Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force

Bridges, 2011, Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force, Value Health, 14, 403, 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013

Johnson, 2008, Survey-design and analytical strategies for better healthcare stated-choice studies, Patient, 1, 299, 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00011

Bridges, 2003, Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics, Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 213

Bridges, 2007, Patient preference methods—a patient centered evaluation paradigm, ISPOR CONNECTIONS, 13, 4

Szeinbach, 2011, Understanding conjoint analysis applications in health, ISPOR CONNECTIONS, 17, 8

Marshall DBJ, Hauber AB, Cameron R, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 2010;3:249–56.

Marshall, 2007, Comparison of physician and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a discrete choice experiment, Value Health, 10, A346, 10.1016/S1098-3015(10)65234-5

Orme, 2010

Ryan, 2003, Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections, Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55

Carlsson, 2003, Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics, Health Econ, 12, 281, 10.1002/hec.729

Louviere, 2009, Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future, Health Econ Policy Law, 4, 527, 10.1017/S1744133109990193

Viney, 2005, Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care, Health Econ, 14, 349, 10.1002/hec.981

Street, 2008, Designing discrete choice experiments for health care

Louviere, 2010, Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis, J Choice Model, 3, 57, 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9

Kuhfeld WF. Experimental design: efficiency, coding, and choice designs. 2010. Available from: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010c.pdf. [Accessed April 25, 2012].

Street, 2007

Lancsar, 2006, Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?, Health Econ, 15, 797, 10.1002/hec.1104

Lancsar, 2008, Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide, Pharmacoeconomics, 26, 661, 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004

Hensher, 2005

Louviere, 2000

Johnson, 2006, Experimental design for stated-choice studies

Kanninen, 2002, Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments, J Mark Res, 39, 214, 10.1509/jmkr.39.2.214.19080

Raghavarao, 2011, Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Finn, 1992, Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety, J Public Policy Mark, 11, 12, 10.1177/074391569201100202

Flynn, 2010, Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 10, 259, 10.1586/erp.10.29

Flynn, 2007, Best-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it, J Health Econ, 26, 171, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002

Louviere, 2010, Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to measure public perceptions and preferences for healthcare reform in Australia, Patient, 3, 275, 10.2165/11539660-000000000-00000

Rose, 2008, Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives, Transp Res Part B Methodol, 42, 395, 10.1016/j.trb.2007.09.002

Bliemer MCJ, Rose JM. Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice studies. 2005. Available from: http://ws.econ.usyd.edu.au/itls/wp-archive/itls_wp_05-08.pdf. [Accessed April 25, 2012].

Bliemer, 2009, Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models, Transp Res Part B Methodol, 43, 19, 10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.008

Maddala, 2003, An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences, Health Econ, 12, 1035, 10.1002/hec.798

Johnson FR, Yang J-C, Mohamed AF. In defense of imperfect experimental designs: statistical efficiency and measurement error in choice-format conjoint analysis. In: Proceedings of 2012 Sawtooth Software Conference. Orlando, FL, March 2012.

Lancsar E. Discrete choice experimental design for alternative specific choice models: an application exploring preferences for drinking water [Invited paper]. Presented at: the Design of Experiments in Healthcare Conference, Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematical Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2011.

Discrete Choice Experiments [computer software]. Sydney: School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, 2007. Available from: http://crsu.science.uts.edu.au/choice. [Accessed April 20, 2012].

Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ. Ngene. Available from: http://www.choice-metrics. com/download.html. [Accessed April 25, 2012].

Sawtooth Software [computer software]. Sequim: Sawtooth Software, 2009.

Gauss [computer software]. Gauss 8.0. Black Diamond: Aptech Systems, Inc., 2011.

Kuhfeld WF. Marketing research methods in SAS. 2010. Available from: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010.pdf. [Accessed April 25, 2012].

Sawtooth Software. On Interaction Effects and CBC Designs. Sequim: Sawtooth Solutions, 1998. Available from: www.sawtoothsoftware.com/education/ss/ss8.shtml. [Accessed April 20, 2012].

Hall, 2001, Using stated preference discrete choice modeling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination, Health Econ, 11, 457, 10.1002/hec.694

Kuhfeld, 1994, Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications, J Mark Res, 31, 545, 10.2307/3151882

Sándor, 2001, Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs, J Mark Res, 38, 430, 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.430.18904

Sándor, 2005, Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs, J Mark Res, 42, 210, 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.210.62285

Bliemer, 2010, Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations, Transp Res Part B Methodol, 44, 720, 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.004

Fowkes, 1988, The design of stated preference travel choice experiments, J Transport Econ Policy, 13, 27

Fowkes, 1993, Non-orthogonal stated preference design, Proceed PTRC Summer Ann Meet, 91

Hahn, 1967

SPSS [computer software]. Chicago: SPSS, 2008.

Sloane NJ. A library of orthogonal arrays. 2003. Available from: http://www2.research.att.com/∼njas/oadir. [Accessed April 25, 2012].

Kuhfeld W.F. Orthogonal arrays. Available from: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/ts723.html. [Accessed April 20, 2012].

Cook, 1980, A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact d-optimal designs, Technometrics, 22, 315, 10.1080/00401706.1980.10486162

Fedorov, 1972

Zwerina K, Huber J, Kuhfeld W. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Available from: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010e.pdf. [Accessed April 25, 2012].

Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ, Stated choice experimental design theory: the who, the what and the why. In: Podium presentation presented at the 3rd Conjoint Analysis in Health Conference. Newport Beach, CA, October 5–8, 2010.

Sándor, 2002, Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models, Mark Sci, 21, 455, 10.1287/mksc.21.4.455.131

Huber, 1996, The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs, J Mark Res, 33, 307, 10.2307/3152127

Kessels, 2009, An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs, J Bus Econ Stat, 27, 279, 10.1198/jbes.2009.0026

Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ, Designing efficient data for stated choice experiments [poster]. Presented at: the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research. Kyoto, Japan, August 16–20, 2006.

Jaeger, 2008, Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: a case study, Food Qual Prefer, 19, 539, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.02.005

Scarpa, 2008, Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why, Aust J Agricult Res Econ, 52, 253, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00436.x

ChoiceMetrics. Ngene 1.1.1 User Manual & Reference Guide, Australia; 2012.