Computational thinking skills of gifted and talented students in integrated STEM activities based on the engineering design process: The case of robotics and 3D robot modeling

Adams, 2008 Andersen, 2014, Visual–spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education, Roeper Review, 36, 114, 10.1080/02783193.2014.884198 Atman, 2007, Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners, Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 359, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x Barr, 2011, Bringing computational thinking to K-12, ACM Inroads, 2, 48, 10.1145/1929887.1929905 Berland, 2014, High school student perceptions of the utility of the engineering design process: Creating opportunities to engage in engineering practices and apply math and science content, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 705, 10.1007/s10956-014-9498-4 Brennan, 2012 Brophy, 2008, Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 369, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x Brown, 2018, How to discuss books with your kids (Even when you haven't read them!), Parenting for High Potential, 7, 12 Bybee, 2013 Callahan, 2015, What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students, American Educational Research Journal, 52, 137, 10.3102/0002831214549448 Carlson, 2004, Exploiting design to inspire interest in engineering across the K–16 engineering curriculum, International Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 372 Choi, 2014, Opportunities to explore for gifted STEM students in Korea: From admissions criteria to curriculum, Theory into Practice, 53, 25, 10.1080/00405841.2014.862117 Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Cooper, 2010, K-12 computational learning, Communications of the ACM, 53, 27, 10.1145/1839676.1839686 Cross, 2000 Cross, 2008, The psychology of gifted adolescents as measured by the MMPI-A, Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 326, 10.1177/0016986208321810 Denning, 2009, The profession of IT beyond computational thinking, Communications of the ACM, 52, 28, 10.1145/1516046.1516054 Dorie, 2014, Capturing the design thinking of young children interacting with a parent Drain, 2008 Dym, 2005, Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning, Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x Eguchi, 2016, RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 692, 10.1016/j.robot.2015.05.013 Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A.P., .& Cardella, M.E. (.2020). Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: Capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s10798-020-09562-5. Ericsson, 2014, Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms, Intelligence, 45, 81, 10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001 Fortus, 2004, Design-based science and student learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1081, 10.1002/tea.20040 Foundation for Critical Thinking (2015). Elements and standards learning tool. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/analyzing-and-assessing-thinking-/783. Frykholm, 2005, Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers, School Science and Mathematics, 105, 127, 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x Fusco, 2014 Futschek, 2006, Algorithmic thinking: The key for understanding computer science, 159 Gotlieb, 2016, Cultivating the social-emotional imagination in gifted education: Insights from educational neuroscience, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 22, 10.1111/nyas.13165 Grover, 2013, Computational thinking in K-12 a review of the state of the field, Educational Researcher, 42, 38, 10.3102/0013189X12463051 Guilford, 1959, Traits of creativity, 142 Gura, M. (2011). Getting started with LEGO robotics: A guide for K-12 educators. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/images/excerpts/ROBOTS-excerpt.pdf. Han, 2019, Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea, Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5, 1, 10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6 Hinton, 2017 Hmelo, 2000, Designing to learn complex systems, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247, 10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_2 Hockett, 2009, Curriculum for highly able learners that conforms to general education and gifted education quality indicators, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 394, 10.4219/jeg-2009-857 Hynes, 2012, Middle-school teachers’ understanding and teaching of the engineering design process: A look at subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 345, 10.1007/s10798-010-9142-4 Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., & Hammer, D. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. Retrieved from http://ncete.org/flash/pdfs/Infusing%20Engineering%20Hynes.pdf. International Technology Education Association, 2000 ISTE (2015). CT leadership toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/ct-leadershipt-toolkit.pdf? sfvrsn¼4. Jang, 2013, Exploring the characteristics of science gifted students’ task commitment, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33, 1, 10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.001 Katai, 2014, The challenge of promoting algorithmic thinking of both sciences- and humanitiesoriented learners, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 287, 10.1111/jcal.12070 Keith, K., Sullivan, F., & Pham, D. (2019). Roles, collaboration, and the development of computational thinking in a robotics learning environment. In S. C. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational thinking education (pp. 223–245). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6528-718. Kelley, 2013 Korkmaz, 2017, Avalidity and reliability study of the Computational Thinking Scales (CTS), Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 Kules, 2016, Computational thinking is critical thinking: Connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes Lee, 2013, The development and the effects of educational program applied on STEAM for the mathematical prodigy, Education of Primary School Mathematics, 16, 35, 10.7468/jksmec.2013.16.1.035 Lin, 2021, Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking, International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1, 10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9 Lou, 2011, The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 195, 10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8 Mann, 2017, Engineering design and gifted pedagogy, 33 Mehalik, 2008, Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x Meyrick, 2011, How STEM education improves student learning, Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal, 14, 1 Miedijensky, 2016, Reflection and assessment for learning in science enrichment courses for the gifted, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 1, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.05.001 Miles, 1994 Moore, 2014, Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration, Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 15, 5 Morrison, 2006 National Academy of Engineering, 2005 National Research Council & National Academy of Engineering, 2009 National Research Council, 2009 National Research Council, 2011 NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Noh, 2017, An analysis of the interpersonal competence of science-gifted students in school and science gifted education institutes, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37, 383 Pólya, 2004 Renzulli, 2006, Operation Houndstooth intervention: Social capital in today's schools, Gifted Child Today, 29, 14, 10.4219/gct-2006-189 Resnick, 2009, Scratch, Communications of the ACM, 52, 60, 10.1145/1592761.1592779 Robinson, 2014, The effects of a science-focused STEM intervention on gifted elementary students’ science knowledge and skills, Journal of Advanced Academics, 25, 189, 10.1177/1932202X14533799 Roman, 2012 Schroth, 2017, Gifted & Green: Sustainability/environmental science investigations that promote gifted children's learning, Gifted Child Today, 40, 14, 10.1177/1076217516675903 Shadduck, 2017, Comprehensive Cocurricular support promotes persistence of community college STEM students, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41, 719, 10.1080/10668926.2016.1222506 Shaunessy, 2000, Techniques questioning in the gifted classroom?, Gifted Child Today, 23, 14, 10.4219/gct-2000-752 Shim, 2005, Science gifted learning program: Research and education model, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25, 635 Smith, 2005, Pedagogies of engagement. Classroom-based practices, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 87, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x Snalune, 2015, The benefits of computational thinking, ITNOW, 57, 58, 10.1093/itnow/bwv111 Song, 2017, A study on perceptions of scientifically gifted middle school students about engineering design process, Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 37, 835 Stake, 1995 Standl, 2016, A case study on cooperative problem solving processes in small 9th grade student groups Steenbergen-Hu, 2017, Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on stem pathways: The role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experience, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40, 99, 10.1177/0162353217701022 Stoeger, 2017, Online mentoring as an extracurricular measure to encourage talented girls in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics): An empirical study of one-on-one versus group mentoring, Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 239, 10.1177/0016986217702215 Thomas, 2018, A neurocomputational model of developmental trajectories of gifted children under a polygenic model: When are gifted children held back by poor environments?, Intelligence, 69, 200, 10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.008 Tofel-Grehl, 2017, STEM high schools teachers’ belief regarding STEM student giftedness, Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 40, 10.1177/0016986216673712 Trilling, 2009 Trna, 2015, Implementation of fostering giftedness in science teacher training, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6, 18 Vallance, 2015, A situation that we had never imagined: Post-Fukushima virtual collaborations for determining robot task metrics, International Journal of Learning Technology, 10, 30, 10.1504/IJLT.2015.069453 Vallance, 2018, Mapping computational thinking for a transformative pedagogy, 301 VanTassel-Baska, 2008, An overview of alternative assessment measures for gifted learners and the issues that surround their use, 1 Wahono, 2020, Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes, International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 36, 10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1 Walsh, 2014 Welch, 2011, The effect of robotics competitions on high school students' attitudes toward science, School Science & Mathematics, 111, 416, 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00107.x Wendell, 2013, Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school, Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 513, 10.1002/jee.20026 Wendell, 2015, Engineering design as disciplinary discourse: An exploration of language demands and resources among urban elementary students Wing, 2006, Computational thinking, Communications of the ACM, 49, 33, 10.1145/1118178.1118215 Wing, 2008, Computational thinking and thinking about computing, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366, 3717 Yadav, 2017, Computational thinking for teacher education, Communications of the ACM, 60, 55, 10.1145/2994591 Yin, 2006, Case study methods, 111 Yoon, 2017, Exploring the spatial ability of undergraduate students: Association with gender, STEM majors, and gifted program membership, Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 313, 10.1177/0016986217722614