Concurrent observations of barpress suppression and freezing: Effects of CS modality and on-line vs. off-line training upon posttrial behavior
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Annau, Z., &Kamin, L. J. (1961) The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology,54, 428–432.
Ayres, J. J. B. (1968). Differentially conditioned suppression as a function of shock intensity and incentive.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology,66, 208–210.
Ayres, J. J. B., Berger-Gross, P., Kohler, E. A., Mahoney, W. J., &Stone, S. (1979). Some orderly nonmonotonicities in the trial-by-trial acquisition of conditioned suppression: Inhibition with reinforcement?.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 174–180.
Ayres, J. J. B., Mahoney, W. J., Proulx, D. T., &Benedict, J. O. (1976). Backward conditioning as an extinction procedure.Learning and Motivation,7, 368–381
Ayres, J. J. B., &Quinsey, V. L. (1970). Between-groups incentive effects on conditioned suppression.Psychonomic Science,21, 294–296.
Ayres, J. J. B., &Vigorito, M. (1984). Posttrial effects of presenting vs. omitting expected shock USs in the conditioned suppression procedure: Concurrent measurement of barpress suppression and freezing.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 73–78
Bolles, R. C., &Riley, A. L. (1973). Freezing as an avoidance response: Another look at the operant-respondent distinction.Learning and Motivation,4, 268–275.
Bouton, M. E., &Bolles, R. C. (1980). Conditioned fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 429–434.
Davis, H. (1970). Postshock responding on appetitive schedules: Aggression or discrimination.Psychonomic Science,18, 11–12
Davis, H., &McIntiri, R. W. (1969) Conditioned suppression under positive, negative, and no contingency between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 633–640
Davis, H., Memmott, J., &Hurwirz, H. M. B. (1975) Autocontin-gencies A model for subtle behavioral control.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,104, 169–188
Fanselow, M. S., &Bolles, R. C. (1979) Triggering of the endorphin analgesic reaction by a cue previously associated with shock Reversal by naloxone.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,14, 88–90
Hancock, R. A., &Ayres, J. J. B. (1974) Within-subject effects of sucrose concentration on conditioned suppression of licking.Psychological Record,24, 325–331.
Holland, P. C. (1979) The effects of qualitative and quantitative variation in the US on individual components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned behavior in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 424–432
Hollander, M., &Wolfe, D. A. (1973)Nonparametric statistical methods New York: Wiley
Jacobs, W. J., &LoLordo, V. M. (1980) Constraints on Pavlovian aversive conditioning Implications for avoidance learning in the rat.Learning and Motivation,11, 427–455
LoLordo, V. M. &Randich, A. (1981) Effects of experience of electric shock upon subsequent conditioning of an emotional response. Associative and non-associative accounts In P Harzern & M. H. Zeiler (Eds),Advances in analysis of behavior Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (Vol 2) Sussex, England. Wiley
Reberg, D., &Memmott, J. (1979) Shock as a signal for shock or no-shock. A feature-negative effect in conditioned suppression.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,32, 387–397
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds).Classical conditioning II New York. Appleton-Century-Crofts
Sigmundi, R. A., &Bolles, R. C. (1983) CS modality, context conditioning, and conditioned freezing.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 205–212