Constructing reality with models

Synthese - Tập 196 - Trang 4605-4622 - 2018
Sim-Hui Tee1
1Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia

Tóm tắt

Scientific models are used to predict and understand the target phenomena in the reality. The kind of epistemic relationship between the model and the reality is always regarded by most of the philosophers as a representational one. I argue that, complementary to this representational role, some of the scientific models have a constructive role to play in altering and reconstructing the reality in a physical way. I hold that the idealized model assumptions and elements bestow the constructive force of a model on the reality. By recognizing the physical constructive force of some scientific models, the merit of these models could be judged by how successful they are in the reality construction, rather than by the traditional criterion of model-world representation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barberousse, A., & Ludwig, P. (2009). Models as fictions. In M. Suárez (Ed.), Fictions in science: Philosophical essays on modeling and idealization (pp. 56–73). New York: Routledge. Beatty, J. (2017). Narrative possibility and narrative explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 62, 31–41. Bokulich, A. (2011). How scientific models can explain. Synthese, 180, 33–45. Boldyrev, I., & Ushakov, A. (2016). Adjusting the model to adjust the world: Constructive mechanisms in postwar general equilibrium theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23(1), 38–56. Bueno, O., & French, S. (2011). How theories represent. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(4), 857–894. Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cartwright, N. (1999). Models and the limits of theory: Quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS models of superconductivity. In M. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 241–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chen, H., Bjerknes, M., Kumar, R., & Jay, E. (1994). Determination of the optimal aligned spacing between the Shine–Dalgarno sequence and the translation initiation codon of Escherichia coli mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(23), 4953–4957. Cheon, D.-J., & Orsulic, S. (2011). Mouse models of cancer. Annual Review of Pathology, 6, 95–119. Craver, C. (2006). When mechanistic models explain. Synthese, 153, 355–376. de Donato Rodríguez, X., & Arroyo-Santos, A. (2012). The structure of idealization in biological theories: The case of the Wright–Fisher model. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 43(1), 11–27. de Donato Rodríguez, X., & Zamora Bonilla, J. (2009). Credibility, idealisation, and model building: An inferential approach. Erkenntnis, 70, 101–118. Francoeur, E. (2001). Molecular models and the articulation of structural constraints in chemistry. In U. Klein (Ed.), Tools and modes of representation in the laboratory sciences (pp. 95–115). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Frigg, R. (2010). Models and fiction. Synthese, 172, 251–268. Giere, R. (1998). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Griesemer, J. R. (1990). Material models in biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 79–93. Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2013). Appraising models nonrepresentationally. Philosophy of Science, 80, 850–861. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hartmann, S. (1999). Models and stories in hadron physics. In M. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 326–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hwang, I. Y., Koh, E., Wong, A., March, J. C., Bentley, W. E., Lee, Y. S., et al. (2017). Engineered probiotic Escherichia coli can eliminate and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa gut infection in animal models. Nature Communications, 8, 15028. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15028. Ibarra, A., & Mormann, T. (2006). Scientific theories as intervening representations. Theoria, 55, 21–38. Knuuttila, T., & Boon, M. (2011). How do models give us knowledge? The case of Carnot’s ideal heat engine. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(3), 309–334. Mäki, U. (2005). Models are experiments, experiments are models. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2), 303–315. Mäki, U. (2009). MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis, 70, 29–43. Merdanovic, M., Clausen, T., Kaiser, M., Huber, R., & Ehrmann, M. (2011). Protein quality control in the bacterial periplasm. Annual Review of Microbiology, 65, 149–168. Mishler, D., Topp, S., Reynoso, C., & Gallivan, J. (2010). Engineering bacteria to recognize and follow small molecules. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21, 653–656. Mishra, B., Reiling, S., Zarena, D., & Wang, G. (2017). Host defense antimicrobial peptides as antibiotics: design and application strategies. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 38, 87–96. Morgan, M. (2001). Models, stories and the economic world. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(3), 361–384. Morgan, M. (2012). The world in the model: How economists work and think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morgan, M. (2017). Narrative ordering and explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 62, 86–97. Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 10–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ochman, H., Lawrence, J., & Groisman, E. (2000). Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature, 405, 299–304. Pero, F., & Suárez, M. (2016). Varieties of misrepresentation and homomorphism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 71–90. Pincock, C. (2012). Mathematics and scientific representation. New York: Oxford University Press. Ramasubbu, N., Thomas, L. M., Ragunath, C., & Kaplan, J. B. (2005). Structural analysis of Dispersin B, a biofilm-releasing glycoside hydrolase from the periodontopathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Journal of Molecular Biology, 349, 475–486. Ratcliff, W., Denison, R., Borrello, M., & Travisano, M. (2012). Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(5), 1595–1600. Rock, J. M., Hopkins, F. F., Chavez, A., Diallo, M., Chase, M. R., Gerrick, E. R., et al. (2017). Programmable transcriptional repression in mycobacteria using an orthogonal CRISPR interference platform. Nature Microbiology, 2, 16274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.274. Rouse, J. (2009). Laboratory fictions. In M. Suárez (Ed.), Fictions in science: Philosophical essays on modeling and idealization (pp. 37–55). New York: Routledge. Stathopoulos, T. (1984). Design and fabrication of a wind tunnel for building aerodynamics. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 16, 361–376. Suárez, M. (2003). Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(3), 225–244. Suarez, M. (2004). An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 767–779. Sugden, R. (2000). Credible worlds: The status of theoretical models in economics. Journal of Economics Methodology, 7(1), 1–31. Sugden, R. (2013). How fictional accounts can explain. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(3), 237–243. Tassoni, R., van der Aart, L. T., Ubbink, M., van Wezel, G. P., & Pannu, N. S. (2017). Structural and functional characterization of the alanine racemase from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 483(1), 122–128. Thomson-Jones, M. (2010). Missing systems and the face value practice. Synthese, 172, 283–299. Toon, A. (2010). Models as make-believe. In R. Frigg & M. C. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond mimesis and convention: Representation in art and science (pp. 71–96). Dordrecht: Springer. Toon, A. (2012). Models as make-believe: Imagination, fiction and scientific representation. New York: Palgrave. Wackett, L. (2011). Engineering microbes to produce biofuels. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 22, 388–393. Weber, M. (2014). Experimental modeling in biology: In vivo representation and stand-ins as modeling strategies. Philosophy of Science, 81(5), 756–769. Weisberg, M. (2007). Three kinds of idealization. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(12), 639–659. Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. New York: Oxford University Press. Winsberg, E. (2006). Models of success versus the success of models: Reliability without truth. Synthese, 152, 1–19. Yu, J. S., & Bagheri, N. (2016). Multi-class and multi-scale models of complex biological phenomena. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 39, 167–173.