Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessment

Health Economics (United Kingdom) - Tập 12 Số 8 - Trang 609-628 - 2003
Richard Smith1
1Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy & Practice, University of East Anglia, UK

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Contingent valuation (CV) has been criticised for being too hypothetical, with expressed values bearing little relation to actual values. The magnitude of this divergence, however, depends upon how realistic and believable the contingent market is. This paper presents an overview of five key aspects in the construction of the contingent market: (i) scenario development and presentation; (ii) payment vehicle; (iii) expression of risk; (iv) time period of valuation; and (v) survey administration. CV studies in health care since 1985, totalling 111, are critically reviewed with respect to these five aspects. It is concluded that CV studies in health care have performed poorly in the construction, specification and presentation of the contingent market, and that there has been little, if any, improvement in this respect over the last 15 years. Suggestions are made concerning why this may be the case, and how the construction of the contingent market may be improved in future. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1017/S0266462300006280

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<313::AID-HEC350>3.0.CO;2-B

Carson RT, 1993, Natural Resource Damage Assessment

Mitchell R, 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method

10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50007-9

10.1177/0272989X0002000205

10.1108/S0573-8555(1993)0000220008

Bishop RC, 1986, Valuing Environmental Goods. An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method

MitchellRC CarsonR.Current issues in the de‐sign administration and analysis of contingent valuation surveys. Working Paper Department of Economics University of California San Diego CA 1993.

10.1007/BF00056166

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199611)5:6<531::AID-HEC235>3.0.CO;2-J

10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00117-8

10.1177/096914139400100203

10.1136/jmg.32.4.282

10.1016/0168-8510(92)90163-6

10.1017/S0266462300013787

10.1177/0272989X9801800311

10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10945.x

10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.181

10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.791

10.1017/S0266462300102089

10.1016/0168-8510(95)00723-6

10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00044-1

10.2307/2234196

10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00024-7

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::AID-HEC262>3.0.CO;2-N

10.1017/S0266462300161227

10.1002/1099-1050(200006)9:4<295::AID-HEC520>3.0.CO;2-D

10.1002/hec.4730020407

10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00570.x

10.1097/00005650-199004000-00004

MillerT GuriaJ.The value of statistical life in New Zealand. Land Transport Division Ministry of Transport Wellington New Zealand 1991.

10.1177/0272989X8400400207

Schoemaker PJH, 1982, The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations, J Econ Lit, 20, 529

10.1126/science.7455683

10.1056/NEJM198205273062103

10.1016/0895-4356(93)90011-O

Jones‐Lee MW, 1989, The Economics of Safety and Physical Risk

Arrow K, 1993, Report of the NOAA panel of contingent valuation, Fed Regist, 58, 4601

10.1016/0014-2921(72)90001-3

10.2307/3146172

10.1016/0095-0696(80)90018-2

10.2307/1240202

Brookshire DS, 1981, Advances in Applied Microeconomics

10.2307/1241209

10.2307/1880746

10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00004-X

Cummings RG, 1986, Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method

10.1016/0167-6296(93)90006-Z

DonaldsonC ThomasR TorgersonDJ.Open‐ended versus payment scale approaches to eliciting willingness to pay. Discussion paper 01/95 Health Economics Research Unit Departments of Public Health and Economics University of Aberdeen Aberdeen 1995.

Drummond MF, 1997, Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes

10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1<39::AID-HEC563>3.0.CO;2-E

10.2105/AJPH.76.4.392

Thompson MS, 1982, Values and Long Term Care

10.4159/harvard.9780674436848

10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9

10.2307/1914185

10.1146/annurev.eg.01.110176.003213

10.1017/CBO9780511582424

10.2307/2297712

Arrow K, 1994, Natural resource damage assessments: proposed rules, Fed Regist, 59, 1062