Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 21 Số 5 - Trang 739-746 - 2012
Susan Magasi1, Gery W. Ryan2, Dennis A. Revicki3, William R. Lenderking3, Ron D. Hays4, Meryl Brod5, Claire Snyder6, Maarten Boers7, David Cella1
1Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 625 Michigan Ave., Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, Il 60611, USA
2RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
3United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA
4Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
5The Brod Group, Mill Valley, CA, USA
6Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
7Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit (VU) University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

AERA, APA, NCME. (1999). American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Standards for educational and psychological testing.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Food and Drug Administration guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register.

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during the first two years. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S3–S11.

Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1263–1278.

Lasch, K., Marquis, P., Vigneux, M., et al. (2010). PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1087–1096.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide though qualitative analysis. Washington, DC: Sage.

Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: G. Lincoln & M. Day (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Morse, J., Barnett, N., Mayan, M., Olson, K., Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, Article 2. URL: http//www,ualberta.ca/~ijqm.

Bowen, G. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137–152.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18, 59–82.

Rothman, M., Burke, L., Erickson, P., Leidy, N. K., Patrick, D. L., & Petrie, C. D. (2009). Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PROTask force report. Value in Health, 12, 1075–1083.

Triandis, H. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Hays, R. D., & Fayers, P. (2005). Evaluating multi-item scales. In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: Methods and practice (2nd ed., pp. 41–53). New York: Oxford University Press.

Revicki, D. A., Sorensen, S., & Wu, A. W. (1998). Reliability and validity of physical and mental health summary scores from the medical outcomes study HIV health survey. Medical Care, 36, 126–137.

Joeskog, K. G. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Hays, R. D., Revicki, D. A., & Coyne, K. S. (2005). Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 295–309.

Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Stull, D. E. (2008). Analyzing growth and change: Latent variable growth curve modeling with an application to clinical trials. Quality of Life Research, 17, 47–59.

Stull, D., Vernon, M. K., Legg, J. C., Viswanathan, H. N., Fairclough, D., & Revicki, D. A. (2010). Use of linear growth curve models for assessing the effects of darbepoetin alpha on hemoglobin and fatigue. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 31, 172–179.

Embretson, S., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S22–S31.

DeWalt, D., Rothrock, N. P., Yount, S. P., & Stone, A. A. P. (2007). on behalf of the PCG. Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S12–S21.