Computer analysis of foetal monitoring signals

Dawes, 1985, Improvements in the registration and analysis of fetal heart rate records at the bedside, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 92, 317, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01103.x Bernardes, 1991, The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis, J Perinat Med, 19, 61, 10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.61 Hamilton, 1994, Intrapartum prediction of fetal status and assessment of labour progress, Baill Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 8, 567, 10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80199-3 Keith, 1994, Development, evaluation and validation of an intelligent system for the management of labour, Baill Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 8, 583, 10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80200-7 Paneth, 1993, Electronic fetal monitoring and later outcome, Clin Invest Med, 16, 159 Ayres-de-Campos, 1999, Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 106, 1307, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08187.x Palomäki, 2006, Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation, J Perinat Med, 34, 298, 10.1515/JPM.2006.057 Nunes, 2013, An overview of central fetal monitoring systems in labour, J Perinat Med, 41, 93, 10.1515/jpm-2012-0067 Macones, 2008, The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines, Obstet Gynecol, 112, 661, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181841395 Devoe, 2000, A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 183, 361, 10.1067/mob.2000.107665 Ayres-de-Campos, 2000, SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms, J Matern Fetal Med, 9, 311, 10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<311::AID-MFM12>3.3.CO;2-0 Ayres-de-Campos, 2008, Omniview-SisPorto® 3.5 – a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis, J Perinat Med, 36, 260, 10.1515/JPM.2008.030 FIGO subcommittee on Standards in Perinatal Medicine, 1987, Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 25, 159 Amer-Wahlin, 2007, Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance, BJOG, 114, 1191, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x Costa, 2010, Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians, J Perinat Med, 38, 191, 10.1515/jpm.2010.030 Costa, 2009, Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 201, 464.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.033 Costa, 2010, Access to computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocographs improves clinicians' prediction of newborn umbilical artery blood pH, BJOG, 117, 1288, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02645.x Amorim-Costa, 2011, Audit of a fetal central monitoring station in a clinical setting, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 24, 1249, 10.3109/14767058.2011.572201 Ayres-de-Campos, 2010, A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 10, 71, 10.1186/1471-2393-10-71 Parer, 2010, Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 203, 451.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.037 Elliott, 2010, Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 202, 258.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.026 Hamilton, 2012, Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter?, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 25, 648, 10.3109/14767058.2011.594118 Keith, 1994, Preliminary evaluation of an intelligent system for the management of labour, J Perinat Med, 22, 345 Keith, 1995, A multicentre comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 102, 688, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11425.x Schiermeier, 2008, Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study, BJOG, 115, 1557, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01857.x Schiermeier, 2011, Intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum cardiotocography: a multicenter study comparing the FIGO classification with computer analysis software, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 72, 169, 10.1159/000327133 Bernardes, 2010, The persistent challenge of foetal heart rate monitoring, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 22, 104, 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328337233c Williams, 2004, Cardiotocography and medicolegal issues, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 18, 457, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.005