Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire

Scandinavian Journal of Pain - Tập 13 - Trang 148-153 - 2016
Olli Ruokolainen1,2, Marianne Haapea1,2,3, Steven Linton4, Katariina Korniloff5, Arja Häkkinen5,6, Markus Paananen2, Jaro Karppinen1,2,7
1Center for Life Course Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland
2Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
3Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
4Center for Health And Medical Psychology, Department of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
5Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
6Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
7Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland

Tóm tắt

Abstract Introduction Chronic pain causes suffering for affected individuals and incurs costs to society through work disability. Interventions based on early screening of psychological risk factors for chronic pain using screening tools such as the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) have been found to reduce work absenteeism and health care visits and increase perceived health. The aim of the current study was to translate the ÖMPSQ into Finnish and test its validity and reliability in a patient sample. Methods The ÖMPSQ was forward–backward translated and cross-culturally adapted, and applied to our study population (n = 69), the members of which had been referred to the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Oulu University Hospital from primary health care centres in Northern Finland due to chronic low back pain. The patients answered the ÖMPSQ two weeks before the hospital visit, and the follow-up questionnaire either during the hospital visit, or after by mail. The reliability of the ÖMPSQ was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Factor analysis was used to group items of the ÖMPSQ, and internal consistency between the items was determined by calculating Cronbach’s alphas. Results The cross-cultural adaptation revealed only minor semantic and cultural differences. Measurements showed reliability as moderate to nearly perfect for all of the ÖMPSQ items (ICC values ranged from 0.59 to 0.96). Items loaded into five different factors: disability, psychological symptoms, pain, fear avoidance, and work. All except one (work) showed acceptable internal consistency. The ÖMPSQ score was positively associated with both intensity of pain and the Oswestry Disability Index. Conclusions and implications The reliability and construct validity of the Finnish version of the ÖMPSQ were good. The predictive ability of the ÖMPSQ in the Finnish population should be evaluated in further studies.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Groenewald CB, Essner BS, Wright D, Fesinmeyer MD, Palermo TM. The economic costs of chronic pain among a cohort of treatment seeking adolescents in the United States. J Pain 2014;15:925–33. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287–333. Sattelmayer M, Lorenz T, Roder C, Hilfiker R. Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems. Eur Spine J 2012;21: 773–84. Bergbom S, Boersma K, Linton SJ. When matching fails: understanding the process of matching pain-disability treatment to risk profile. J Occup Rehabil 2015;25:518–26. Linton SJ, Boersma K, Traczyk M, Shaw W, Nicholas M. Early workplace communication and problem solving to prevent back disability: results of a randomized controlled trial among high-risk workers and their supervisors. J Occup Rehabil 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9596-z. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ, Decade of the Flags Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (yellow flags) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther 2011;91: 737–53. Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003;19:80–6. Westman A, Linton SJ, Ohrvik J, Wahlen P, Leppert J. Do psychosocial factors predict disability and health at a 3-year follow-up for patients with non-acute musculoskeletal pain? A validation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 2008;12:641–9. Maher CG, Grotle M. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2009;25:666–70. Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 1998;14:209–15. Grotle M, Vollestad NK, Brox JI. Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2006;22:458–67. Nonclercq O, Berquin A. Predicting chronicity in acute back pain: validation of a French translation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012;55:263–78. Law RK, Lee EW, Law SW, Chan BK, Chen PP, Szeto GP. The predictive validity of OMPQ on the rehabilitation outcomes for patients with acute and subacute non-specific LBP in a Chinese population. J Occup Rehabil 2013;23:361–70. Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Spanish version of the screening Orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:157, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0157-5. Fagundes FR, Costa LO, Fuhro FF, Manzoni AC, de Oliveira NT, Cabral CM. Orebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian–Portuguese version. Qual Life Res 2015;24:2777–88. Oncu J, Iliser R, Kuran B. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire among Turkish workers with low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2015;29:135–43. Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T, Pfingsten M, Lindena G, Marnitz U, Pfeifer K, Chenot JF. Construct and predictive validity of the German Orebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 2015;25:325–32. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2940–52, discussion 2952. Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S. Development of a short form of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1891–5. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005;8: 94–104. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Tập 13

148-153

Thông tin tác giả