Connecting ‘relational values’ and relational landscape approaches

Raworth, 2012

Hägerstrand, 2001, A look at the political geography of environmental management, 35

Mitchell, 2017, A relational approach to landscape and urbanism: the view from an exclusive suburb, Landsc Res, 42, 277, 10.1080/01426397.2016.1267129

West, 2018, Stewardship, care and relational values, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 35, 30, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.008

Donati, 2011

Klain, 2017, Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm, PLoS One, 12, e0183962, 10.1371/journal.pone.0183962

Chan, 2016, Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment, PNAS, 113, 1462, 10.1073/pnas.1525002113

Diaz, 2018, Assessing nature’s contributions to people, Science, 359, 270, 10.1126/science.aap8826

European Science Foundation, 2010, Landscape in a changing world. Bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society, Sci Policy Brief, 41

Setten, 2013, Landscape and social justice, 243

Brown, 2005, Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications, Soc Nat Resour, 18, 1

Kaltenborn, 2002, Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences, Landsc Urban Plann, 59, 1, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00243-2

Olsson, 2015, Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience, Sci Adv, 1, e1400217, 10.1126/sciadv.1400217

Pascual, 2017, Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 26, 7, 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006

Head, 2017, Holding on and letting go: nature, temporality and environmental management, 3

Peterson, 2018, Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “nature's contributions to people” and “ecosystem services”, Ecol Soc, 23, 39, 10.5751/ES-10134-230139

Pollini, 2016, Construction of nature

Head, 2007, Cultural ecology: the problematic human and the terms of engagement, Prog Hum Geogr, 31, 837, 10.1177/0309132507080625

Fischer, 2016, Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions: an analytical framework, Land Use Policy, 52, 41, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004

Díaz, 2015, The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 14, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

Bridgewater, 2018, IPBES-6: the best plenary yet?, Biodivers Conserv, 27, 2777, 10.1007/s10531-018-1569-z

Wylie, 2007

Ingold, 2011

Setten, 2006, Fusion or exclusion? Reflections of the conceptual practices of landscape and place in human geography, Nor J Geogr, 60, 32, 10.1080/00291950500537315

Hernandez-Morcillo, 2017, Priority questions for the science, policy and practice of cultural landscapes in Europe, Landsc Ecol, 32, 2083, 10.1007/s10980-017-0524-9

Jones, 2011, Introduction: the issue of public participation in the European landscape convention, 1

Raymond, 2013, Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships, BioScience, 63, 536, 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7

Raymond, 2017, An embodied perspective on the co-production of ecosystem services, J Environ Plann Manage, 61, 778, 10.1080/09640568.2017.1312300

Jones, 1991, The elusive reality of landscape. Concepts and approaches in landscape research, Nor J Geogr, 45, 229, 10.1080/00291959108552277

Sui, 2012, Looking through Hägerstrand’s dual vistas: towards a unified framework for time geography, J Transp Geogr, 23, 5, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.020

Setten, 2018, Ecosystem services as an integrative framework: what is the potential?, Land Use Policy, 75, 549, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.023

Setten, 2012, Ecosystem services and landscape management: three challenges and one plea, Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage, 8, 305, 10.1080/21513732.2012.722127

Pascual, 2017, Off-stage ecosystem service burdens: a blind spot for global sustainability, Environ Res Lett, 12, 075001, 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7392

Norgaard, 1994

Stenseke, 2016, Integrated landscape management and the complicating issue of temporality, Landsc Res, 41, 199, 10.1080/01426397.2015.1135316

Manning, 2011

2016, This is the latest comprehensive volume on the European Landscape. The European Landscape Convention has been somewhat influential in scientific research as well as in policy implementation of public participation in landscape management and planning.

Sandell, 2016, Ecostrategies: presentation and elaboration of a conceptual framework of landscape perspectives, Tourism, 64, 63

2011

Head, 2012, Conceptualising the human in cultural landscapes and resilience thinking, 65

Beery, 2014, People in nature: relational discourse for outdoor educators, Res Outdoor Educ, 12, 1, 10.1353/roe.2014.0001

Vik, 2017, Self-mobilisation and lived landscape democracy: local initiatives as democratic landscape practices, Landsc Res, 42, 400, 10.1080/01426397.2017.1290223

Olwig, 2007, The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: the case of the European landscape convention, Landsc Res, 32, 579, 10.1080/01426390701552738

Daugstad, 2006, A case of conflicts in conservation: two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity?, Landsc Res, 31, 1, 10.1080/01426390500448450

Giddens, 1991

Plieninger, 2006, Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes, Environ Sci Policy, 9, 317, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.03.001

Selman, 2012

Hartig, 2016, Living in cities, naturally, Science, 352, 938, 10.1126/science.aaf3759

Jax, 2018, Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 35, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009

Balvanera, 2017, Interconnected place-based social–ecological research can inform global sustainability, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 29, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.005