Constructing “world-class” as “global”: a case study of the National University of Singapore

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 12 - Trang 225-238 - 2013
Christine Anita Xavier1, Lubna Alsagoff1
1National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

Tóm tắt

This article investigates the ways in which newly-established higher education institutions (HEIs) position themselves as “world-class” through constructing themselves as “global”. With the escalating “free market” and competitive forces arising from the marketization of education, most universities see a construction of themselves as global universities as a necessity, where the global mark is valued as a signal of quality across markets and thus positions the universities as world-class. This study specifically examines how one very successful emerging university, the National University of Singapore, constructs and promotes itself as a global institution through three strategies.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290–305. Altbach, P. G. (2004). The costs and benefits of world-class universities. Retrieved May 1, 2010, from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/JF/Feat/altb.htm. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world class research universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Altbach, P. G., & Teichler, U. (2001). Internationalization and exchanges in a globalized university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5, 5–25. Appadurai, A. (2001). Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Blass, E. (2009). From globalisation to internationalisation: Stepping back to move forwards in progressing higher education in overseas markets. The International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 175–183. Brustein, W. I. (2007). The global campus: Challenges and opportunities for higher education in North America. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 382–391. Cantwell, B., & Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2009). Four stories: Confronting contemporary ideas about globalisation and internationalisation in higher education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 7(3), 289–306. Chan, D., & Lo, W. (2008). University restructuring in East Asia: Trends, challenges and prospects. Policy Futures in Education, 6(5), 641–652. Chan, D., & Ng, P. T. (2008). Similar agendas, diverse strategies: The quest for a regional hub of higher education in Hong Kong and Singapore. Higher Education Policy, 21, 487–503. Chua, M. H. (1996, September 22). PM Goh to NUS and NTU: Aim to become world class. The Straits Times. Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York: HarperCollins. Economic Development Board, Singapore. (2009). Dynamic global city. Retrieved April 8, 2010, from http://www.edb.gov.sg/edb/sg/en_uk/index/why_singapore/dynamic_global_city.html. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Gopinathan, S., & Lee, M. H. (2011). Challenging and co-opting globalisation: Singapore’s strategies in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3), 287–299. Holt, D. B., Quelch, J. A., & Taylor, E. L. (2004). Managing the global brand. In J. Quelch & R. Deshpande (Eds.), The global market: Developing a strategy to manage across borders (pp. 180–201). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Huang, M. (2012). Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings. Research Evaluation, 21, 71–78. Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patsopoulos, N. A., Kavvoura, F. K., Tatsioni, A., Evangelou, E, Kouri, J., et al. (2007). International ranking systems for universities and institutions: A critical appraisal. BMC Medicine, 5(30). Retrieved July 15, 2012, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1741-7015-5-30.pdf. Keat, R. (1991). Introduction: Starship Britain or universal enterprise. In R. Keat & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), Enterprise culture (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge. King, R. (2004). Globalization and the university. In R. King, with contributions from Svava Bjarnason ... [et al.] (Eds.), The university in the global age (pp. 45–66). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8, 5–31. Lam, Y. Y. (2010). Impact of globalization on higher education: An empirical study of education policy and planning of design education in Hong Kong. International Education Studies, 3(4), 73–85. Lee, W. O. (2008). The repositioning of higher education from its expanded visions: Lifelong learning, entrepreneurship, internationalization and integration. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7, 73–83. Lee, M. H., & Gopinathan, S. (2003). Reforming university education in Hong Kong and Singapore. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(2), 167–182. Lee, M. H., & Gopinathan, S. (2007). University restructuring in Singapore: Amazing! Or a maze? Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 6(1), 107–141. Levin, R. (2006, August 21). World of knowledge. Newsweek. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from http://www.newsweek.com/2006/08/20/world-of-knowledge.html. Ma, W. (2008). The University of California at Berkeley: An emerging global research university. Higher Education Policy, 21, 65–81. Mok, K. H. (2010). When state centralism meets neo-liberalism: Managing university governance change in Singapore and Malaysia. Higher Education, 60, 419–440. Mok, K. H., & Tan, J. (2004). Globalization and marketization in education: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Singapore. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Niland, J. (2000). The challenge of building world class universities in the Asian region. On Line opinion (Australia’s e-journal of social and political debate). Retrieved August 6, 2012, from http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=997. Ng, P. T. (2011). Singapore’s response to the global war for talent: Politics and education. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 262–268. Podolny, J. M. (2005). Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rauhvargers, A. (2011). Global university rankings and their impact. European University Association Report on Rankings 2011. Retrieved May 8, 2012, from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publications_homepage_list/Global_University_Rankings_and_Their_Impact.sflb.ashx. Robb, S., & Bullen, E. (2004). A provocation. In J. Kenway, E. Bullen, & S. Robb (Eds.), Innovation and tradition: The arts, humanities and the knowledge economy (pp. 1–9). New York: Peter Lang. Robinson, D. (2005). GATS and the OECD/UNESCO guidelines and the academic profession. International Higher Education, 39, 6–7. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence: Lessons of experience. In P. G. Altbach & J. Salmi (Eds.), The road to academic excellence: The making of world class research Universities (pp. 323–348). Washington, DC: The World Bank. Sidhu, R. (2009). The brand name research university goes global. Higher Education, 57(2), 125–140. Sidhu, R., Ho, K.-C., & Yeoh, B. (2011). Emerging education hubs: The case of Singapore. Higher Education, 61(1), 23–40. Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2003). Communicating a global reach: Inflight magazines as a globalizing genre in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 579–605. Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “Entrepreneurial University” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941–958. Xavier, C. A. (2010). Higher education and the construction of institutional identities in a globalizing world. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, National University of Singapore.