Hiệu suất toàn diện của cơ chế hỗ trợ lò xo giá rẻ cho xử lý ánh sáng kỹ thuật số

Jandyal A, Chaturvedi I, Wazir I, Raina A, Haq MIU (2022) 3D printing–a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustain Oper Comput 3:33–42 Dezaki ML, Serjouei A, Zolfagharian A, Fotouhi M, Moradi M, Ariffin MKA and Bodaghi M (2022). A Rev iew on additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of directed energy deposition (DED) process. Adv Powder Mat 100054 Moradi M, Aminzadeh A, Rahmatabadi D, Hakimi A (2021) Experimental investigation on mechanical characterization of 3D printed PLA produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Mat Res Express 8(3):035304 Ghanavati R, Naffakh-Moosavy H, Moradi M (2021) Additive manufacturing of thin-walled SS316L-IN718 functionally graded materials by direct laser metal deposition. J Market Res 15:2673–2685 Mostafa KG, Arshad M, Ullah A, Nobes DS, Qureshi AJ (2020) Concurrent modelling and experimental investigation of material properties and geometries produced by projection microstereolithography. Polymers 12(3):506 Li Y, Mao Q, Li X, Yin J, Wang Y, Fu J, Huang Y (2019) High-fidelity and high-efficiency additive manufacturing using tunable pre-curing digital light processing. Addit Manuf 30:100889 Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma QP, Jancar L, Jansa J, Stefek P, Mesicek J (2021) A review of vat photopolymerization technology: materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3d printing. Polymers 13(4):598 Wang J, Das S, Rai R, Zhou C (2018) Data-driven simulation for fast prediction of pull-up process in bottom-up stereo-lithography. Comput Aided Des 99:29–42 Ding H, Dong M, Zheng Q and Wu ZL (2022) Digital light processing 3D printing of hydrogels:a minireview. Mol Syst Des Eng 7(9):1017–1029 Santoliquido O, Colombo P, Ortona A (2019) Additive Manufacturing of ceramic components by Digital Light Processing: a comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. J Eur Ceram Soc 39(6):2140–2148 Gritsenko D, Yazdi AA, Lin Y, Hovorka V, Pan Y, Xu J (2017) On characterization of separation force for resin replenishment enhancement in 3D printing. Addit Manuf 17:151–156 Pan Y, He H, Xu J, Feinerman A (2017) Study of separation force in constrained surface projection stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):353–361 Ambrosio D, Gabrion X, Malecot P, Amiot F, Thibaud S (2020) Influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical properties of projection stereolithography–manufactured specimens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(1):265–277 Mostafa KG, Arshad M, Ullah A, Nobes DS, Qureshi AJ (2020) Concurrent modelling and experimental investigation of material properties and geometries produced by projection microstereolithography. Polymers 12(3):506 He H, Xu J, Yu X and Pan Y (2018) Effect of constrained surface texturing on separation force in projection stereolithography. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(9) Jiang Y, Wang Y, He H, Feinerman A, Pan Y (2020) Constrained window design in projection stereolithography for continuous three-dimensional printing. 3D Print Addit Manuf 7(4):163–169 Wu X, Xu C, Zhang Z (2021) Flexible film separation analysis of LC. J Mat Process Technol 243:288116916 Li Y, Mao Q, Li X, Yin J, Wang Y, Fu J, Huang Y (2019) High-fidelity and high-efficiency additive manufacturing using tunable pre-curing digital light processing. Addit Manuf 30:100889 Li X, Kang X, Xiao H, Duan Y (2022) Low adhesion continuous constrained-surface projection stereolithography process based on curing degree control. Addit Manuf 54:102743 Alamdari A, Lee J, Kim M, Emon MOF, Dhinojwala A, Choi JW (2020) Effects of surface energy reducing agents on adhesion force in liquid bridge microstereolithography. Addit Manuf 36:101522 Wang JC, Ruilova M and Lin YH (2017) The development of an active separation method for bottom-up stereolithography system. In 2017 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), IEEE: 108–114 Wu X, Lian Q, Li D, Jin Z (2017) Tilting separation analysis of bottom-up mask projection stereolithography based on cohesive zone model. J Mater Process Technol 243:184–196 Wu X, Lian Q, Li D, Jin Z (2017) Tilting separation analysis of bottom-up mask projection stereolithography based on cohesive zone model. J Mat Process Technol 243:288 Jin J, Yang J, Mao H, Chen Y (2018) A vibration-assisted method to reduce separation force for stereolithography. J Manuf Process 34:793–801 Xu Y, Zhu Y, Sun Y, Jin J, Chen Y (2021) A vibration-assisted separation method for constrained-surface-based stereolithography. J Manuf Sci Eng 143(5) Lin YS, Yang CJ (2019) Spring assisting mechanism for enhancing the separation performance of digital light process 3D printers. IEEE Access 7:71718–71729 Khadilkar A, Wang J, Rai R (2019) Deep learning–based stress prediction for bottom-up SLA 3D printing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(5):2555–2569 Yadegari F, Fesharakifard R, Barazandeh F (2021) Numerical and experimental investigation of effective parameters on separation force in bottom-up stereolithography process. AUT J Mech Eng 5(3):4–4 Gritsenko D, Paoli R, Xu J (2022) The effect of acceleration on the separation force in constrained-surface stereolithography. Appl Sci 12(1):442 He H, Yang Y, Pan Y (2018) Machine learning for modeling of printing speed in continuous projection stereolithography. In?2018 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. University of Texas at Austin Wang J, Das S, Rai R, Zhou C (2018) Data-driven simulation for fast prediction of pull-up process in bottom-up stereo-lithography. Comput Aided Des 99:29–42 Kudo 3D. Available: https://www.kudo3d.com/. Accessed 8 Aug 2022 MiSUMi. Available: https://www.misumi.co.jp/english/. Accessed 8 Aug 2022 3DM Advanced Materials. Available:https://www.3dm-shop.com/. Accessed 8 Aug 2022 OMEGA Engineering. Available:https://www.omega.com/pptst/LC201.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2022 National Instruments. Available:http://www.ni.com/en-gb/support/model.usb-6002.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2022 Kovalenko I, Garan M, Shynkarenko A, Zeleny P, Safka J (2016) Examining the relationship between forces during stereolithography 3D printing and geometric parameters of the model. In?MATEC Web of Conferences? (Vol. 40, p. 02005). EDP Sciences Yogesh P, Richa P, Chandrashekhar NS. and Karunakaran KP (2019) Layer separation mechanisms in DLP 3D Printing. In Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Joining. Springer, Singapore. 179–187 Zamheri A, Seprianto DRSC and Persada T (2020) The effect of parameter process 3D printer technology digital light processing to geometric of shaft. In Forum in Research, Science and Technology (FIRST). Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya: 239–243 Putra DP, Yanis M, Seprianto D, Amrillah N and Basri H (2021) Optimization of production process parameters of DLP type 3D printer design for product roughness value. In 4th Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST-T1-T2–2020), Atlantis Press: 179–183 Yadegari F, Fesharakifard R, Barazandeh F (2021) Numerical and experimental investigation of effective parameters on separation force in bottom-up stereolithography process. AUT Journal of Mechanical Engineering 5(3):4–4