Consequences of ignoring variable and spatially autocorrelated detection probability in spatial capture-recapture
Tóm tắt
Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are increasingly popular for analyzing wildlife monitoring data. SCR can account for spatial heterogeneity in detection that arises from individual space use (detection kernel), variation in the sampling process, and the distribution of individuals (density). However, unexplained and unmodeled spatial heterogeneity in detectability may remain due to cryptic factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the study system. This is the case, for example, when covariates coding for variable effort and detection probability in general are incomplete or entirely lacking. We identify how the magnitude and configuration of unmodeled, spatially variable detection probability influence SCR parameter estimates. We simulated SCR data with spatially variable and autocorrelated detection probability. We then fitted an SCR model ignoring this variation to the simulated data and assessed the impact of model misspecification on inferences. Highly-autocorrelated spatial heterogeneity in detection probability (Moran’s I = 0.85–0.96), modulated by the magnitude of the unmodeled heterogeneity, can lead to pronounced negative bias (up to 65%, or about 44-fold decrease compared to the reference scenario), reduction in precision (249% or 2.5-fold) and coverage probability of the 95% credible intervals associated with abundance estimates to 0. Conversely, at low levels of spatial autocorrelation (median Moran’s I = 0), even severe unmodeled heterogeneity in detection probability did not lead to pronounced bias and only caused slight reductions in precision and coverage of abundance estimates. Unknown and unmodeled variation in detection probability is liable to be the norm, rather than the exception, in SCR studies. We encourage practitioners to consider the impact that spatial autocorrelation in detectability has on their inferences and urge the development of SCR methods that can take structured, unknown or partially unknown spatial variability in detection probability into account.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Altwegg R, Nichols JD (2019) Occupancy models for citizen-science data. Methods Ecol Evol 10(1):8–21
Beng KC, Corlett RT (2020) Applications of environmental dna (edna) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodivers Conserv 29(7):2089–2121
Bird TJ, Bates AE, Lefcheck JS, Hill NA, Thomson RJ, Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Wotherspoon S, Krkosek M, Stuart-Smith JF (2014) Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biol Conserv 173:144–154
Bischof R, Brøseth H, Gimenez O (2016) Wildlife in a politically divided world: insularism inflates estimates of brown bear abundance. Conserv Lett 9(2):122–130
Bischof R, Steyaert SM, Kindberg J (2017) Caught in the mesh: roads and their network-scale impediment to animal movement. Ecography 40(12):1369–1380
Bischof R, Milleret C, Dupont P, Chipperfield J, Tourani M, Ordiz A, de Valpine P, Turek D, Royle JA, Gimenez O, Flagstad Ø, Åkesson M, Svensson L, Brøseth H, Kindberg J (2020a) Estimating and forecasting spatial population dynamics of apex predators using transnational genetic monitoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(48):30531–30538
Bischof R, Turek D, Milleret C, Ergon T, Dupont P, de Valpine, P (2020b) nimbleSCR: Spatial Capture-Recapture (SCR) methods using ‘nimble’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nimbleSCR/index.html
Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64(2):377–385
Borchers DL, Laake JL, Southwell C, Paxton CG (2006) Accommodating unmodeled heterogeneity in double-observer distance sampling surveys. Biometrics 62(2):372–378
Brooks SP, Gelman A (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 7(4):434–455
Burton AC, Neilson E, Moreira D, Ladle A, Steenweg R, Fisher JT, Bayne E, Boutin S (2015) Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J Appl Ecol 52(3):675–685
Chandler R, Hepinstall-Cymerman J (2016) Estimating the spatial scales of landscape effects on abundance. Landsc Ecol 31(6):1383–1394
Chao A (2001) An overview of closed capture-recapture models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 6(2):158–175
Chen W, Ficetola GF (2019) Conditionally autoregressive models improve occupancy analyses of autocorrelated data: an example with environmental DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 19(1):163–175
Clark JD (2019) Comparing clustered sampling designs for spatially explicit estimation of population density. Popul Ecol 61(1):93–101
Conn PB, Thorson JT, Johnson DS (2017) Confronting preferential sampling when analysing population distributions: diagnosis and model-based triage. Methods Ecol Evol 8(11):1535–1546
Conn PB, Johnson DS, Williams PJ, Melin SR, Hooten MB (2018) A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists. Ecol Monogr 88(4):526–542
de Valpine P, Turek D, Paciorek CJ, Anderson-Bergman C, Lang DT, Bodik R (2017) Programming with models: writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with NIMBLE. J Comput Graph Stat 26(2):403–413
Efford M (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106(3):598–610
Efford MG (2011) Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. Ecology 92(12):2202–2207
Efford MG, Fewster RM (2013) Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture-recapture. Oikos 122(6):918–928
Efford MG, Mowat G (2014) Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture-recapture data. Ecology 95(5):1341–1348
Efford MG, Borchers DL, Mowat G (2013) Varying effort in capture-recapture studies. Methods Ecol Evol 4(7):629–636
Efford M, Dawson DK, Jhala Y, Qureshi Q (2016) Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture-recapture. Ecography 39(7):676–688
Gaspard G, Kim D, Chun Y (2019) Residual spatial autocorrelation in macroecological and biogeographical modeling: a review. J Ecol Environ 43(1):1–11
Gelman A, Meng X-L, Stern H (1996) Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat Sin 6(4):733–760
Gerber BD, Parmenter RR (2015) Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities. Ecol Appl 25(3):695–705
Gimenez O, Viallefont A, Charmantier A, Pradel R, Cam E, Brown CR, Anderson MD, Brown MB, Covas R, Gaillard J-M (2008) The risk of flawed inference in evolutionary studies when detectability is less than one. Am Nat 172(3):441–448
Gimenez O, Cam E, Gaillard J-M (2018a) Individual heterogeneity and capture-recapture models: what, why and how? Oikos 127(5):664–686
Gimenez O, Lebreton JD, Choquet R, Pradel R (2018b) R2ucare: an R package to perform goodness-of-fit tests for capture-recapture models. Methods Ecol Evol 9(7):1749–1754
Guélat J (2013) Spatial autocorrelation (introduction). https://rpubs.com/jguelat/autocorr
Guélat J, Kéry M (2018) Effects of spatial autocorrelation and imperfect detection on species distribution models. Methods Ecol Evol 9(6):1614–1625
Hijmans RJ (2019) raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster
Howe EJ, Obbard ME, Kyle CJ (2013) Combining data from 43 standardized surveys to estimate densities of female American black bears by spatially explicit capture-recapture. Popul Ecol 55(4):595–607
Johnson DS, Conn PB, Hooten MB, Ray JC, Pond BA (2013) Spatial occupancy models for large data sets. Ecology 94(4):801–808
Kellner KF, Swihart RK (2014) Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review. PLoS ONE 9:e111436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111436
Kendall KC, Graves TA, Royle JA, Macleod AC, McKelvey KS, Boulanger J, Waller JS (2019) Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population. Sci Rep 9(1):1–11
Kristensen TV, Kovach AI (2018) Spatially explicit abundance estimation of a rare habitat specialist: implications for SECR study design. Ecosphere 9(5):e02217
Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72(3):445–463
Link WA (2003) Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities. Biometrics 59(4):1123–1130
Lukacs PM, Burnham KP (2005) Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling. Mol Ecol 14(13):3909–3919
Marques TA, Thoma L, Royle JA (2011) A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data: comment. Ecology 92(2):526–528
Milleret C, Dupont P, Brøseth H, Kindberg J, Royle JA, Bischof R (2018) Using partial aggregation in spatial capture recapture. Methods Ecol Evol 9(8):1896–1907
Milleret C, Dupont P, Akesson M, Svensson L, Brøseth H, Bischof R (2020) Consequences of reduced sampling intensity for estimating population size of wolves in Scandinavia with spatial capture-recapture models. Technical report. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2650153
Moran P (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1):17–23
Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21(12):668–673
Nicolau PG, Sørbye SH, Yoccoz NG (2020) Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data. Ecol Evol 10(23):12710–12726
Paterson JT, Proffitt K, Jimenez B, Rotella J, Garrott R (2019) Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: a case study using mountain lions. PLoS ONE 14(4):1–20
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Royle JA (2006) Site occupancy models with heterogeneous detection probabilities. Biometrics 62(1):97–102
Royle JA, Young KV (2008) A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. Ecology 89(8):2281–2289
Royle JA, Dorazio RM, Link WA (2007) Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. J Comput Graph Stat 16(1):67–85
Royle JA, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, Gopalaswamy AM (2009) A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera-trap studies. J Appl Ecol 46(1):118–127
Royle JA, Chandler RB, Gazenski KD, Graves TA (2013) Spatial capture-recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity. Ecology 94(2):287–294
Royle JA, Chandler RB, Sollmann R, Gardner B (2014) Spatial capture-recapture. Academic Press, Waltham
Royle JA, Fuller AK, Sutherland C (2018) Unifying population and landscape ecology with spatial capture-recapture. Ecography 41(3):444–456
Sicacha-Parada J, Steinsland I, Cretois B, Borgelt J (2021) Accounting for spatial varying sampling effort due to accessibility in citizen science data: a case study of moose in Norway. Spat Stat 42:100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100446
Sokal RR, Oden NL (1978) Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biol J Linn Soc 10(2):199–228
Sollmann R, Gardner B, Belant JL (2012) How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models? PLoS ONE 7(4):1–8
Steenweg R, Hebblewhite M, Whittington J, Lukacs P, McKelvey K (2018) Sampling scales define occupancy and underlying occupancy-abundance relationships in animals. Ecology 99(1):172–183
Stevenson BC, Fewster RM, Sharma K (2021) Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture–recapture models. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13502
Sun CC, Royle JA, Fuller AK (2019) Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models. Ecology 100(9):1–12
Tenan S, Pedrini P, Bragalanti N, Groff C, Sutherland C (2017) Data integration for inference about spatial processes: a model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0185588
Thompson CM, Royle JA, Garner JD (2012) A framework for inference about carnivore density from unstructured spatial sampling of scat using detector dogs. J Wildl Manag 76(4):863–871
Tourani M, Brøste EN, Bakken S, Odden J, Bischof R (2020a) Sooner, closer, or longer: detectability of mesocarnivores at camera traps. J Zool 312:259–270
Tourani M, Dupont P, Nawaz MA, Bischof R (2020b) Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: how much do we gain? Ecology 101(7):1–8
Turek D, Milleret C, Ergon T, Brøseth H, Dupont P, Bischof R, de Valpine P (2021) Efficient estimation of large-scale spatial capture-recapture models. Ecosphere 12(2):e03385
Walther BA, Moore JL (2005) The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28(6):815–829