Compressive and tensile behaviour of concrete subjected to high rate of loading
Tóm tắt
The present study describes the dynamic tensile and compressive behaviour of concrete with respect to failure (damage) and material characteristics. The dynamic compression and tension tests were performed by using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar setup of 65 mm diameter of bars. The cylindrical specimen tested under dynamic loading conditions was ~ 30 mm in length with two different diameters (30 mm and 45 mm). The quasi-static compressive and splitting tensile strength of concrete was found to be 49.48 and 5.42 MPa, respectively. Dynamic testing showed a significant 78% increase in compressive strength as the strain rate increased from 1.33 × 10–4 to 284 s−1. Likewise, tensile strength increased by approximately 303.4% when the strain rate increased from 6.67 × 10–4 to 14.95 s−1, demonstrating concrete high strain rate sensitivity to dynamic tension. Under dynamic compression, the concrete strength increases due to the formation of the large number of cracks and high lateral confinement. In addition, the crushing density of concrete specimens has been increased with an increase in strain rate. During dynamic tensile failure, the specimen split into two semi-cylindrical pieces at low strain rate. Concurrently, localized crushing occurred at a high strain rate due to stress concentration at loading points. As the strain rate increased further, it intensified the localized crushing, ultimately giving rise to the formation of a wedge region followed by crushing zone.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Chen Z, Fang H, Zhu L, Mao Y, Liu W (2020) Experimental tests and numerical simulations of circular reinforced concrete piers under ship impact. Adv Bridge Eng 1(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.016
Yoo DY, Banthia N (2017) Mechanical and structural behaviors of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to impact and blast. Constr Build Mater 149:416–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.136
Jiricek P, Foglar M (2015) Numerical simulation of the effect of regular and sub-caliber projectiles on military bunkers. In: EPJ web of conferences, vol 94. EDP Sciences, p 04049. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159404049
Do TV, Pham TM, Hao H (2019) Impact force profile and failure classification of reinforced concrete bridge columns against vehicle impact. Eng Struct 183:443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.040
Qiao PZ, Fan W (2014) Identifying damage in honeycomb fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite sandwich bridge decks. In: Advanced composites in bridge construction and repair. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097019.1.94
Wang W, Morgenthal G, Helmrich M (2020) Damage identification of a single RC column subjected to barge impact based on optimization strategies. Ocean Eng 216:107979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107979
Wang W, Wang X, Fu J, Lu Z, Zhou R, Shao Y, et al (2023) A novel frame-type crashworthy device for protecting bridge piers from vehicle collisions. In: Structures, vol 57. Elsevier, p 105313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105313
Bischoff PH, Perry SH (1991) Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates. Mater Struct 24:425–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472016
Rizwanullah, Sharma HK (2022) Blast loading effects on UHPFRC structural elements: a review. Innovat Infrastruct Solut 7(6):341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00937-2
Pająk M (2011) The influence of the strain rate on the strength of concrete taking into account the experimental techniques
Chen WW, Song B (2010) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar: design, testing and applications. Springer, Berlin
ASTM International Committee C09 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates (2017) Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM international
Barton N (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. ISRM Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts 15(6):319–368
Tedesco JW, Ross CA (1993) Experimental and numerical analysis of high strain rate splitting-tensile tests. Mater J 90(2):162–169. https://doi.org/10.14359/4013
Chen X, Ge L, Zhou J, Wu S (2017) Dynamic Brazilian test of concrete using split Hopkinson pressure bar. Mater Struct 50(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0885-6
Zhou Z, Li X, Zou Y, Jiang Y, Li G (2014) Dynamic Brazilian tests of granite under coupled static and dynamic loads. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(2):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0441-4
Wang QZ, Li W, Xie HP (2009) Dynamic split tensile test of flattened Brazilian disc of rock with SHPB setup. Mech Mater 41(3):252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.10.004
Malvar LJ, Ross CA (1998) Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension. ACI Mater J 95:735–739
Riisgaard B, Ngo T, Mendis P, Georgakis CT, Stang H (2007) Dynamic increase factors for high performance concrete in compression using split Hopkinson pressure bar. In: 6th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures, pp 1–3
Brara A, Klepaczko JR (2006) Experimental characterization of concrete in dynamic tension. Mech Mater 38(3):253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.06.004
Li QM, Meng H (2003) About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Int J Solids Struct 40(2):343–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00526-7
Le Nard H, Bailly P (2000) Dynamic behaviour of concrete: the structural effects on compressive strength increase. Mech Cohes Frict Mater Int J Exp Model Comput Mater Struct 5(6):491–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1484(200008)5:6%3c491::AID-CFM106%3e3.0.CO;2-R
Cotsovos DM, Pavlović MN (2008) Numerical investigation of concrete subjected to compressive impact loading. Part 1: a fundamental explanation for the apparent strength gain at high loading rates. Comput Struct 86(12):145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.014
Tang T, Malvern LE, Jenkins DA (1992) Rate effects in uniaxial dynamic compression of concrete. J Eng Mech 118(1):108–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:1(108)
Al-Salloum Y, Almusallam T, Ibrahim SM, Abbas H, Alsayed S (2015) Rate dependent behavior and modeling of concrete based on SHPB experiments. Cement Concr Compos 55:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.011
Chen X, Wu S, Zhou J (2013) Experimental and modeling study of dynamic mechanical properties of cement paste, mortar, and concrete. Constr Build Mater 47:419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.063
Shemirani AB, Naghdabadi R, Ashrafi MJ (2016) Experimental and numerical study on choosing proper pulse shapers for testing concrete specimens by split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus. Constr Build Mater 125:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.045
Cai Y, Ren HQ, Long ZL, Guo RQ, Du KM, Chen SS, Zheng ZH (2022) Comparison study on the impact compression mechanical properties of coral aggregate concrete and ordinary Portland concrete. In: Structures, vol 44. Elsevier, pp 1403–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.055
Ping Q, Fang Z, Ma D, Zhang H (2020) Coupled static-dynamic tensile mechanical properties and energy dissipation characteristic of limestone specimen in SHPB tests. In: Advances in civil engineering, 2020
Yang F, Ma H, Jing L, Zhao L, Wang Z (2015) Dynamic compressive and splitting tensile tests on mortar using split Hopkinson pressure bar technique. Latin Am J Solids Struct 12:730–746. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78251513
Chen X, Wu S, Zhou J (2014) Quantification of dynamic tensile behavior of cement-based materials. Constr Build Mater 51:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.039
Ahmad S, Bhargava P, Chourasia A, Usmani A (2020) Effect of elevated temperatures on the shear-friction behaviour of concrete: experimental and analytical study. Eng Struct 225:111305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111305
Ahmad S, Bhargava P, Bhandari NM (2018) Evaluation of shear transfer capacity of reinforced concrete exposed to fire. In: 12th fib International Ph.d. symposium in civil engineering. Czech Technical University
Ahmad S, Bhargava P, Chourasia A (2020) Direct shear failure in concrete joints exposed to elevated temperatures. In: Structures, vol 27. Elsevier, pp 1851–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.074
Ahmad S, Bhargava P, Chourasia A, Ju M (2021) Residual shear strength of reinforced concrete slender beams without transverse reinforcement after elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 237:112163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112163
IS: 10262:2019 Concrete Mix Proportioning—Guidelines
IS: 456:2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice
IS 516: 1959 Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete
Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc 162(11):676. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302
Khan MM, Iqbal MA (2023) Design, development, and calibration of split Hopkinson pressure bar system for Dynamic material characterization of concrete. Int J Protect Struct. https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196231155947
Khan MM, Iqbal MA (2023) Dynamic response of concrete subjected to high rate of loading: a parametric study. Mech Solids 58:1378–1394. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423600915
Cao S, Yilmaz E, Song W (2018) Dynamic response of cement-tailings matrix composites under SHPB compression load. Constr Build Mater 186:892–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.009
Khan MM, Iqbal MA (2023) Strain rate and size effects on dynamic compressive behaviour of standard and high-strength concrete. Mater Struct 56:176. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02266-x
(1990) Comite Euro-International du Beton-Federation Internationale de la Precontrainte. CEB-FIP Model Code 90 Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, Great Britain
Tedesco JW, Ross CA (1998) Strain-rate-dependent constitutive equations for concrete. J Pressure Vessel Technol 398:405. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2842350
Zhou XQ, Hao H (2008) Modelling of compressive behaviour of concrete-like materials at high strain rate. Int J Solids Struct 45(17):4648–4661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.002
Grote DL, Park SW, Zhou M (2001) Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: I. Experimental characterization. Int J Impact Eng 25(9):869–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00020-3
Katayama M, Itoh M, Tamura S, Beppu M, Ohno T (2007) Numerical analysis method for the RC and geological structures subjected to extreme loading by energetic materials. Int J Impact Eng 34(9):1546–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.10.013
Li QM, Lu YB, Meng H (2009) Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests Part II: numerical simulations. Int J Impact Eng 36(12):1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.04.010
Chen J, Zhuang J, Shen S, Dong S (2022) Experimental investigation on the impact resistance of rubber self-compacting concrete. In: Structures, vol 39. Elsevier, pp 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.057
Xie H, Yang L, Zhu H, Zhang Q, Deng X, Wei P, Lü J (2022) Energy dissipation and fractal characteristics of basalt fiber reinforced concrete under impact loading. In: Structures, vol 46. Elsevier, pp 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.086
Wu M, Qin C, Zhang C (2014) High strain rate splitting tensile tests of concrete and numerical simulation by mesoscale particle elements. J Mater Civ Eng 26(1):71–82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000776
Soroushian P, Choi KB, Alhamad A (1986) Dynamic constitutive behavior of concrete. J Proc 83(2):251–259. https://doi.org/10.14359/10423
Komlos K (1970) Investigation of rheological properties of concrete in uniaxial tension. Mater Test 12(9):300–304
Xiao S, Li H, Monteiro PJM (2010) Influence of strain rates and load histories on the tensile damage behaviour of concrete. Mag Concr Res 62(12):887–894. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2010.62.12.887