Sự Độc Lập Có Điều Kiện và Kích Thước Kích Thước của Các Mô Hình Chẩn Đoán Nhận Thức: Một Bài Kiểm Tra Sự Phù Hợp của Mô Hình
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
#mô hình chẩn đoán nhận thức #phương pháp phi tham số #thống kê chi-bình phương #thuộc tính tiềm ẩn #hiệu suất mô hìnhTài liệu tham khảo
Ayers, E., Nugent, R., & Dean, N. (2008). Skill set profile clustering based on student capability vectors computed from online tutoring data. In R. S. J. de Baker, T. Barnes, & J. E. Beck (Eds.), Educational data mining 2008: proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 210–217). Montréal: International Data Mining Society.
Barnes, T. (2003). The Q-matrix method of fault-tolerant teaching in knowledge assessment and data mining. North Carolina State University, USA. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4612. Accessed March 27, 2011
Chen, W., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289.
Chen, J., de la Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 123–140.
Chen, Y., Liu, J., Xu, G., & Ying, Z. (2015). Statistical analysis of Q-matrix based diagnostic classification models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(510), 850–866.
Chiu, C. Y., & Douglas, J. (2013). A nonparametric approach to cognitive diagnosis by proximity to ideal response patterns. Journal of Classification, 30(2), 225–250.
Chiu, C., Douglas, J., & Li, X. (2009). Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: theory and applications. Psychometrika, 74, 633–655.
de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69, 333–353.
Holland, W. P., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1985). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models (Research Report No. 85 – 47). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Holland, W. P., & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale: LEA.
Junker, B. W. (2011). The role of nonparametric analysis in assessment modeling: then and now. In N. J. Dorans & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Looking back: proceedings of a conference in honor of Paul W. Holland (pp. 67–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kunina-Habenicht, O., Rupp, A. A., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). The impact of model misspecification on parameter estimation and item-fit assessment in log-linear diagnostic classification models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49, 59–81.
Li, S., Simon, R. M., & Gart, J. J. (1979). Small sample properties of the Mantel-Haenszel test. Biometrika, 66, 181–183.
Lim, Y. S. & Drasgow, F. (2017 – accepeted). Nonparametric calibration of item-by-attribute matrix. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
Park, Y., & Lee, Y. (2011). Diagnostic cluster analysis of mathematics skills. IERI Monograph Series: Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 4, 75–107.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumption of item response theory. Psychometrika, 49, 425–436.
Rupp, A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. (2010). Diagnostic assessment: theory, methods, and applications. New York: Guilford.
Tatsuoka, K. (1983). Rule space: an approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345–354.
Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case study for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 195–201.
Wang, S., & Douglas, J. (2015). Consistency of nonparametric classification in cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 80, 85–100.