Conceptualizing the transfer of knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary research
Tóm tắt
Transdisciplinary (TD) research is increasingly suggested as a means of tackling wicked problems by providing knowledge on solutions that serve as pathways towards sustainable development. In contrast to research striving for generalizable findings, TD research produces insights for a particular case and context. TD researchers, who build on other TD projects’ results, need to know under what conditions knowledge gained from their case can be transferred to and applied in another case and context. Knowledge transfer between researchers and stakeholders is extensively discussed in the literature. However, a more profound understanding and management of the challenges related to knowledge transfer across cases, as it applies to TD research, are missing. We specify the challenges of knowledge transfer in TD research by distinguishing TD research for policy from conventional evidence-based policy, which relies on generalizing findings, such as randomized controlled trials. We also compare the functions that cases fulfil in other types of research that include basic, applied and ideographic research. We propose to conceptualize transferability of knowledge across cases as arguments by analogy. Methodologically, this would imply explicit consideration on whether the cases in question are sufficiently similar in relevant aspects while not dissimilar in other additional relevant aspects. On the one hand, this approach calls for explicit material considerations that are needed to learn about which aspects of cases are relevant. On the other hand, formal considerations on how to weigh perceived relevant similarities and dissimilarities of the cases at hand for transferability of knowledge, are needed. Empirical research on how projects in TD research deal with this problem is called for.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler CE, Hirsch Hadorn G (2014) The IPCC and treatment of uncertainties: sources of dissensus. WIREs Clim Change 5(5):663–676
Bartha P (2013) Analogy and analogical reasoning. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-analogy/. Accessed 18 Jan 2017
Barzelay M (2007) Learning from second-hand experience: methodology for extrapolation-oriented case research. Governance 20(3):521–543
Baumgärtner S, Becker C, Frank K, Müller B, Quaas M (2008) Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: the role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecol Econ 67(3):384–393
Bengtsson B, Hertting N (2014) Generalization by mechanism: thin rationality and ideal-type analysis in case study research. Philos Soc Sci 44(6):707–732
Bilotta GS, Milner AM, Boyd I (2014) On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environ Sci Policy 42:67–77
Boyd I (2013) Research: a standard for policy-relevant science. Nature 501(7466):159–160
Brunner RD (2010) Adaptive governance as a reform strategy. Policy Sci 43(4):301–341
Brunner RD (2014) Harvesting experience for adapting to climate change. Weather Clim Soc 6(1):5–8
Burdack D, Biewald A, Lotze-Campen H (2014) Cap-and-trade of water rights. A sustainable way out of Australia’s Rural Water Problems? GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 23(4):318–326
Cartwright N (2012) Will this policy work for you? Predicting effectiveness better: how philosophy helps. Philos Sci 79(5):973–989
Cartwright N, Hardie J (2012) Evidence-based policy: a practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091
Chow SJ (2015) Many meanings of ‘heuristic? Brit J Philos Sci 66:977–1016
Crasnov S (2012) The role of case study research in political science: evidence for causal claims. Philos Sci 79:655–666
Creager AN, Lunbeck E, Wise MN (2007) Science without laws: model systems, cases, exemplary narratives. Duke University Press, Durham
Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur REG (2004) Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med 58(1):207–217
Ehrensperger A, Ott C, Wiesmann U (2015) Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme: highlights from 15 years of joint action for sustainable development. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Bern
Elphick HE, Smyth RL (2004) Research: the principles of evidence-based medicine. Curr Paediatr 14(6):525–531
Gallati J, Wiesmann U, An International Group of Co-Editors (2011) System dynamics in transdisciplinary research for sustainable development. In: Wiesmann U, Hurni H (eds) Research for sustainable development: foundations, experiences, and perspectives. Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern, vol 6. Geographica Bernensia, Bern, pp 345–360
Gerring J (2007) Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research, fourth paper back edn. de Gruyter, New York
Gluckman P (2014) Policy: the art of science advice to government. Nature 507(7491):163–165
Gogoi E, Dupar M, Jones L, Martinez C, McNamara L (2014) Enablers for delivering community-based adaptation at scale. Clim Dev 6(4):368–371
Gross M, Hoffmann-Riem H, Krohn W (2005) Realexperimente, Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft. Transcript, Bielefeld
Guba EG, Lincoln YS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS et al (eds) Handbook of qualitative research (Rev. ed. of: Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. c2000. ed., pp. 191–215). Sage Publications, London
Hirsch Hadorn G (1997) Webers Idealtypus als Methode zur Bestimmung des Begriffsinhaltes theoretischer Begriffe in den Kulturwissenschaften. J Gen Philos Sci 28(2):275–296
Hirsch Hadorn G (2017) Case study methodologies. In: Hansson Sven Ove (ed) The ethics of technology: methods and approaches. Rowman and Littlefield, London, pp 99–113
Hirsch Hadorn G, Maier S, Wölfing Kast S (2002) Transdisziplinäre Forschung in Aktion: Optionen und Restriktionen nachhaltiger Ernährung. vdf Hochschulverlag an der ETH Zürich, Zürich
Hirsch Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Bern
Holmes J, Clark R (2008) Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation. Environ Sci Policy 11(8):702–711
Howick J, Glasziou P, Aronson J (2013) Problems with using mechanisms to solve the problem of extrapolation. Theor Med Bioeth 34(4):275–291
Jahn T, Keil F (2015) An actor-specific guideline for quality assurance in transdisciplinary research. Futures 65:195–208
Kiteme BP, Wiesmann U (2008) Sustainable River Basin Management in Kenya: Balancing needs and requirements. In: Hirsch Hadorn G (ed) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Bern, pp 63–78
Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL, Quinn M, Rudel R, Schettler T, Stoto M (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109(9):871–876
Krohn W (2010) Interdisciplinary cases and disciplinary knowledge. In: Frodeman R, Thompson Klein J, Mitcham C (eds) Oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43
Lasswell HD (1971) The transferability of Vicos strategy. In: Dobyns HF, Doughty PL, Lasswell HD (eds) Peasants, power, and applied social change: Vicos as a model. Sage, Beverly Hills
Pawson R (2006) Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. Sage publications, Beverly Hills
Peters GP, Andrew RM, Boden T, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Le Quere C, Marland G, Raupach MR, Wilson C (2013) The challenge to keep global warming below 2 degrees C. Nat Clim Change 3:4–6
Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Oekom, Munich
Polk M (2014) Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustain Sci 9(4):439–451
ProClim (1997) Research on sustainability and global change—visions in science policy by Swiss Researchers. CASS/SANW, Berne
Pullin A, Knight T (2009) Doing more good than harm—building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol Cons 142(5):931–934
Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169
Rose DC (2014) Five ways to enhance the impact of climate science. Nat Clim Change 4(7):522–524
Turnhout E, Bloomfield B, Hulme M, Vogel J, Wynne B (2012) Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature 488(7412):454–455
van den Bosch SJM (2010) Transition experiments: exploring societal changes towards sustainability. Erasmus University, Rotterdam
Walton J (1992) Making the theoretical case. In: Ragin CS, Becker HS (eds) What is a case? Exploring foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 121–137
Weber M (1962) Basic concepts in sociology (H.P. Secher, Trans.). Citadel Press, New York
Wiesmann U, Hurni H (eds) (2011) Research for sustainable development: foundations, experiences, and perspectives. Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South. Geographica Bernensia, Bern
Wiesmann U, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher W, Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Zemp E (2008) Enhancing transdisciplinary research: a synthesis in fifteen propositions. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Bern, pp 433–441
Wuelser G, Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2012) Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: a framework. Sustain Sci 7(1):81–93