2004, REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised community framework, Energy Policy, 32, 1405, 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00108-3

Lorenzoni, 2005, Dangerous climate change: the role for risk research, Risk Anal, 25, 1387, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00686.x

Mannarini, 2009, Six factors fostering protest: predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements, Polit Psychol, 30, 895, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00732.x

McCauley, 2009, Wasting energy? Campaigns against waste-to-energy sites in France, Env Polit, 18, 917, 10.1080/09644010903345694

Mumford, 2010, Consumer engagement in alternative energy — can the regulators and suppliers be trusted?, Energy Policy, 38, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.054

Nadai, 2010, Wind power planning, landscapes and publics, Land Use Policy, 27, 181, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.009

Nelson, 2007, Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework, Annu Rev Environ Resour, 32, 295, 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348

Neuvel, 2009, Flood risk management in Dutch local spatial planning practices, J Environ Plan Manag, 52, 865, 10.1080/09640560903180909

North, 1990

Nykvist, 2009, Are impact assessment procedures actually promoting sustainable development? Institutional perspectives on barriers and opportunities found in the Swedish committee system, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 29, 15, 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.04.002

Ohl, 2010, The mismatch between regional spatial planning for wind power development in Germany and national eligibility criteria for feed-in tariffs — a case study in West Saxony, Land Use Policy, 27, 243, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.004

Owens, 2004, Siting, sustainable development and social priorities, J Risk Res, 7, 101, 10.1080/1366987042000158686

Owens, 2004, New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research, Environ Plann A, 36, 1943, 10.1068/a36281

Pahl-Wostl, 2006, The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains, Ecol Soc, 11, 10.5751/ES-01542-110110

Parker, 1995, Floodplain development policy in England and Wales, Appl Geogr, 15, 341, 10.1016/0143-6228(95)00016-W

Pidgeon, 2008, Climate change or nuclear power — no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain, Glob Environ Change, 18, 69, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005

Price, 2000, Demand management — a basis for waste policy: a critical review of the applicability of the waste hierarchy in terms of achieving sustainable waste management, Sustain Dev, 8, 96, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(200005)8:2<96::AID-SD133>3.0.CO;2-J

Raadgever, 2008, Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology, Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 12, 1097, 10.5194/hess-12-1097-2008

Reiche, 2002, Aufstieg, Bedeutungsverlust und Re-Politisierung erneuerbare Energien, vol. 25, 27

Rootes, 2007, Acting locally: the character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilizations, Env Polit, 16, 722, 10.1080/09644010701640460

Roth, 2007, Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: the case of ‘calamity polders’, Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr, 98, 519, 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00419.x

Saarikoski, 2000, Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 20, 681, 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00059-7

Saarikoski, 2006, When frames conflict: policy dialogue on waste, Environ Plan C Gov Policy, 24, 615, 10.1068/c53m

Sabatier, 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe, J Eur Public Policy, 5, 98, 10.1080/13501768880000051

Sinclair, 2008, Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: critical reflections on 15years of research, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 28, 415, 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.11.001

Thelen, 1999, Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, Annu Rev Pol Sci, 2, 369, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369

Toke, 2008, Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the differences?, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 12, 1129, 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021

Tompkins, 2005, Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy, Environ Sci Policy, 8, 562, 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.012

Van Baren, NGE, 2001. Planhiërarchische oplossingen: een bron van maatschapplijk confict. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Van der Most, 2005, Dealing with uncertainty in flood risk assessment of dike rings in the Netherlands, Nat Hazards, 36, 191, 10.1007/s11069-004-4548-5

Vanclay, 2003, International principles for social impact assessment, Impact Assess Proj Apprais, 21, 5, 10.3152/147154603781766491

Walker, 2010, Environmental justice, impact assessment and the politics of knowledge: The implications of assessing the social distribution of environmental outcomes, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 30, 312, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.005

Warren, 2010, Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland, Land Use Policy, 27, 204, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010

Watson, 2007, Critical perspectives on integrated water management, Geogr J, 173, 297, 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00259.x

Weidner, 2002

Wester-Herber, 2004, Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts — the role of place-identity in risk perception, Environ Sci Policy, 7, 109, 10.1016/j.envsci.2003.12.001

Wiering, 2006, Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: ‘deep’ institutional change or adaptation strategy?, Hydrobiologia, 565, 327, 10.1007/s10750-005-5923-2

Wilson, 1996, Stick or carrot? The use of policy measures to move waste management up the hierarchy, Waste Manag Res, 14, 385, 10.1177/0734242X9601400406

Wolsink, 2003, Reshaping the Dutch planning system: a learning process?, Environ Plann A, 35, 705, 10.1068/a35173

Wolsink, 2004, Policy beliefs in spatial decisions: contrasting core beliefs concerning space making for waste infrastructure, Urban Stud, 41, 1669, 10.1080/0042098042000294619

Wolsink, 2006, River basin approach and integrated water management — governance pitfalls for the Dutch Space-Water-Adjustment Management Principle, Geoforum, 37, 473, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.07.001

Wolsink, 2007, Wind power implementation. The nature of public attitudes, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 11, 1188, 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005

Wolsink, 2010, Near-shore wind power. Protected seascapes, environmentalist's attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective, Land Use Policy, 27, 195, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004

Wolsink, 2003

Wolsink, 2010, Contrasting the core beliefs regarding the effective implementation of wind power. An international study of stakeholder perspectives, J Environ Plan Manag, 53

Wolsink, 2009, The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners' perspective to fairness and community commitment, J Environ Plan Manag, 52, 217, 10.1080/09640560802666552

Wüstenhagen, 2007, Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept, Energy Policy, 35, 2683, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001

Yin, 2009

Zito, 2003, Instrument innovation in an environmental lead state: ‘new’ environmental policy instruments in the Netherlands, Env Polit, 12, 157, 10.1080/09644010412331308234