Conceptual fragmentation and the rise of eliminativism

Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control. Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer, and S. Kornblum (eds.), Attention and performance, XIV (pp.183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anderson, B. (2011). There is no such thing as attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–8.

Andreasen, R. O. (2000). ‘Race: biological reality or social construct?’ philosophy of science, 67(proceedings), S653-S666.

Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M., & Anderson, M. (2009). Memory. New York: Psychology Press. Reprinted, 2010.

Beall, J. C., & Restall, G. (2006). Logical pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Belot, G. (2007). Is classical electrodynamics an inconsistent theory? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37, 263–282.

Blaxter, M. (2004). Health. Hong Kong: Polity.

Brigandt, I. (2003). Species pluralism does not imply species eliminativism. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1305–1316.

Block, N. (1995) How many concepts of consciousness? reprinted as Ch.10, pp.215–247 in consciousness, function and representation: collected papers, volume 1. USA: MIT Press, 2007.

Capek, V. and D. Sheehan (2005): Challenges to the second law of thermodynamics. Springer.

Carel, H. (2008): Illness: the cry of the flesh. Acumen.

Carnap, R. (1945). The two concepts of probability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 513–532.

Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chalmers, D. J. (2011). Verbal disputes. The Philosophical Review, 120(4), 515–566.

Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.

Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1983). Understanding old words with new meanings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 591–608.

Cooper, R. (2002). Disease. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33(2), 263–282.

Currie, A. and Killin, A. (forthcoming). Music pluralism and the science of music. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 6(1), 9–30.

Duncan, J. (2006). Brain mechanisms of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2–27.

Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ereshefsky, M. (1992a). Eliminative pluralism. Philosophy of Science, 59(4), 671–690.

Ereshefsky, M. (1992b). The units of evolution: essays on the nature of species. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Ereshefsky, M. (1998). Species pluralism and anti-realism. Philosophy of Science, 65(1), 103–120.

Ereshefsky, M. (2001). The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy: A philosophical study of biological taxonomy. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Ereshefsky, M. (2010a). Microbiology and the species problem. Biology and Philosophy, 25, 553–568.

Ereshefsky, M. (2010b). Darwin’s solution to the species problem. Synthese, 175, 405–425.

Ereshefsky, M., & Reydon, T. A. C. (2015). Scientific kinds. Philosophical Studies, 172(4), 969–986.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Fletcher, S. (2012). What counts as a Newtonian system? The view from Norton’s dome. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2, 275–297.

Fodor, J. (1981). The present status of the innateness controversy, in Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). pp.257–316.

Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: where cognitive science went wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.

Frisch, M. (2005). Inconsistency, asymmetry and non-locality. Oxford: OUP.

Frisch, M. (2008). Conceptual problems in classical electrodynamics. Philosophy of Science, 75, 93–105.

Glasgow, J. M. (2003). On the new biology of race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(9), 456–474.

Griffiths, P. E. (1997). What emotions really Are: The problem of psychological categories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Griffiths, P. E. (2002). What is innateness? The Monist, 85(1), 70–85.

Hardimon, M. O. (2003). The ordinary concept of race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(9), 437–455.

Hendry, R. F. (2005). Lavoisier and Mendeleev on the elements. Foundations of Chemistry, 7, 31–48.

Hendry, R. F. (2008). Two conceptions of the chemical bond. Philosophy of Science, 75, 909–920.

Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Hesslow, G. (1993). Do we need a concept of disease? Theoretical Medicine, 14(1), 1–14.

Hill, C. (2009). Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Howe, M. J. A. (1990). Does intelligence exist?, The psychologist, November Issue: pp.490-493.

Irvine, E. (2013). Consciousness as a scientific concept: a philosophy of science perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.

Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kim, J. (1992). Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52(1), 1–26.

Kitcher, P. (1984). Species. Philosophy of Science, 51, 308–333.

Lasersohn, P. (1999). Pragmatic halos. Language, 75, 522–551.

Machery, E. (2005). Concepts are not a natural kind. Philosophy of Science, 72(3), 444–467.

Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Machery, E. (2012). Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life… and why you should as well. Synthese, 185, 145–164.

Magnus, P. D. (2012). What SPECIES can Teach us About THEORY, Unpublished Manuscript. Available here: http://www.fecundity.com/job/paper.php?item=speciesanalogy

Malament, D. B. (2008). Norton’s slippery slope. Philosophy of Science, 75, 799–816.

Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts: core readings. MIT Press.

Maroney, O. J. E. (2007). The Physical Basis of the Gibbs-von Neumann entropy, available Here: http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701127

Mayr, E. (1970). Populations, species, and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mix, J. L. (2015). Defending definitions of life. Astrobiology, 15(1), 15–19.

Muller, F. A. (1997). ). The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics: part I. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 28(1), 35–61.

Muller, F. A. (2011). Reflections on the revolution at Stanford. Synthese, 183(1), 87–114.

Murphy, G. (1997). Polysemy and the creation of novel word meanings, pp.235–265 in Ward, T., Smith, S. & Vaid, J. (eds.) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Needham, P. (1972). Belief, language, and experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Newton-Smith, W. H. (2001). A companion to the philosophy of science. Wiley-Blackwell.

Percival, P. (2000). Probability, Ch.53 in W. H. Newton-Smith (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell.

Plutynski, A. (2004). Explanation in classical population genetics. Philosophy of Science, 71, 1201–1214.

Prinz, J. (2010). Can concept empiricism forestall eliminativism? Mind & Language, 25(5), 612–621.

Rey, G. (2010). Concepts versus conceptions (again). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 221–222.

Sankey, H. (2000): Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science, in R. Nola, H. Sankey (eds.) After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent issues in theories of scientific method, Australasian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 15.

Sankey, H. (2010): Scientific Method, in P. Psillos and M. Curd (eds.) The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science: Routledge.

Schlinger, H. D. (2003). The myth of intelligence. The Psychological Record, 53, 15–32.

Skow, B. (2014). Are there Non-causal explanations (of particular events)? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 445–467.

Shoemaker, D. W. (2007). Personal identity and practical concerns. Mind, 116(462), 317–357.

Sidelle, A. (2007). The method of verbal dispute. Philosophical Topics, 35, 83–113.

Sligte, I. G., Scholte, S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? PloS One, 3(2), e1699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001699 .

Sligte, I. G., Scholte, S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2009). V4 activity predicts the strength of visual short term memory representations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(23), 7432–7438.

Stanford, K., & Kitcher, P. (2000). Refining the causal theory of reference for natural kind terms. Philosophical Studies, 97, 99–129.

Styles, E. (1997). The psychology of attention. Cornwall: Psychology Press.

Taylor, J. H. (2015a). Against unifying accounts of attention. Erkenntnis, 80(1), 39–56.

Taylor, J. H. (2015b). Consciousness and the Heterogeneity of Attention. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Durham, UK.

Taylor, P. C. (2000). Appiah’s uncompleted argument: W. E. B. Du bois and the reality of race. Social Theory and Practice, 26(1), 103–128.

Thagard, P. (1990). Concepts and conceptual change. Synthese, 82(2), 255–274.

Uidhir, C. M., & Magnus, P. D. (2011). Art concept pluralism. Metaphilosophy, 42(1–2), 83–97.

Vickers, P. (2013). Understanding inconsistent science. OUP.

Vickers, P. (2014). Scientific theory eliminativism. Erkenntnis, 79(1), 111–126.

Weiskopf, D. (2009). The plurality of concepts. Synthese, 169, 145–173.

Wilson, M. (2006). Wandering significance. Oxford: OUP.

Wilson, M. (2009). Determinism and the mystery of the missing physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 173–193.

Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad Hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). London: Palgrave.

Woodward, J. (2014). Scientific Explanation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.); URL = < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/scientific-explanation/> .

Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review, 82, 139–168.

Wu, W. (2011). Attention as selection for action, pp.97–116 in C. Mole., W. Wu and D. Smithies (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.