Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) 3.0: a software review
Tóm tắt
Comparative analyses of different publications on the same topic are becoming increasingly popular in several areas of marketing research. Especially in research strands with many different empirical studies, there is a strong need for a systematic method to verify the multitude of results. Meta-analysis is such a method to empirically synthesize multiple research results. This software review examines probably the most popular software for the implementation of meta-analyses: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) 3.0 (
https://www.meta-analysis.com/
).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bax, L., L.M. Yu, N. Ikeda, and K.G. Moons. 2007. A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 7 (1): 1–9.
Beaubien, J.M. 2003. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology 56 (1): 291–293.
Bijmolt, Tammo H.A.., H.J. van Heerde, and R.G.M. Pieters. 2005. New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research 42 (2): 141–156.
Borenstein, M. (2022) Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. In: M. Egger, J.P. Higgins and G.D. (eds.) Smith Systematic Reviews in Health Research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 535–548
Borenstein, M., and J.P. Higgins. 2013. Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prevention Science 14 (2): 134–143.
Crocetti, E. 2016. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis: why, when, and how? Emerging Adulthood 4 (1): 3–18.
Edeling, A., and A. Himme. 2018. When does market share matter? New empirical generalizations from a meta-analysis of the market share – performance relationship. Journal of Marketing 82 (3): 1–24.
Franke, G.R., and J.-E. Park. 2006. Salesperson adaptive selling behavior and customer orientation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (6): 693–702.
Hansen, C., H. Steinmetz, and J. Block. 2022. How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: A practical guide. Management Review Quarterly 72: 1–19.
Jager, N.W., J. Newig, E. Challies, E. Kochskämper, and H. von Wehrden. 2022. Case study meta-analysis in the social sciences. Insights on data quality and reliability from a large-N case survey. Research Synthesis Methods 13 (1): 12–27.
Leontyev, A., A. Chase, S. Pulos, and P. Varma-Nelson. 2017. Assessment of the effectiveness of instructional interventions using a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis package. In Computer-aided data analysis in chemical education research (CADACER): advances and avenues, ed. T. Gupta, 117–132. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.
Pang, Z., G. Zhou, J. Chong, and J. Xia. 2021. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Global Metabolomics Datasets. Metabolites 11 (44): 1–14.
Paul, J., and M. Barari. 2022. Meta-analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? Psychology & Marketing 39: 1099–1115.
Rana, J., and J. Paul. 2020. Health motive and the purchase of organic food: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Consumer Studies 44: 162–171.
Suurmond, R., H. van Rhee, and T. Hak. 2017. Introduction, comparison, and validation of meta-essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods 8 (4): 537–553.
Wampold, B.E., H. Ahn, and D. Kim. 2000. Meta-analysis in the social sciences: A useful way to make sense of a series of findings from a large number of studies. Asia Pacific Education Review 1 (1): 67–74.
Wang, P., E. Bradlow, and E. George. 2014. Meta-analyses using information reweighting: An application to online advertising. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 12 (2): 209–233.