Contemporary Management of High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Current Urology Reports - Tập 11 - Trang 159-164 - 2010
Mark Garzotto1, Arthur Y. Hung2
1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, and the Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, USA
2Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, USA

Tóm tắt

The management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer remains a formidable challenge despite significant technical advances in surgery and radiation therapy. Treatment outcomes of radiation therapy are improved by the addition of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, whereas, with surgery, oncologic results are enhanced with either postoperative radiation therapy or androgen deprivation therapy in select cases. In high-risk prostate cancer, disease recurrence after primary therapy may occur at either distant or local sites. Ongoing studies are in the process of evaluating systemic therapy for the eradication of local and micrometastatic disease. Neoadjuvant therapies offer the opportunity to maximize local control as a path to improved outcomes and critically evaluate agent effectiveness in the target tissue. The treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer is in evolution. It is likely that the development of effective strategies based on understanding prostate tumor biology will lead to significant advances in the treatment of this disease.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225–249. Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Fine J: 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2005, 293:2095–2101. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, et al.: Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1310–1319. Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al.: Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1320–1328. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al.: Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998, 280:969–974. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al.: Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:7005–7012. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: Prediction tools: a tool for doctors and patients. Available at http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/5794.cfm. Accessed February 2010. Greene KL, Albertsen PC, Babaian RJ, et al.: Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. J Urol 2009, 182:2232–2241. Mohler JL: The 2010 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology on Prostate Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010, 8:145. Fuchsjager M, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A, et al.: The role of MRI and MRSI in diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-treatment follow-up for prostate cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2009, 7:193–202. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al.: Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2491–2499. Huang W, Li X, Morris EA, et al.: The magnetic resonance shutter speed discriminates vascular properties of malignant and benign breast tumors in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:17943–17948. •• Sonpavde G, Chi KN, Powles T, et al.: Neoadjuvant therapy followed by prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2007, 110:2628–2639. This paper concisely outlines the rationale and outcomes of recent studies using the neoadjuvant approach for high-risk prostate cancer. Future implications of ongoing studies are discussed. Lau WK, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML, et al.: Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables. J Urol 2002, 167:117–122. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, et al.: Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999, 281:1591–1597. Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al.: Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet 2002, 360:103–106. Roach M, Lu J, Pilepich MV, et al.: Four prognostic groups predict long-term survival from prostate cancer following radiotherapy alone on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 47:609–615. (Erratum appears in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 48:313 Note: Mohuidden M [corrected to Mohiuddin M].) Walsh PC: 2008 Whitmore Lecture: radical prostatectomy–where we were and where we are going. Urol Oncol 2009, 27:246–250. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, et al.: Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002, 167(2 Pt 1):528–534. Ward JF, Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, et al.: The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004, 172(4 Pt 1):1328–1332. Wagner M, Sokoloff M, Daneshmand S: The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer–therapeutic? J Urol 2008, 179:408–413. • Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH, et al.: Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2009, 55:1251–1265. The importance of an adequate lymph node dissection for both staging and therapeutic reasons are discussed. A thorough understanding of pelvic anatomy with attention to the spread of metastases is essential to properly performing this component of the prostatectomy. Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al.: Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005, 294:1233–1239. de Crevoisier R, Kuban D, Lefkopoulos D: Image-guided radiotherapy by in-room CT-linear accelerator combination [in French]. Cancer Radiother 2006, 10:245–251. Lawton CA, Winter K, Murray K, et al.: Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49:937–946. Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al.: Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:2516–2527. •• Messing EM, Manola J, Yao J, et al.: Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol 2006, 6:472–479. In this study, 3 years of androgen deprivation was compared with 6 months of treatment after radiation. This showed definitive improvements in overall and PCSM without an increase in cardiovascular morbidity, favoring the 3-year arm. Studer UE, Whelan P, Albrecht W, et al.: Immediate or deferred androgen deprivation for patients with prostate cancer not suitable for local treatment with curative intent: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 30891. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:1868–1876. Aus G, Abrahamsson PA, Ahlgren G, et al.: Three-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2002, 90:561–566. Gleave ME, Goldenberg SL, Chin JL, et al.: Randomized comparative study of 3 versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: biochemical and pathological effects. J Urol 2001, 166:500–506; discussion 506–507. Hurtado-coll A, Goldenberg SL, Klotz L, Gleave ME: Preoperative neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy in prostate cancer: the Canadian experience. Urology 2002, 60(3 Suppl 1):45–51; discussion 51. Rabbani F, Perrotti M, Bastar A, Fair WR: Prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy: effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 1999, 161:847–852. Soloway MS, Pareek K, Sharifi R, et al.: Neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy in cT2bNxMo prostate cancer: 5-year results. J Urol 2002, 167:112–116. Pilepich MV, Winter K, John MJ, et al.: Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 50:1243–1252. Nanda A, Chen MH, Braccioforte MH, et al.: Hormonal therapy use for prostate cancer and mortality in men with coronary artery disease-induced congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction. JAMA 2009, 302:866–873. Hricak H, Schoder H, Pucar D, et al.: Advances in imaging in the postoperative patient with a rising prostate-specific antigen level. Semin Oncol 2003, 30:616–634. Scattoni V, Montorsi F, Picchio M, et al.: Diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004, 93:680–688. Stephenson AJ, Shariat SF, Zelefsky MJ, et al.: Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2004, 291:1325–1332. Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L, et al.: Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 2005, 366:572–578. • Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al.: Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006, 296:2329–2335. • Swanson GP, Hussey MA, Tangen CM, et al.: Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:2225–2229. •• Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al.: Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2009, 181:956–962. •• Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al.: Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:1513–1520. The above four papers highlight the need to improve upon local therapies for prostate cancer, as the risk of local recurrence is over 50% in high-risk cases. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al.: Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:1502–1512. Patel AR, Sandler HM, Pienta KJ: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0521: a phase III randomized trial of androgen suppression and radiation therapy versus androgen suppression and radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy with docetaxel/prednisone for localized, high-risk prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2005, 4:212–214. Montgomery B, Lavori P, Garzotto M, et al.: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program study 553: chemotherapy after prostatectomy, a phase III randomized study of prostatectomy versus prostatectomy with adjuvant docetaxel for patients with high-risk, localized prostate cancer. Urology 2008, 72:474–480. Hussain M, Smith DC, El-Rayes BF, et al.: Neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine chemotherapy in high-risk/locally advanced prostate cancer. Urology 2003, 61:774–780. Konety BR, Eastham JA, Reuter VE, et al.: Feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for patients with high risk or locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a phase I/II study. J Urol 2004, 171(2 Pt 1):709–713. Chi KN, Chin JL, Winquist E, et al.: Multicenter phase II study of combined neoadjuvant docetaxel and hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2008, 180:565–570; discussion 570 Eastham JA, Kelly WK, Grossfeld GD, Small EJ: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203: a randomized phase 3 study of radical prostatectomy alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk localized disease. Urology 2003, 62(Suppl 1):55–62. Garzotto M, Higano CS, O’Brien C, et al.: Phase 1/2 study of preoperative docetaxel and mitoxantrone for high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer 2010 Feb 8 (Epub ahead of print). Qian DZ, Huang CY, O’Brien CA, et al.: Prostate cancer-associated gene expression alterations determined from needle biopsies. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:3135–3142. Qian DZ, Rademacher BL, Pittsenbarger J, et al.: CCL2 is induced by chemotherapy and protects prostate cancer cells from docetaxel-induced cytotoxicity. Prostate 2010, 70:433–442. Zoubeidi A, Chi K, Gleave M: Targeting the cytoprotective chaperone, clusterin, for treatment of advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res Feb 9 (Epub ahead of print).