Considerations for Exchanging and Sharing Medical Images for Improved Collaboration and Patient Care: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper

Journal of Digital Imaging - Tập 29 - Trang 547-558 - 2016
Amy Vreeland1, Kenneth R. Persons2, Henri (Rik) Primo3, Matthew Bishop4, Kimberley M. Garriott5, Matthew K. Doyle6, Elliott Silver7, Danielle M. Brown8, Chris Bashall9
1Imaging Strategies, Waban, USA
2Mayo Clinic IT, Rochester, USA
3Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Digital Health Services, Malvern, USA
4UnityPoint Health IT, Bettendorf, USA
5Logicalis, Inc, Healthcare Strategies Division, Indianapolis, USA
6Epic, Verona, USA
7McKesson Imaging and Workflow Solutions Division, King of Prussia, USA
8Aspirus IT, Wausau, USA
9Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Radiology Dept, Nedlands, Australia

Tóm tắt

The need for providers and patients to exchange and share imaging has never been more apparent, yet many organizations are only now, as a part of a larger enterprise imaging initiative, taking steps to streamline an important process that has historically been facilitated with the use of CDs or insecure methods of communication. This paper will provide an introduction to concepts and common-use cases for image exchange, outline challenges that have hindered adoption to date, and describe standards for image exchange that show increasing promise of being adopted by vendors and providers.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Howell W, “Imaging Utilization Trends and Reimbursement” Diagnostic Imaging. 2014; Available at: http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/reimbursement/imaging-utilization-trends-and reimbursement#sthash.oda3dLMK.dpuf. Accessed May 16, 2016. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Rittenberg E, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N, Menkin V, Winkelman JW, Tanasijevic MJ: What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant? Am J Med 104(4):361–8, 1998. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00063-1 Vest JP, Kaushal R, Hentel K, Kern LM. Health Information Exchange and the Frequency of Repeat Medical Imaging. National Center for Biotechnology Information 2014. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25811815. Accessed April 15, 2016. Emick DM, Carey TS, Charles AG, Shapiro ML: Repeat imaging in trauma transfers. The Journal of Trauma Injury Infection and Critical Care 72(5):1255–1262, 2012. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e3182452b6f Hiremath A, Awan O, Mendelson D, Siegel EL: Patient Perceptions of Participating in the RSNA Image Share Project: a Preliminary Study. Journal of Digital Imaging J Digit Imaging 29(2):189–194, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10278-015-9832-2 Roth CJ, Lannum LM, Persons KR. Foundation of Enterprise Imaging. J Digit Imag, in press. Morin RL: Outside Images on CD: A Management Nightmare. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2(11):958, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2005.08.006 Shrestha RB: Enterprise imaging: Enabling true image exchange. App Rad 5:20–21, 2013 Mendelson DS, Erickson BJ, Choy G: Image Sharing: Evolving Solutions in the Age of Interoperability. Journal of the American College of Radiology 11(12):1260–1269, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.013 Chwals WJ, Robinson AV, Sivit CJ, Alaedeen D, Fitzenrider E, Cizmar L: Computed tomography before transfer to a level I pediatric trauma center risks duplication with associated increased radiation exposure. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 43(12):2268–2272, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.061 Moya M, Valdez J, Yonas H, Alverson DC: The Impact of a Telehealth Web-Based Solution on Neurosurgery Triage and Consultation. Telemedicine and E-Health 16(9):945–949, 2010. doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0044 Psoter KJ, Roudsari BS, Vaughn M, Fine GC, Jarvik JG, Gunn ML: Effect of an Image-Sharing Network on CT Utilization for Transferred Trauma Patients: A 5-Year Experience at a Level I Trauma Center. Journal of the American College of Radiology 11(6):616–622, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.02.014 Dinesen B, Nonnecke B, Lindeman D, Toft E, Kidholm K, Jethwani K, Young HM, Spindler H, Oestergaard CU, Southard JA, Gutierrez M, Anderson N, Albert NM, Han JJ, Nesbitt T. Personalized Telehealth in the Future: A Global Research Agenda. J Med Internet Res 2016;18(3):e53. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2016/3/e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5257. PMCID: 4795318 Roth CJ, Lannum LM, Joseph CL. Enterprise Imaging Governance: Needs, Models, and Intents To Consider. J Digit Imag, in press. Connecting Health and Care for the Nation. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/nationwide-interoperability-roadmap-draft-version-1.0.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2016 Interoperability Pledge. https://www.healthit.gov/commitment. Accessed May 16, 2016 AHIMA. “Retention and Destruction of Health Information. Appendix C: AHIMA’s Recommended Retention Standards.” http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_049250.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_049250. Accessed 4/13/2016. Mcneeley MF, Gunn ML, Robinson JD: Transfer Patient Imaging: Current Status, Review of the Literature, and the Harborview Experience. Journal of the American College of Radiology 10(5):361–367, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.031 Eakins C, Ellis WD, Pruthi S, Johnson DP, Hernanz-Schulman M, Yu C, Kan JH: Second Opinion Interpretations by Specialty Radiologists at a Pediatric Hospital: Rate of Disagreement and Clinical Implications. American Journal of Roentgenology 199(4):916–920, 2012. doi:10.2214/ajr.11.7662 Lindgren, E. A., Patel, M. D., Wu, Q., Melikian, J., & Hara, A. K. (2014). The clinical impact of subspecialized radiologist reinterpretation of abdominal imaging studies, with analysis of the types and relative frequency of interpretation discrepancies. Abdom Imaging Abdominal Imaging, 39(5), 1119-1126. doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0140-y Zan E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS: Second-Opinion Consultations in Neuroradiology 1. Radiology 255(1):135–141, 2010. doi:10.1148/radiol.09090831