Congruence in Job-Performance Ratings: A Study of 360 Feedback Examining Self, Manager, Peers, and Consultant Ratings

Arnold, J. & Davey, K. Self-ratings and superior ratings of graduate employe es competence during early career. Journal of Occupation al and Organizational Psychology, 1992, 15, 235–250.

Ashford, S. & Tsui, A. Self-regulation for manage rial e ffectiveness. The role of active feedback see king. Academ y of Managem ent Journal, 1991, 34, 251–280.

Atwater, L., Roush, P., & Fischthal, A. The influence of upward feedback on se lfand follower ratings of leadership. Personnel Psychology, 1995, 48, 35–59.

Bass, B., & Yammarino, F. Congruence of self and others' leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1991, 40, 437–454.

Berger-Gross, V. Difference score me asure of social perceptions revisite d: A comparison of alternative. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1982, 29, 279–284.

Blakeley, G. The e ffects of performance rating discrepancie s on supervisors and subordinates. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 1993, 54, 57–80.

Borman, W. The rating of individuals in organizations. An alterative approach. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1974, 12, 105–124.

Bracken, D. Straight talk about multi-rater feedback. Training and Developm ent, 1994, 48, 44–51.

Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. Conve rgent and discriminant validation by the multi-traitmulti-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.

Campbell, D., & Lee, C. Self appraisal in performance evaluation: Developme nt vs. evaluation. Academ y of Managem ent Review, 1988, 13, 302–314.

Church, A. First-rate multi-rater feedback. Training and Developm ent, 1995, 49, 42–43.

Dunne tte, K. My hamme r or your hammer. Human Resou rce Management, 1993, 32, 373–389.

Fahr, J.-L., Dobbins, G., & Cheng, B. D. Cultural re latively in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and US workers. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44, 129–147.

Furnham, A. Personality at work. London: Routledge, 1994.

Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. Personality and work performance: Myers-Briggs type indicator corre lates of manage rial performance in two cultures. Person ality and Individual Differences, 1993, 14, 145–153.

Furnham, A., & Stringfield P. Congruence of se lf and subordinate ratings of manage rial practice s as a correlate of superior evaluation. Journal of Occupationa l and Organizational Psychology, 1994, 67, 57–67.

Harris, M., & Schaubroeck, J. A meta analysis of self-supervisor, se lf-peer and pee rsupervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 1988, 41, 43–61.

Heneman, H. Comparisons of self-and superior-rating of manage rial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 638–642.

Holzbach, R. Rater bias in performance rating: Supervisor, self and pee r ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 579–588.

Johns, G. Difference score measures of organizational behaviour variable: A critique. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1981, 27, 443–462.

London, M., & Beatty, R. 360° degree feedback as a compe titive advantage. Human Resource Managem ent, 1993, 32, 353–372.

Mabe, P., & West, S. Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and me ta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 280–296.

Maurer, T., & Tarilla, B. Acce ptance of peer upward performance-appraisal systems. Human Resource Managem ent, 1996, 35, 217–241.

Meyer, H. Self-appraisal of job performance. Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 291–295.

Nilsen, W., & Campbell, D. Self-observer rating discrepancies. Human Resource Management, 1993, 32, 265–281.

Reilly, R., Smither, J., & Vasilopoulos, N. A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Person nel Psychology, 1996, 49, 599–612.

Riggio, R., & Cole, E. Agreeme nt between subordinate and superior ratings of supervisory performance and e ffects on self and subordinate job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 1992, 65, 151–158.

Saavedra, R., & Kwin, S. Peer evaluation in se lf-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78, 450–462.

Shore, E., Shore, L., & Thornton, G. Construct validity of self and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment centre. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992, 77, 42–54.

Smither, J., Wohlers, A., & London, H. A field study of reactions to normative versus individualized upward feedback. Group and Organization Managem en t, 1995, 20, 61–89.

Somers, M., & Birnbaum, D. Assessing se lf-appraisal of job performance as an evaluation device: Are the poor results a function of method or me thodology? Human Relations, 1991, 44, 1081–1091.

Thornton, G. Psychometric properties of self-appraisal and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 263–271.

Tsui, A. A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1984, 34, 64–69.

Tsui, A., & Barry, B. Interpersonal affect and rating e rrors. Academy of Man agement Journal, 1986, 29, 586–599.

Vecchio, R. Self-and supervisor-ratings: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1993, 1, 73–83.

Wohlers, A., Hall, M.-J., & London, M. Subordinates rating managers: Organisational and demographic corre lates of self/subordinate agreemen t. Journal of Occupation al and Organisational Psychology, 1993, 66, 263–275.

Wexley, K., Alexander, R., Greenwalt, J., & Couch, M. Attitudinal congruence and similarity as re lated to interpersonal evaluation in manager subordinate dyads. Academy of Managem en t Journal, 1980, 23, 320–330.

Yammarino, F., & Atwater, L. Understanding self-perception accuracy: Implications for human resource management. Human Resou rce Managem ent, 1993, 32, 231–247.