Khả năng xem xét và khả năng: một số khó khăn cho các nhà Hume

Amit, E., Algom, D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2009). “thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image”: The distance dependence of representation. In D. Markman, W. Klein, & J. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 53–68). New York: Taylor and Francis. Balcerak Jackson, M. (2016). On imagining, supposing and conceiving. In A. Kind & P. Kung (Eds.), Knowledge through imagination (pp. 42–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. Berto, F. (2012). Existence as a real property. Dordrecht-New York: Synthse Library, Springer. Berto, F., & Priest, G. (2013). Dialetheism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dialetheism. Byrne, A. (2007). Possibility and imagination. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 125–144. Chalmers, D. (1990). Syntactic transformations and distributed representations. Connection Science, 2, 53–62. Chalmers, D. (2002). Does conceivability entail possibility? In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Conceivability and Possibility (pp. 145–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chihara, C. (1998). The worlds of possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chisholm, R. (1967). Identity through possible worlds: Some questions. Noûs, 1, 1–8. Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67–90. Clark, A. (2014). Mindware. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101, 401–431. Divers, J. (2002). Possible worlds. London: Routledge. Fiocco, M. (2007). Conceivability, imagination and modal knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74, 364–380. Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Fodor, J. (1981). Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71. Ganis, G., Thompson, W., & Kosslyn, S. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 226–241. Gendler, T. (2000). The puzzle of imaginative resistance. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 55–81. Gendler, T. (2011). Imagination. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/imagination. Gendler, T., & Hawthorne, J. (Eds.). (2002). Conceivability and possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Giardino, V. (2010). Intuition and visualization in mathematical problem solving. Topoi, 29, 29–39. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett. Hill, C. (1997). Imagininability, conceivability, possibility and the mind-body problem. Philosophical Studies, 87, 61–85. Hill, C. (2016). Conceivability and possibility. In H. Cappelen, T. Gendler, & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical methodology (pp. 326–347). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (Eds.). (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambrige, MA: MIT Press. Ichikawa, J. (2009). Dreaming and imagination. Mind and Language, 24, 103–121. Jago, M. (2014). The impossible. An essay on hyperintensionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kaplan, D. (1969). Transworld heirlines. In M. Loux (Ed.), The possible and the actual (pp. 88–109). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and words. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 532–554. Kind, A. (2001). Putting the image back in the imagination. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62, 85–109. King, A., & Kung, P. (Eds.). (2016). Knowledge through imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kosslyn, S. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kosslyn, S., & Pomerantz, J. (1977). Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 52–76. Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell. Kung, P. (2010). Imagining as a guide to possibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 620–663. Kung, P. (2014). You really do imagine it: Against error theories of imagination. Nous, 50, 90–120. Langland-Hassan, P. (2016). On choosing what to imagine. In A. Kind & P. Kung (Eds.), Knowledge through imagination (pp. 61–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Marks, D., & Paivio, A. U. (1996). In N. Sheehy, J. Chapman, & W. Conroy (Eds.), Biograhpical Dictionary of Psychology (pp. 432–434). New York: Routledge. Marks, D. (1999). Consciousness, mental imagery and action. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 567–585. Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representationx. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pinker, S. (1980). Mental imagery and the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 109, 354–371. Plantinga, A. (1974). The nature of necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Priest, G. (1998). What is so bad about contradictions? Journal of Philosophy, 95, 410–426. Priest, G. (2005). Towards non-being. The logic and metaphysics of intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd expanded ed. 2016. Priest, G. (2016). Thinking the impossible. Philosophical Studies, page On line first. Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality. Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–25. Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45. Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 157–182. Quine, W. (1948). On what there is. Review of Metaphysics, 48, 21–38. Shephard, R., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. Siegel, S. (2006). Which properties are represented in perception? In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 481–503). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Siewert, C. (1998). The significance of consciousness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Stoljar, D. (2007). Two conceivability arguments compared. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107, 27–44. Strohminger, M. (2015). Perceptual knowledge of nonactual possibilities. Philosophical Perspectives, 29, 363–375. Thomas, N. (2014). Mental imagery. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery. Tye, M. (1991). The imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. van Leeuwen, N. (2016). The imaginative agent. In A. Kind & P. Kung (Eds.), Knowledge through imagination (pp. 85–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wansing, H. (2015). Remarks on the logic of imagination. A step towards understanding doxastic control through imagination. Synthese, On line first. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Wright, C. (2002). The conceivability of naturalism. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Conceivability and possibility (pp. 401–439). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Yablo, S. (1993). Is conceivability a guide to possibility? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 1–42.