Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aertsens, 2009, Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review, Br. Food J., 111, 1140, 10.1108/00070700910992961
American Meat Institute (AMI), Food Marketing Institute (FMI), 2010. The Power of Meat – An in-depth Look at Meat through the Shoppers’ Eyes. Joint Report from AMI/FMI, Arlington, VA, 77 p.
Aprile, 2012, Consumers’ valuation of food quality labels: the case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 36, 158, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01092.x
Bellows, 2008, Understanding consumer interest in organics: production values vs. purchasing behavior, J. Agric. Food Ind. Org., 6
Bennett, 2012, A method for the economic valuation of animal welfare benefits using a single welfare score, Anim. Welfare, 21, 125, 10.7120/096272812X13345905674006
Bonnet, 2001, Assessing consumer response to Protected Designation of Origin labelling: a mixed multinomial logit approach, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 28, 433, 10.1093/erae/28.4.433
Bracke, 2005, Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 18, 27, 10.1007/s10806-004-3085-2
Briggeman, 2011, Preferences for fairness and equity in the food system, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 38, 1, 10.1093/erae/jbq033
Campbell, 2013, Combining discrete and continuous mixing distributions to identify niche markets for food, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 40, 287, 10.1093/erae/jbs018
Caputo, 2013, Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labeling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study, Aust. J. Agric. Res. Econ., 57, 465, 10.1111/1467-8489.12014
Carbon Trust, 2012. Creating Change through Carbon Footprinting. <http://www.carbontrust.com/news/2012/02/creating-change-through-carbon-footprinting>.
Carlsson, 2005, Consumer preferences for food product quality attributes from Swedish agriculture. AMBIO, J. Human Environ., 34, 366, 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.366
Carlsson, 2007, Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 34, 321, 10.1093/erae/jbm025
de Jonge, 2013, Meeting heterogeneity in consumer demand for animal welfare: a reflection on existing knowledge and implications for the meat sector, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 26, 629, 10.1007/s10806-012-9426-7
de Jonge, 2013, The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare, Poult. Sci., 92, 3080, 10.3382/ps.2013-03334
DEFRA, 2010. Eggs and Poultry Marketing Standards – Frequently asked Questions. <http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/food/industry/sectors/eggspoultry/faq/marketing.htm#psmts>.
Dransfield, 2005, Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production, Meat Sci., 69, 61, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.006
European Commission (EC), 2007a. European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91. Off. J. Eur. Union, vol. L189, pp. 1–23.
European Commission (EC), 2007b. Special Eurobarometer 270: Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare. Publication March 2007. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
European Commission (EC), 2008a. European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008 of 5 September 2008. Laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Official J. Eur. Union, vol. L250, pp. 1–84.
European Commission (EC), 2008b. European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 543/2008 of 16 June 2008. Laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1234/2007 as regards the marketing standards for poultry meat. Off. J. Eur. Union, vol. L157, pp. 46–87.
European Commission (EC), 2009a. Feasibility study on animal welfare labelling and establishing a community reference centre for animal protection and welfare. Part 1: Animal Welfare Labelling. Final report. Directorate-General for Health & Consumer Protection. Brussels. [WWW document]. <http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/aw_labelling_report_part1.pdf> (accessed 05.01.13).
European Commission (EC), 2009b. Flash Eurobarometer 256: Europeans’ attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production. Publication July 2009. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
European Commission (EC), 2012a. Special Eurobarometer 389: European Attitudes towards Food Security, Food Quality and the Countryside. <http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_389_en.pdf> (accessed 12.09.13).
European Commission (EC), 2012b. Policies to Encourage Sustainable Consumption. Technical report-2012-061. <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/report_22082012.pdf>.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow. Environmental Issues and Options. Rome, FAO, 390 pp.
FiBL and IFOAM 2013. The world of organic agriculture 2013. Statistics and emerging trends. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland; International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany.
Foster, C., Green, K., Bleda, M., Dewick, P., Evans, B., Flynn, A., Mylan, J., 2006. Environmental Impacts of Food Production and Consumption: A Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Manchester Business School. Defra, London [WWW document]. <http://www.ifr.ac.uk/waste/Reports/DEFRA-Environmental%20Impacts%20of%20Food%20Production%20%20Consumption.pdf> (accessed 05.01.13).
Gadema, 2011, The use and usefulness of carbon labelling food: a policy perspective from a survey of UK supermarket shoppers, Food Policy, 36, 815, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.08.001
Gesellschaft fur Konsumforschung (GfK), 2012. Consumer Scan Panel Data 2012. Brussels: GfK Consumer Scan.
Gifford, 2011, The effect of information on consumers’ willingness to pay for natural and organic chicken, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 35, 282, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00929.x
Gracia, 2011, Valuing an EU animal welfare label using experimental auctions, Agric. Econ., 42, 669, 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00543.x
Grebitus, 2013, Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food, Ecol. Econ., 88, 67, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.006
Gunduz, 2011, Consumer’s willingness to pay for organic chicken meat in Samsun province of Turkey, J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 10, 334, 10.3923/javaa.2011.334.340
Hanemann, 1984, Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand, Econometrica, 52, 541, 10.2307/1913464
Hanss, 2012, Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 36, 678, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01045.x
Hartikainen, H., Roininen, T., Katajajuuri, J.M., Pulkkinen, H., 2013. Finnish consumer perceptions of carbon footprints and carbon labelling of food products. J. Clean. Product (in press) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.018.
Hensher, 2005
Ingenbleek, 2012, EU animal welfare policy: developing a comprehensive policy framework, Food Policy, 37, 690, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.001
Janssen, 2012, Product labelling in the market for organic food: consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos, Food Qual. Prefer., 25, 9, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004
Johnson, 2013, Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force, Value Health, 16, 3, 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223
Just Bare, 2010. The carbon footprint of Just BARE boneless skinless chicken breast. Life cycle assessment summary report. [WWW document]. <http://www.gnpbusiness.com/files/Just_BARE_SummaryLCAReport_FNL6-30-11.pdf> (accessed 05.01.13).
Koistinen, 2013, The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meat, Food Qual. Prefer., 29, 126, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.007
Krystallis, 2006, Is there a real difference between conventional and organic meat? Investigating consumers’ attitudes towards both meat types as an indicator of organic meat’s market potential, J. Food Prod. Market., 12, 47, 10.1300/J038v12n02_04
Lagerkvist, 2011, A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 38, 55, 10.1093/erae/jbq043
Loureiro, 2001, Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labeled, and regular apples, J. Agric. Res. Econ., 26, 404
Lusk, 2003, Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 85, 16, 10.1111/1467-8276.00100
McFadden, 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, 105
Michel, 2011, Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes, J. Food Sci., 76, S469, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02354.x
Mondelaers, 2009, Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products, Br. Food J., 111, 1120, 10.1108/00070700910992952
Morey, 2003, A simple method of incorporating income effects into logit and nested-logit models: theory and application, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 85, 248, 10.1111/1467-8276.00116
Naspetti, 2012, Organic meat production in Europe: market and regulation, 53
Nocella, 2012, Eliciting consumer preferences for certified animal friendly foods: can elements of the theory of planned behavior improve choice experiment analysis?, Psychol. Market., 29, 850, 10.1002/mar.20569
O’Donovan, 2002, Irish consumer preference for organic meat, Br. Food J., 104, 353, 10.1108/00070700210425778
Onozaka, 2011, Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A conjoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claim, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 93, 693, 10.1093/ajae/aar005
Pouta, 2010, Consumer choice of broiler meat: the effects of country of origin and production methods, Food Qual. Pref., 21, 539, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.02.004
Samborski, 2013
Scarpa, 2004, Market segmentation via mixed logit: extra-virgin olive oil in urban Italy, J. Agric. Food Ind. Org., 2
Scarpa, 2008, Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why, Aust. J. Agric. Res. Econ., 52, 253, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00436.x
Scarpa, 2010, Willingness to pay for renewable energy: primary and discretionary choice of British household for micro-generation technologies, Energy Econ., 32, 129, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004
Scarpa, 2005, Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments, 247
Scarpa, 2007, Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents rationality in a choice experiment, Land Econ., 83, 617, 10.3368/le.83.4.617
Scarpa, 2007, The value of collective reputation for environmentally-friendly production methods: the case of Val di Gresta, J. Agric. Food Ind. Org., 5
Scarpa, 2013, Inferred and stated attribute non-attendance in food choice experiments, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 95, 165, 10.1093/ajae/aas073
Schleenbecker, 2013, Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review, Appetite, 71, 420, 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.020
Silva, 2011, Revisiting cheap talk with new evidence from a field experiment, J. Agric. Res. Econ., 36, 280
Soil Association, 2007. Welfare standards for organic and ‘free-range’ chickens and eggs. Information Sheet. Soil Association, Bristol.
Soil Association, 2013. Animal Welfare – Chickens and Turkeys. <http://www.soilassociation.org/animalwelfare/chickenandturkeys>.
Street, 2007
Swanson, J.C., Mench, J.A., 2000. Animal Welfare: Consumer Viewpoints. [WWW document]. <http://animalscience.ucdavis.edu/Avian/swanson.pdf> (accessed 05.01.13).
Train, 2003
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2013. Sustainability Claims Portal. <http://www.unctad.info/en/Sustainability-Claims-Portal/> (accessed 06.06.13).
Van Loo, 2010, Effect of organic poultry purchase frequency on consumer attitudes toward organic poultry meat, J. Food Sci., 75, S384, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01775.x
Van Loo, 2011, Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic chicken breast: Evidence from choice experiment, Food Qual. Prefer., 22, 603, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.003
Van Loo, 2012, Organic meat marketing, 67
Van Loo, 2013, Consumer attitudes, knowledge and consumption of organic yoghurt, J. Dairy Sci., 96, 2118, 10.3168/jds.2012-6262
Vanhonacker, 2009, Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not, Poult. Sci., 88, 2702, 10.3382/ps.2009-00259
Vanhonacker, 2014, Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: Challenges and opportunities, J. Agr. Environ. Ethics, 27, 153, 10.1007/s10806-013-9479-2
Vanhonacker, 2008, Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?, Livest. Sci., 116, 126, 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.017
Vanhonacker, 2009, Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production, Livest. Sci., 123, 16, 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.09.023
Vanhonacker, 2013, Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices, Appetite, 62, 7, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.003
Verbeke, 2005, Agriculture and the food industry in the information age, Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ., 32, 347, 10.1093/eurrag/jbi017
Verbeke, 2006, Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: an application of ordered probit models to beef labels, Food Qual. Prefer., 17, 453, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.010
Vermeir, 2006, Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude – behavioral intention” gap, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 19, 169, 10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3
Zander, 2010, Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food, Food Qual. Prefer., 21, 495, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006