Content analysis: What are they talking about?

Computers & Education - Tập 46 Số 1 - Trang 29-48 - 2006
Jan-Willem Strijbos1, Rob Martens2, Frans J. Prins2, Wim Jochems2
1Section for Educational Studies, Department of Pedagogical Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, RB Leiden, The Netherlands and Open University of the Netherlands, Educational T ...#TAB#
2Open University of the Netherlands, Educational Technology, DL, Heerlen, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

*Archer, 2001, A framework for analysing critical thinking in computer conferences, 59

*Arnseth, 2001, Collaboration and problem solving in distributed collaborative learning, 75

*Armitt, 2002, The development of deep learning during a synchronous collaborative on-line course [Electronic version], 151

Aviv, R. (1999). Educational performance of ALN via content analysis. In Proceedings of the paper presented at the Sloan ALN Summer workshops (16–18 August). Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois.

*Baker, 2003, Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate, 11

Benbunan-Fich, 1999, Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment, Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 409, 10.1023/A:1008669710763

Chi, 1997, Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271, 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1

De Wever, 2005, Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review, Computers & Education, 46, 6, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005

*De Laat, 2002, Network and content analysis in an online community discourse [Electronic version], 625

Laat, 2003, Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community, Instructional Science, 31, 7, 10.1023/A:1022596100142

2001

*Erkens, 2001, Computer-supported collaboration in argumentative writing, 205

Elliot, 1999, Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215, 10.1348/014466599162782

Fahy, 2001, Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2, 10.19173/irrodl.v2i1.36

Fischer, 2002, Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools, Learning and Instruction, 12, 213, 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6

Gunawardena, 1997, Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397, 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG

*Häkkinen, 2001, Sharing and making perspectives in web-based conferencing, 285

Hara, 2000, Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course, Instructional Science, 28, 115, 10.1023/A:1003764722829

Harasim, 1993, Collaborating in cyberspace: Using computer conferences as a group learning environment, Interactive Learning Environments, 3, 119, 10.1080/1049482930030202

Harasim, 1995

Hare, 1994, Types of roles in small groups: A bit of history and a current perspective, Small Group Research, 25, 443, 10.1177/1046496494253005

Henri, 1992, Computer conferencing and content analysis, 117

Hewitt, 2003, How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 31, 10.2190/PMG8-A05J-CUH1-DK14

Hillman, 1999, A new method for analyzing patterns of interaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 13, 37, 10.1080/08923649909527023

*Hume, 2001, Metacognitive processes in problem solving with CSCL in mathematics, 301

*Kirschner, 2003, Validating a representational notation for collaborative problem solving, 163

*Komis, 2003, A study on heterogeneity during real-time collaborative problem solving, 411

Koschmann, 1996, Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction, 1

*Lally, 2001, Analysing teaching and learning interactions in a networked environment: Issues and work in progress, 397

*Lally, 2002, Cracking the code: Learning to collaborate and collaborating to learn in a networked environment [Electronic version], 160

*Lally, 2003, A quartet in E, 47

Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310

*Law, 2003, Developmental trajectory in knowledge building: An investigation, 57

*Lenell, 2001, Evaluating affordance short-circuits by reviewers and authors participating in on-line journal reviews, 406

*Ligorio, 2001, Interlocution scenarios for problem solving in an educational mud environment, 414

*Ligorio, 2002, Examining synchronous tutoring in a synchronous virtual world [Electronic version], 615

*Lipponen, 2001, Analyzing patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ online science discussions, 421

Lipponen, 2003, Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning, Learning and Instruction, 13, 487, 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7

Louca, 2003, Students’ collaborative use of computer-based programming tools in science: A descriptive study, 109

Madill, 2000, Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies, British Journal of Psychology, 91, 1, 10.1348/000712600161646

*Mäkitalo, 2001, Analyzing the mechanism of common ground in collaborative web-based interaction, 445

Miles, 1994

Mudrack, 1995, An examination of functional role behaviour and its consequences for individuals in group settings, Small Group Research, 26, 542, 10.1177/1046496495264005

*Mulder, 2003, Stimulating questioning behaviour, 421

*Muukkonen, 2001, Characteristics of university students’ inquiry in individual and computer-supported collaborative study process, 462

Neuendorf, 2002

Newman, 1995, A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning

*Pata, 2003, Framework for scaffolding the development of problem based representations by collaborative design, 189

Prins, 1998, Een nieuwe bijdrage tot de validatie van het (meta)cognitieve deel van de Inventaris Leerstijlen (ILS) [A new contribution to the validation of the (meta)cognitive part of the Inventory Learning Styles (ILS)], Pedagogische Studieën, 75, 73

Rasku-Puttonen, 2003, Is succesful scaffolding an illusion? – Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long-term learning project, Instructional Science, 31, 377, 10.1023/A:1025700810376

Riffe, 1998

Rourke, 2001, Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8

Rourke, 2004, Validity in quantitative content analysis, Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5, 10.1007/BF02504769

Schellens, 2002, Asynchrone discussiegroepen: Een onderzoek naar de invloed op cognitieve kennisverwerving [Asynchronous discussion groups: Investigating the influence on cognitive knowledge gain], Pedagogische Studieën, 79, 451

*Schwarz, 2001, Effects of argumentative activities on collective and individual arguments, 545

*Seitema-Hakkarainen, 2002, Computer support for participatory design – a pilot study [Electronic version], 652

2002

Stahl, 2002, Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL [Electronic version], 62

Strijbos, J. W. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands.

Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (2004a). What we know about CSCL: And what we do not (but need to) know about CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Vol. Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Vol. 3. What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. (pp. 245–259). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic/Springer Verlag.

Strijbos, 2004, Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning, Computers & Education, 42, 403, 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.004

Strijbos, 2004, The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups, Small Group Research, 35, 195, 10.1177/1046496403260843

*Suthers, 2003, Deictic roles of external representations in face-to-face and online collaboration, 173

*Svensson, 2002, Interaction repertoire in a distance education community [Electronic version], 648

*Tosonoglu-Blake, 2001, Mapping interactions in a computer conferencing environment, 609

*van Aalst, 2001, Beyond “sitting next to each other”: A design experiment on knowledge building in teacher education, 20

*Van Amelsfoort, 2003, Comparing graphical and textual preparation tools for collaborative argumentation-based learning, 5

Van Dijk, 1983

*Van Drie, 2003, Supporting historical reasoning in CSCL, 93

*Van Oostendorp, 2003, Role of icons and chat boxes in computer supported collaborative learning, 275

Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. A. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.

Wang, 2001, The construction of shared knowledge in an Internet-based shared environment of expeditions (iExpeditions), International Journal of Educational Technology

2003

Weinberger, 2005, A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 46, 71, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003