Conditionalization, A New Argument For

Topoi - 1999
Bas C. van Fraassen1
1Princeton University, USA

Tóm tắt

Probabilism in epistemology does not have to be of the Bayesian variety. The probabilist represents a person's opinion as a probability function; the Bayesian adds that rational change of opinion must take the form of conditionalizing on new evidence. I will argue that this is the correct procedure under certain special conditions. Those special conditions are important, and instantiated for example in scientific experimentation, but hardly universal. My argument will be related to the much maligned Reflection Principle (van Fraassen, 1984, 1995), and partly inspired by the work of Brian Skyrms (1987).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Skyrms, B.: 1987, 'Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics', Philosophy of Science 54, 1–20.

van Fraassen, B.: 1984, 'Belief and the Will', Journal of Philosophy 81, 235–256.

van Fraassen, B.: 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van Fraassen, B.: 1995, 'Belief and the Problem of Ulysses and the Sirens', Philosophical Studies 77, 7–37.