Consistent scaling of whole-shoot respiration between Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and trees

Journal of Plant Research - Tập 134 - Trang 989-997 - 2021
Mofei Wang1,2, Shigeta Mori1,2, Yoko Kurosawa1,2, Juan Pedro Ferrio3,4, Keiko Yamaji5, Kohei Koyama6
1The United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Iwate University, Morioka, Japan
2Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University, Tsuruoka, Japan
3Aragon Agency for Research and Development (ARAID), Zaragoza, Spain
4Department of Forest Resources, Agrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragon (CITA), Zaragoza, Spain
5Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
6Department of Agro-Environmental Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Japan

Tóm tắt

Both Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and tree forests have a large biomass; they are considered to play an important role in ecosystem carbon budgets. The scaling relationship between individual whole-shoot (i.e., aboveground parts) respiration and whole-shoot mass provides a clue for comparing the carbon budgets of Moso bamboo and tree forests. However, nobody has empirically demonstrated whether there is a difference between these forest types in the whole-shoot scaling relationship. We developed whole-shoot chambers and measured the shoot respiration of 58 individual mature bamboo shoots from the smallest to the largest in a Moso bamboo forest, and then compared them with that of 254 tree shoots previously measured. For 30 bamboo shoots, we measured the respiration rate of leaves, branches, and culms. We found that the scaling exponent of whole-shoot respiration of bamboo fitted by a simple power function on a log–log scale was 0.843 (95 % CI 0.797–0.885), which was consistent with that of trees, 0.826 (95 % CI 0.799–0.851), but higher than 3/4, the value typifying the Kleiber’s rule. The respiration rates of leaves, branches, and culms at the whole-shoot level were proportional to their mass, revealing a constant mean mass-specific respiration of 1.19, 0.224, and 0.0978 µmol CO2 kg− 1 s− 1, respectively. These constant values suggest common traits of organs among physiologically integrated ramets within a genet. Additionally, the larger the shoots, the smaller the allocation of organ mass to the metabolically active leaves, and the larger the allocation to the metabolically inactive culms. Therefore, these shifts in shoot-mass partitioning to leaves and culms caused a negative metabolic scaling of Moso bamboo shoots. The observed convergent metabolic scaling of Moso bamboo and trees may facilitate comparisons of the ecosystem carbon budgets of Moso bamboo and tree forests.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Atkin O (2010) Faculty of 1000 Biology: evaluations for Mori S et al. [Peer commentary on the paper “Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees” by Mori S et al.]. https://f1000.com/prime/2712970 Ballesteros FJ, Martinez VJ, Luque B, Lacasa L, Valor E, Moya A (2018) On the thermodynamic origin of metabolic scaling. Sci Rep 8:1448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19853-6 Banavar JR, Cooke TJ, Rinaldo A, Maritan A (2014) Form, function, and evolution of living organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3332–3337. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401336111 Chen SL, Jiang H, Cai ZJ, Zhou XL, Peng CH (2018) The response of the net primary production of Moso bamboo forest to the On and Off-year management: a case study in Anji County, Zhejiang, China. For Ecol Manage 409:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.force.2017.11.008 Cheng DL, Li T, Zhong QL, Wang GX (2010) Scaling relationship between tree respiration rates and biomass. Bio Lett 6:715–717. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0070 Collalti A, Tjoelker MG, Hoch G, Makela A, Guidolotti G, Heskel M, Petit G, Ryan MG, Battipaglia G, Matteucci G, Prentice IC (2019) Plant respiration: Controlled by photosynthesis or biomass? Glob Chang Biol 26:1739–1753. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14857 Dang QL, Margolis HA, Coyea MR, Mikailou SY, Collatz GJ (1997) Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. Tree Physiol 17:521–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.521 Enquist BJ, Bentley LP (2012) Land plants: New theoretical direction and empirical prospects. In: Sibly RM, Brown JH, Kodric-Brown (eds) Metabolic ecology: a scaling approach. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 164–187 Enquist BJ, Allen AP, Brown JH, Gilloly JF, Kerkhoff AJ, Niklas KJ, Price CA, West GB (2007) Does the exception prove the rule? Nature 445:E9–E10. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05548 Ferrio JP, Kurosawa Y, Wang M, Mori S (2018) Hydraulic constraints to whole-tree water use and respiration in young Cryptomeria trees under competition. Forests 9:449. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080449 Glazier DS (2005) Beyond the ‘3/4-power law’: variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biol Rev 80:611–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006834 Glazier DS (2014) Metabolic scaling in complex living systems. Systems 2:451–540. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems2040451 Glazier DS (2018) Rediscovering and reviving old observations and explanations of metabolic scaling in living systems. Systems 6:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6010004 Glazier DS (2020) Activity alters how temperature influences intraspecific metabolic scaling: testing the metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis. J Comp Physiol B 190:445–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-020-01279-0 Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9 Hoque ATM, Sharma RS, Suwa R, Mori S, Hagihara A (2010) Seasonal variation in the size-dependent respiration of mangrove Kandelia obovata Mar Ecol Prog Ser 404:31–37. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08505 Huang W, Ratkowsky DA, Hui C, Wang P, Su J, Shi P (2019) Leaf fresh weight versus dry weight: Which is better for describing the scaling relationship between leaf biomass and leaf area for broad-leaved plants? Forests 10:256. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030256 Isagi Y, Torii A (1998) Range expansion and its mechanism in a naturalized bamboo species, Phyllostachys pubescens, in Japan. J Sustain For 6:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v06n01_08 Isagi Y, Kawahara T, Kamo K, Ito H (1997) Net production and carbon cycling in a bamboo Phyllostachys pubescens stand. Plant Ecol 130:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711814070 Isagi Y, Oda T, Fukushima K, Lian C, Yokogawa M, Kaneko S (2016) Predominance of a single clone of the most widely distributed bamboo species Phyllostachys edulis in East Asia. J Plant Res 129:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-015-0766-z Ishii S (2009) Comprehensive studies on the prevention of the expansion of bamboo forests. Bull Okayama Prefectural For Exp Station 25:13–32 ((in Japanese)) Iwasawa K, Hirose K (2015) Preventing bamboo grove expansion -Guide for measures against neglected bamboo grove-. Agricultural, Forestry and Fisheries Technology Council Technical Guidance Material. (in Japanese) Kleiber M (1932) Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6:315–353. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315 Kurosawa Y, Mori S, Wang M, Ferrio JP, Yamaji K, Koyama K, Haruma T, Doyama K (2021) Initial burst of root development with decreasing respiratory carbon cost in Fagus crenata Blume seedlings. Plant Species Biol 36:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12305 Lin MY, Hsieh IF, Lin PH, Laplace S, Ohashi M, Chen TH, Kume T (2017) Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests as a significant carbon sink? A case study based on 4-year measurements in central Taiwan. Ecol Res 32:845–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1497-5 Liu F, Liu J, Dong M (2016) Ecological consequences of clonal integration in plants. Front Plant Sci 7:700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00770 Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li BL, Chown SL, Reich PB, Gavrilov VM (2008) Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life’s major domains: evidence for life’s metabolic optimum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16994–16999. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802148105 Mao F, Li P, Zhou G, Du H, Xu X, Shi Y, Mo L, Zhou Y, Tu G (2016) Development of the BIOME-BGC model for the simulation of managed Moso bamboo forest ecosystems. J Environ Manage 172:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.013 Mitchell KA, Bolstad PV, Vose JM (1999) Interspecific and environmentally induced variation in foliar dark respiration among eighteen southeastern deciduous tree species. Tree Physiol 19:861–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.13.861 Mori S, Hagihara A (1988) Respiration in stems of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) trees. J Jpn For Soc 70:481–487. https://doi.org/10.11519/jjfs1953.70.11_481 Mori S, Hagihara A (1995) Branch respiration in hinoki [Chamaecyparis obtusa (Sieb. et Zucc.) Endl.] trees, with reference to branch positions within tree crowns. Bull Nagoya Univ For 14:25–34. https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/7034#.YMBXqPkzY2w Mori S, Yamaji A, Ishida K et al (2010) Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902554107 Niklas KJ, Hammond ST (2014) Assessing scaling relationships: uses, abuses, and alternatives. Int J Plant Sci 175:754–763. https://doi.org/10.1086/677238 Oikawa S, Itazawa Y (2003) Relationship between summated tissue respiration and body size in a marine teleost, the porgy Pagrus major. Fish Sci 69:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00675.x O’Leary BM, Asao S, Millar AH, Atkin OK (2019) Core principles which explain variation in respiration across biological scales. New Phytol 222:670–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15576 Peng Y, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Sun S (2010) Ontogenetic shift in the scaling of dark respiration with whole-plant mass in seven shrub species. Funct Ecol 24:502–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01667.x Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Vose JM, Volin JC, Gresham C, Bowman WD (1998) Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia 114:471–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050471 Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Machado JL, Oleksyn J (2006) Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants. Nature 439:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04282 Roiloa SR, Alpert P, Tharayil N, Hancock G, Bhowmik PC (2007) Greater capacity for division of labour in clones of Fragaria chiloensis from patchier habitats. J Ecol 95:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01216.x Saitoh T, Seiwa K, Nishiwaki A (2002) Importance of physiological integration of dwarf bamboo to persistence in forest understorey: a field experiment. J Ecol 90:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00631.x Salomón RL, De Roo L, Oleksyn J, De Pauw DJW, Steppe K (2020) TReSpire – a biophysical tree stem respiration model. New Phytol 225:2214–2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16174 Scurlock JMO, Dayton DC, Hames B (2000) Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource? Biomass Bioenerg 19:229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00038-6 Sibly RM, Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (2012) Metabolic ecology: a scaling approach. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester Song X, Zhou G, Jiang H, Yu S, Fu J, Li W, Wang W, Ma Z, Peng C (2011) Carbon sequestration by Chinese bamboo forests and their ecological benefits: assessment of potential, problems, and future challenges. Environ Rev 19:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-015 Song X, Peng C, Zhou G, Gu H, Li Q, Zhang C (2016) Dynamic allocation and transfer of non-structural carbohydrates, a possible mechanism for the explosive growth of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Sci Rep 6:25908. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25908 Stuefer JF, de Kroon H, During HJ (1996) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. Funct Ecol 10:328–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390280 Takano KT, Hibino K, Numata A, Oguro M, Aiba M, Shiogama H, Takayabu I, Nakashizuka T (2017) Detecting latitudinal and altitudinal expansion of invasive bamboo Phyllostachys edulis and Phyllostachys bambusoides (Poaceae) in Japan to project potential habitats under 1.5–4.0 ℃ global warming. Ecol Evol 7:9848–9859. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3471 Thakur D, Rathore N, Chawla A (2018) Increase in light interception cost and metabolic mass component of leaves are coupled for efficient resource use in the high altitude vegetation. Oikos 128:254–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05538 Tomimatsu H, Matsuo A, Kaneko Y, Kudo E, Taniguchi R, Saitoh T, Suyama Y, Makita A (2020) Spatial genet dynamics of a dwarf bamboo: clonal expansion into shaded forest understory contributes to regeneration after an episodic die-off. Plant Species Biol 2020:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12272 Torii A (2018) Points to exterminate bamboo. Kansai Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Research Information No.127 (in Japanese) Wen G, Zhang L, Zhang L, Cao Z, Zhou G, Huang G, Wong G (2011) Temporal and spatial dynamics of carbon fixation by Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) in Subtropical China. Bot Rev 77:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-011-9068-x West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997) A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.122 West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:664–667. https://doi.org/10.1038/23251 Yagi M, Kanda T, Takeda T, Ishimatsu A, Oikawa S (2010) Ontogenetic phase shifts in metabolism: links to development and anti-predator adaptation. Proc Royal Soc B 277:2793–2801. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0583 Yuen JQ, Fung T, Zeigler AD (2017) Carbon stocks in bamboo ecosystems worldwide: estimates and uncertainties. For Ecol Manag 393:113–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.017 Zhou BZ, Fu MY, Xie JZ, Yang XS, Li ZC (2005) Ecological functions of bamboo forest: research and application. J For Res 16:143–147 Zhou G, Meng C, Jiang P, Xu Q (2011) Review of fixation in bamboo forests in China. Bot Rev 77:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-011-9082-z