Connective capacity in water governance practices: The meaning of trust and boundary spanning for integrated performance

Schneider, 2003, Building consensual institutions: networks and the National Estuary Program, Am J Polit Sci, 47, 143, 10.1111/1540-5907.00010 Tropp, 2007, Water governance: trends and needs for new capacity development, Water Policy, 9, 19, 10.2166/wp.2007.137 Tortajada, 2010, Water governance: a research agenda, Int J Water Resour Dev, 26, 309, 10.1080/07900621003683322 Heikkila, 2011, The role of cross-scale institutional linkages in common pool resource management: assessing interstate river compacts, Policy Stud J, 39, 121, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00399.x 2013 Lubell, 2011, Integrated regional water management: a study of collaboration or water politics-as-usual in California, USA, Int Rev Admin Sci, 77, 76, 10.1177/0020852310388367 Lubell, 2012, Testing policy theory with statistical models of networks, Policy Stud J, 40, 351, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x Heikkila, 2004, Institutional boundaries and common-pool resource management: a comparative analysis of water management programs in California, J Policy Anal Manage, 23, 97, 10.1002/pam.10181 Lubell, 2013, Integrated Water Resources Management: a comparative laboratory for water governance, Int J Water Gov, 1, 177, 10.7564/13-IJWG14 Keskitalo, 2013, Connecting multiple levels of governance for adaptation to climate change in advances industrial states, 69 Edelenbos, 2011, Symposium on water governance. Prologue: water governance as a government's actions between the reality of fragmentation and the need for integration, Int Rev Admin Sci, 77, 5, 10.1177/0020852310390090 Van Buuren, 2012, Democratic legitimacy and new forms of water management, Int J Water Resour Dev, 28, 629, 10.1080/07900627.2011.627756 Edelenbos, 2013, Conclusion: towards a synchronization perspective of connective capacity in water governance, 333 Huntjens, 2011, Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate. A formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Asia, and Africa, EPG, 21, 145, 10.1002/eet.571 Layzer, 2013, IWRM in the United States: integration in the Chesapeake Bay program, Int J Water Gov, 1, 237, 10.7564/13-IJWG11 Edelenbos, 2013, Water governance capacity: the art of dealing with a multiplicity of levels, sectors, and domains, Int J Water Gov, 1, 89, 10.7564/12-IJWG5 Marshall, 2013, Australia's Murray-Darling Basin: a century of polycentric experiments in cross-border integration of water resources management, Int J Water Gov, 1, 197, 10.7564/13-IJWG17 Plummer, 2012, Adaptive co-management: a systematic review and analysis, Ecol Soc, 17, 11, 10.5751/ES-04952-170311 Huitema, 2009, Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda, Ecol Soc, 14, 1, 10.5751/ES-02827-140126 Giebels, 2013, Ecosystem-based management in the Wadden Sea: principles for the governance of knowledge, J Sea Res, 82, 176, 10.1016/j.seares.2012.11.002 Edelenbos, 2011, Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects, Environ Sci Policy, 14, 675, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004 Dewulf, 2013, Bridging knowledge frames and networks in climate and water governance, 229 Scholz, 2005 Medema, 2008, From premise to practice: a critical assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector, Ecol Soc, 13, 29, 10.5751/ES-02611-130229 Schie, 2011, Co-valuation: exploring methods for expert and stakeholder valuation, J Environ Assess Policy Manage, 13, 619, 10.1142/S1464333211004036 Teisman, 2011, Towards a perspective of system synchronization in water governance: a synthesis of empirical lessons and complexity theories, Int Rev Admin Sci, 77, 101, 10.1177/0020852310390121 Edelenbos, 2013, Connective capacities of network managers: a comparative study of management styles in eight regional governance networks, Public Manage Rev, 15, 131, 10.1080/14719037.2012.691009 OECD, 2011, 10.1787/9789264114470-en OECD, 2014 Klijn, 2010, The impact of network management strategies on the outcomes in governance networks, Public Admin, 88, 1063, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x Klijn, 2010, Trust in governance networks; its impact and outcomes, Admin Soc, 42, 193, 10.1177/0095399710362716 van Meerkerk, 2014, The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: findings from survey research on urban development projects in the Netherlands, Policy Sci, 47, 3, 10.1007/s11077-013-9181-2 Edelenbos, 2007, Trust in complex decision-making networks: a theoretical and empirical exploration, Admin Soc, 39, 25, 10.1177/0095399706294460 Folke, 2005, Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems, Annu Rev Environ Resour, 30, 441, 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 Edelenbos, 2013, Creating legitimacy in water governance networks through complexity sensitive management, 267 Williams, 2002, The competent boundary spanner, Public Admin, 80, 103, 10.1111/1467-9299.00296 Berardo, 2010, Self-organizing policy networks: risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries, Am J Polit Sci, 54, 632, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x Meerkerk, 2014, Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in The Netherlands, Environ Plan C: Gov Policy Levina, 2005, The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems, MIS Q, 29, 335, 10.2307/25148682 Berardo, 2009, Processing complexity in networks: a study of informal collaboration and its effect on organizational success, Policy Stud J, 37, 521, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00326.x Perrone, 2003, Free to be trusted? Organizational constraints on trust in boundary spanners, Organ Sci, 14, 422, 10.1287/orsc.14.4.422.17487 Stevenson, 2000, Agency and social networks: strategies of action is a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity, Adm Sci Q, 45, 651, 10.2307/2667015