Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Các cuộc đàm phán địa phương đồng thời với hàm tiện ích toàn cầu: một phương pháp tham lam
Tóm tắt
Đàm phán Tự động là một lĩnh vực nghiên cứu đang phát triển trong những năm gần đây, vì nó cung cấp một cơ chế cho các tác nhân thông minh đại diện cho con người và các tổ chức để phối hợp hành vi của họ trong một môi trường phức tạp dưới những giả định về sự tự lợi hợp lý. Hầu hết các nghiên cứu trong lĩnh vực này giả định có một chuỗi đàm phán đơn lẻ với hàm tiện ích được xác định rõ cho mỗi tác nhân tham gia, hoặc một tập hợp các cuộc đàm phán đồng thời với một thứ tự kết quả trong mỗi cuộc đàm phán địa phương. Trong bài báo này, chúng tôi xem xét một tác nhân tham gia vào một tập hợp các cuộc đàm phán đồng thời với một hàm tiện ích chỉ được định nghĩa cho toàn bộ tập hợp các thỏa thuận trong tất cả các cuộc đàm phán đó và không có thứ tự kết quả nào được xác định địa phương trong bất kỳ cuộc đàm phán nào. Bài báo trình bày một thuật toán cho phép tác nhân như vậy tối đa hóa tiện ích toàn cầu kỳ vọng của nó bằng cách phối hợp hành vi của mình trong tất cả các chuỗi đàm phán. Hiệu suất của phương pháp đề xuất được phân tích lý thuyết và thực nghiệm thông qua mô phỏng trong bối cảnh một thị trường giao dịch.
Từ khóa
#Đàm phán tự động #tác nhân thông minh #hàm tiện ích #đàm phán đồng thời #tối đa hóa tiện ích #mô phỏng.Tài liệu tham khảo
(2020). UNECE eNegotiation project. Retrieved May 19, 2021, from
https://tinyurl.com/xetbp648
.
citation_journal_title=Knowledge and Information Systems; citation_title=Concurrent bilateral negotiation for open e-markets: The conan strategy; citation_author=B Alrayes, Ö Kafalı, K Stathis; citation_volume=56; citation_issue=2; citation_publication_date=2018; citation_pages=463-501; citation_doi=10.1007/s10115-017-1125-2; citation_id=CR2
citation_title=Alternating offers protocols for multilateral negotiation; citation_inbook_title=Modern approaches to agent-based complex automated negotiation; citation_publication_date=2017; citation_pages=153-167; citation_id=CR3; citation_author=R Aydoğan; citation_author=D Festen; citation_author=KV Hindriks; citation_author=CM Jonker; citation_publisher=Springer
Baarslag, T., & Kaisers, M. (2017). The value of information in automated negotiation: A decision model for eliciting user preferences. In Proceedings of the 16th conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 391–400).
citation_title=A tit for tat negotiation strategy for real-time bilateral negotiations; citation_inbook_title=Complex automated negotiations: Theories, models, and software competitions; citation_publication_date=2013; citation_pages=229-233; citation_id=CR5; citation_author=T Baarslag; citation_author=K Hindriks; citation_author=C Jonker; citation_publisher=Springer
citation_title=Decoupling negotiating agents to explore the space of negotiation strategies; citation_inbook_title=Novel insights in agent-based complex automated negotiation; citation_publication_date=2014; citation_pages=61-83; citation_id=CR6; citation_author=T Baarslag; citation_author=K Hindriks; citation_author=M Hendrikx; citation_author=A Dirkzwager; citation_author=C Jonker; citation_publisher=Springer
Baarslag, T., Gerding, E. H., Aydogan, R., & Schraefel, M. (2015). Optimal negotiation decision functions in time-sensitive domains. In 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology (WI-IAT) (Vol. 2, pp. 190–197). IEEE.
citation_journal_title=Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems; citation_title=Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: A comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques; citation_author=T Baarslag, MJ Hendrikx, KV Hindriks, CM Jonker; citation_volume=30; citation_issue=5; citation_publication_date=2016; citation_pages=849-898; citation_doi=10.1007/s10458-015-9309-1; citation_id=CR8
citation_journal_title=The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization; citation_title=Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: An empirical analysis; citation_author=P Bajari, R McMillan, S Tadelis; citation_volume=25; citation_issue=2; citation_publication_date=2008; citation_pages=372-399; citation_doi=10.1093/jleo/ewn002; citation_id=CR9
Bringmann, K., & Panagiotou, K. (2012). Efficient sampling methods for discrete distributions. In International colloquium on automata, languages, and programming (pp. 133–144). Springer.
citation_journal_title=American Economic Review; citation_title=Auctions versus negotiations; citation_author=J Bulow, P Klemperer; citation_volume=86; citation_issue=1; citation_publication_date=1996; citation_pages=180-194; citation_id=CR11
citation_journal_title=Real Estate Economics; citation_title=Auction versus negotiated sale: Evidence from real estate sales; citation_author=YL Chow, IE Hafalir, A Yavas; citation_volume=43; citation_issue=2; citation_publication_date=2015; citation_pages=432-470; citation_doi=10.1111/1540-6229.12056; citation_id=CR12
citation_journal_title=IEEE Internet Computing; citation_title=Concurrent multiple-issue negotiation for internet-based services; citation_author=J Dang, MN Huhns; citation_volume=10; citation_issue=6; citation_publication_date=2006; citation_pages=42-49; citation_doi=10.1109/MIC.2006.118; citation_id=CR13
citation_journal_title=Automatica; citation_title=Model predictive control: Theory and practice—A survey; citation_author=CE Garcia, DM Prett, M Morari; citation_volume=25; citation_issue=3; citation_publication_date=1989; citation_pages=335-348; citation_doi=10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2; citation_id=CR14
citation_title=Collective voice of experts in multilateral negotiation; citation_inbook_title=PRIMA 2017: Principles and practice of multi-agent systems; citation_publication_date=2017; citation_pages=450-458; citation_id=CR15; citation_author=TD Güneş; citation_author=E Arditi; citation_author=R Aydoğan; citation_publisher=Springer International Publishing
citation_title=CUHKAgent: An adaptive negotiation strategy for bilateral negotiations over multiple items; citation_publication_date=2014; citation_id=CR16; citation_author=J Hao; citation_author=H Leung; citation_publisher=Springer
citation_journal_title=Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems; citation_title=Nb3: A multilateral negotiation algorithm for large, non-linear agreement spaces with limited time; citation_author=D Jonge, C Sierra; citation_volume=29; citation_issue=5; citation_publication_date=2015; citation_pages=896-942; citation_doi=10.1007/s10458-014-9271-3; citation_id=CR17
Jonker, C. M., Aydogan, R., Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Ito, T., & Hindriks, K. V. (2017). Automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC). In AAAI (pp. 5070–5072).
citation_title=AgentK2: Compromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for automated negotiating agents; citation_publication_date=2013; citation_id=CR19; citation_author=S Kawaguchi; citation_author=K Fujita; citation_author=T Ito; citation_publisher=Springer
Kersten, G. E. (2014). Are procurement auctions good for society and for buyers? In Joint international conference on group decision and negotiation (pp. 30–40). Springer.
citation_title=HardHeaded; citation_publication_date=2013; citation_id=CR21; citation_author=T Krimpen; citation_author=D Looije; citation_author=S Hajizadeh; citation_publisher=Springer
citation_journal_title=IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews); citation_title=Bilateral negotiation decisions with uncertain dynamic outside options; citation_author=C Li, J Giampapa, K Sycara; citation_volume=36; citation_issue=1; citation_publication_date=2006; citation_pages=31-44; citation_doi=10.1109/TSMCC.2005.860573; citation_id=CR22
citation_journal_title=Electronic Commerce Research and Applications; citation_title=Integrating multi-agent negotiation to resolve constraints in fulfilling supply chain orders; citation_author=Lin Fr, Lin Yy; citation_volume=5; citation_issue=4; citation_publication_date=2006; citation_pages=313-322; citation_doi=10.1016/j.elerap.2006.04.003; citation_id=CR23
citation_journal_title=Computational Intelligence; citation_title=Genius: An integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators; citation_author=R Lin, S Kraus, T Baarslag, D Tykhonov, K Hindriks, CM Jonker; citation_volume=30; citation_issue=1; citation_publication_date=2014; citation_pages=48-70; citation_doi=10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00463.x; citation_id=CR24
Mohammad, Y. (2021). Optimal deterministic time-based policy in automated negotiation. In PRIMA 2020: Principles and practice of multi-agent systems: 23rd International conference, Nagoya, Japan, November 18–20, 2020, Proceedings 23 (pp. 68–83). Springer International Publishing.
Mohammad, Y., & Nakadai, S. (2018). FastVOI: Efficient utility elicitation during negotiations. In International conference on principles and practice of multi-agent systems (PRIMA) (pp. 560–567). Springer.
Mohammad, Y., & Nakadai, S. (2019). Optimal value of information based elicitation during negotiation. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’19 (pp. 242–250).
Mohammad, Y., Nakadai, S., & Greenwald, A. (2019a). NegMAS: A platform for situated negotiations. In Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on agent-based complex automated negotiations, IJCAI 2019 (pp. 343–351).
Mohammad, Y., Viqueira, E. A., Ayerza, N. A., Greenwald, A., Nakadai, S., & Morinaga, S. (2019b). Supply chain management world. In International conference on principles and practice of multi-agent systems (pp. 153–169). Springer.
Mohammad, Y., Nakadai, S., & Greenwald, A. (2020). NegMAS: A platform for automated negotiations. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on principles and practice of multi-agent systems (pp. 343–351).
citation_journal_title=Theoretical Economics; citation_title=Markets versus negotiations: The predominance of centralized markets; citation_author=Z Neeman, N Vulkan; citation_volume=1; citation_publication_date=2010; citation_pages=6-35; citation_id=CR31
citation_journal_title=Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent System, IEEE Computer Society; citation_title=Coordinating multiple concurrent negotiations; citation_author=TD Nguyen, NR Jennings; citation_volume=3; citation_publication_date=2004; citation_pages=1064-1071; citation_id=CR32
citation_journal_title=Electronic Commerce Research and Applications; citation_title=Managing commitments in multiple concurrent negotiations; citation_author=TD Nguyen, NR Jennings; citation_volume=4; citation_issue=4; citation_publication_date=2005; citation_pages=362-376; citation_doi=10.1016/j.elerap.2005.06.005; citation_id=CR33
Niu, L., Ren, F., & Zhang, M. (2016). A concurrent multiple negotiation mechanism under consideration of a dynamic negotiation environment. In Pacific Rim international conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 779–792). Springer.
Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D. E., & Cantú-Paz, E. (1999). Boa: The Bayesian optimization algorithm. In Proceedings of the 1st annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (Vol. 1, pp. 525–532). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
PRNewswire. (2019). Digital process automation market by component, business function, deployment type, organization size, industry vertical and region—Global forecast to 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2021, from
http://tiny.cc/573o9y
.
citation_journal_title=IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics; citation_title=Complex and concurrent negotiations for multiple interrelated e-markets; citation_author=KM Sim; citation_volume=43; citation_issue=1; citation_publication_date=2012; citation_pages=230-245; citation_id=CR37
citation_journal_title=IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics); citation_title=Concurrent negotiation and coordination for grid resource coallocation; citation_author=KM Sim, B Shi; citation_volume=40; citation_issue=3; citation_publication_date=2009; citation_pages=753-766; citation_id=CR38
citation_journal_title=RAND Journal of Economics; citation_title=A comparison of auctions and multilateral negotiations; citation_author=CJ Thomas, BJ Wilson; citation_volume=33; citation_publication_date=2002; citation_pages=140-155; citation_doi=10.2307/2696379; citation_id=CR39
citation_journal_title=Computers & Industrial Engineering; citation_title=An ontology based approach to organize multi-agent assisted supply chain negotiations; citation_author=G Wang, T Wong, X Wang; citation_volume=65; citation_issue=1; citation_publication_date=2013; citation_pages=2-15; citation_doi=10.1016/j.cie.2012.06.018; citation_id=CR40
citation_journal_title=Games and Economic Behavior; citation_title=Self-confirming price-prediction strategies for simultaneous one-shot auctions; citation_author=MP Wellman, E Sodomka, A Greenwald; citation_volume=102; citation_publication_date=2017; citation_pages=339-372; citation_doi=10.1016/j.geb.2017.01.007; citation_id=CR41
Williams, C. R., Robu, V., Gerding, E. H., & Jennings, N. R. (2012). Negotiating concurrently with unknown opponents in complex, real-time domains. In Proceedings of the twentieth European conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 834–839).
Yavuz, C.O.B., Süslü, Ç., & Aydogan, R. (2020). Taking inventory changes into account while negotiating in supply chain management. In ICAART (1) (pp. 94–103).
