Conjectural speech acts in Cuzco Quechua

Alonso-Ovalle, 2013, Two views on epistemic indefinites, Lang. Linguist. Compass, 7, 105, 10.1111/lnc3.12009 Alston, 2000 AnderBois, 2014, On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials, vol. 24, 234 AnderBois, 2015, At-issue proposals and appositive impositions in discourse, J. Semant., 32, 93, 10.1093/jos/fft014 Bhadra, 2017, Evidentiality and questions: Bangla at the inferfaces. Bhadra, 2018, Evidentials are syntax-sensitive: the view from Bangla, Glossa: J. Gen. Linguist., 3, 10.5334/gjgl.449 Bhadra, 2020, The semantics of evidentials in questions, J. Semant., 37, 367, 10.1093/jos/ffaa003 Brandom, 1994 Cull, 2019, When Alston met Brandom: defining assertion, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 13, 36 Cusihuaman, 2001 Davis, 2007, The pragmatic values of evidential sentences, Proc. Semant. Linguist. Theory (SALT), 17, pp. 71, 10.3765/salt.v17i0.2966 Deal, 2011, Modals without scales, Language, 87, 559, 10.1353/lan.2011.0060 Chiappe Tafur, 2003 2022 Eckardt, 2020, Conjectural questions: the case of German verb-final wohl questions, Semant. Pragmat., 13, 1, 10.3765/sp.13.9 Eckardt, 2019, Evidentials and questions, 121 Escandell-Vidal, 2014, Evidential futures: the case of Spanish Espinoza, 1997 Faller, 2002 Faller, 2007, The Cuzco Quechua conjectural: an illocutionary analysis of an epistemic evidential Faller, 2011, A possible worlds semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials, vol 20, 660 Faller, 2019, The discourse commitments of illocutionary reportatives, Semant. Pragmat., 12, 1, 10.3765/sp.12.8 Faller, 2019, A non-veridical indefinite in Cuzco Quechua Faller, 2020, The many functions of Cuzco Quechua =pas: implications for the semantic map of additivity, Glossa J. Gen. Linguist., 5 Farkas, 2010, On reacting to assertions and polar questions, J. Semant., 27, 81, 10.1093/jos/ffp010 Farkas, 2022, Non-intrusive questions as a special type of non-canonical questions, J. Semant., 39, 295, 10.1093/jos/ffac001 Farkas, 2015, Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions, Language, 91, 359, 10.1353/lan.2015.0017 Farkas, 2017, Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives, J. Semant., 34, 237 Floyd, 1999 Garrett, 2000 Gauker, 1998, What is a context of utterance?, Phil. Stud. Int. J. Philos. Analyt. Tradit., 91, 149 Geurts, 2019, Communication as commitment sharing: speech acts, implicatures, common ground, Theor. Ling., 45, 1, 10.1515/tl-2019-0001 Grice, 1989 Grunow-Hårsta, 2003, Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar Gunlogson, 2008, A question of commitment, Belg. J. Linguist., 22, 101, 10.1075/bjl.22.06gun Gutzmann, 2013 Gutzmann, 2015 Hamblin, 1971, Mathematical models of dialogue, Theoria, 37, 130, 10.1111/j.1755-2567.1971.tb00065.x Hamblin, 1973, Questions in Montague English, Found. Lang., 10, 41 Izvorski, 1997, The present perfect as an epistemic modal Jeong, 2018, Intonation and sentence type conventions: two types of rising declaratives, J. Semant., 35, 305, 10.1093/semant/ffy001 Karttunen, 1977, Syntax and semantics of questions, Ling. Philos., 1, 3, 10.1007/BF00351935 Koev, 2018, Notions of at-issueness, Lang. Linguist. Compass, 12, 10.1111/lnc3.12306 Koev, 2021, Parentheticality, assertion strength, and polarity, Ling. Philos., 44, 113, 10.1007/s10988-019-09285-4 Korotkova, 2016 Korotkova, 2020, Evidential meaning and (not-)at-issueness, Semant. Pragmat., 13, 1, 10.3765/sp.13.4 Kratzer, 2002, Indeterminate phrases: the view from Japanese Krifka, 2014, Embedding illocutionary acts, vol. 43 Lim, 2015, Evidentials in interrogatives: a case study of Korean, Proc. Sinn und Bedeutung, 15, pp. 419 Littell, 2010, On the semantics of conjectural questions, 89 Malamud, 2015, Three ways to avoid commitments: declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard, J. Semant., 32, 275, 10.1093/jos/ffu002 Maslova, 2003, Evidentiality in Yukaghir Matthewson, 2004, On the methodology of semantic fieldwork, Int. J. Appl. Logist., 70, 369 Matthewson, 2006, Presuppositions and cross-linguistic variation, 26 Matthewson, 2007, Evidentials as epistemic modals: evidence from St’át’imcets, Linguist. Var. Yearb., 7, 201, 10.1075/livy.7.07mat McCready, 2007, Evidentiality, modality and probability, Ling. Philos., 30, 147, 10.1007/s10988-007-9017-7 Meriçli, 2016 Murray, 2010 Murray, 2014, Varieties of update, Semant. Pragmat., 7, 1 Murray, 2021, The structure of communicative acts, Ling. Philos., 44, 425, 10.1007/s10988-019-09289-0 Muysken, 1995, Focus in Quechua, 375 O'Rourke, 2008, Intonation in Quechua: questions and analysis Pagin, 2021, Assertion Papafragou, 2006, Epistemic modality and truth conditions, Lingua, 116, 1688, 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.009 Recanati, 2006, Pragmatics and semantics, 442 Repp, 2013 San Roque, 2017, Evidentiality and interrogativity, Lingua, 186–187, 120, 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 Sánchez, 2010, Agree and the licensing of wh-words and polarity sensitive items in Southern Quechua, vol. 225, 191 Sánchez, 2010 Sbisà, 2001, Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use, J. Pragmat., 33, 1791, 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00060-6 Searle, 1969 Simons, 2010, What projects and why, vol. 20, 309 Stalnaker, 1978, Assertion Tenny, 2006, Evidentiality, experiencers, and the syntax of sentience in Japanese, J. East Asian Ling., 15, 245, 10.1007/s10831-006-0002-x Tenny, 2003, Configurational properties of point of view roles, 315 Valderrama, 1982 van Elswyk, 2023, Expressing belief with evidentials: a case study with Cuzco Quechua on the dispensability of illocutionary explanation, J. Pragmat., 203, 52, 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.10.003 Vanderveken, 1990, Meaning and speech acts: vol. 1, von Fintel, 2007, An opinionated guide to epistemic modality, vol. 2, 32 Weber, 1986, Information perspective, profile, and patterns in Quechua, 137 Woods, 2014, The syntax of orientation shifting: evidence from English high adverbs, 205 Zimmermann, 2004, Zum wohl: Diskurspartikeln als satztypmodifikatoren, Linguist. Ber., 199, 253 Zu, 2018, Discourse participants and the structural representation of the context.