Constructing useful theory: The case of Six Sigma
Tóm tắt
Organizational practices related to Six Sigma are believed to have resulted in improved organizational outcomes. The academic community, however, continues to lack understanding of the constructs and causal relationships underlying Six Sigma. Hence, discussion of Six Sigma is buffeted by anecdotal experience reported from practice. We evaluate Six Sigma through the lens of literature on theory development to explain why the Six Sigma constructs, assumptions, and causal relationships are inconsistent with theory development principles.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ Sci 10:43–68
Amundson SD (1998) Relationships between theory-driven empirical research in operations management and other disciplines. J Oper Manag 16:341–359
Antonakis J, House RJ (2002) An analysis of the full-range leadership theory: the way forward. In: Avolio BJ, Yammarino FJ (eds) Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead. JAI, Amsterdam, pp 3–34
Antonakis J, House RJ (2004) On instrumental leadership: beyond transactions and transformations. Paper presented at the Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska
Antonakis J, Avolio BJ, Sivasubramaniam N (2003) Context and leadership: an examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ Form 5X). Leadership Quart 14:261–295
Antonakis J, Cianciolo AT, Sternberg RJ (2004) The nature of leadership. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Acad Manage Rev 14:496–515
Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectation. The Free Press, New York, NY
Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free. McGraw-Hill, New York
de Treville S, Edelson NM, Watson R (1995) Getting Six Sigma back to basics. Quality Digest 15:42–47
Dubin R (1969) Theory building. The Free Press, New York, NY
Dubin R (1976) Theory building in applied areas. In: Dunette MD (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago
Harry MJ, Lawson JR (1992) Six Sigma producibility analysis and process characterization. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Latzko WJ (1995) Notes on the Six Sigma concept. Available via http://deming.eng.clemson.edu/pub/den/six_sig.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2008
Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Manage J 14:95–112
Lewin K (1945) The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry 8:126–135
Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Zaheer S, Choo AS (2003) Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J Oper Manag 21:193–203
Locke EA, Latham GP (2004) What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Acad Manage Rev 29:388–403
Lowe KB, Gardner WL (2000) Ten years of The Leadership Quarterly: contributions and challenges for the future. Leadership Quart 11:459–514
Meredith J (1993) Theory building through conceptual methods. Int J Oper Prod Man 13(5):3–11
Monden Y (1983) Toyota production system. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA
Motorola (2008) Motorola University Six Sigma Dictionary. Available online via http://www.motorola.com/content.jsp?globalObjectId=3074-5804. Accessed May 26, 2008
Olifant J (2008) Can anyone define what Six Sigma really is? Available online via http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=8741. Accessed May 26, 2008
Osigweh CAB (1989) Concept fallibility in organizational science. Acad Manage Rev 14:579–594
Popper KR (1995/1989) Conjectures and refutations, 5th edn (reprinted). Routledge, London
Pyzdek T (1999) Non-normal distributions in the real world. Available via http://www.qualitydigest.com/dec99/html/nonnormal.html. Accessed January 29, 2005
Schonberger RJ (1982) Japanese manufacturing techniques: nine hidden lessons in simplicity. The Free Press, New York
Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, & Choo AS (2008) Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory. J Oper Manag 26:536–554
Siviy J (2008) Six Sigma. Available online via http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/sigma6_body.html. Accessed May 26, 2008
Tushman M, O’Reilly III, CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manage Rev 3(4):8–30
Van de Ven AH (1989) Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Acad Manage Rev 14:486–489
Vroom VH (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York, NY (republished by Jossey-Bass 1994)
Wacker JG (2004) A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments. J Oper Manag 22:629–650
Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad Manage Rev 14:516–531
Whetten D (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manage Rev 14:490–495