Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio‐technical systems

Emerald - 2011
Sean P.Goggins1, JamesLaffey2, MichaelGallagher1
1College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA
2University of Missouri – Columbia School of Information Science and Learning Technologies, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper has two purposes. First, to provide insight into the formation of completely online small groups, paying special attention to how their work practices develop, and how they form identity. Second, to pursue conceptual development of a more multi‐level view of completely online group experience, which can be made visible through analysis of the unique interaction logging system used in this study.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conduct a mixed methods study that integrates interviews, grounded theory analysis, case study methods and social network analysis to build a multi‐layered view of completely online group and community development.FindingsCompletely online group formation is explicated as a socio‐technical system. The paper identifies themes of tool uptake and use, and patterns of interaction that accompany group formation and development of completely online group practices. These patterns show little respect for the boundaries of space and time. It then shows how groups who are paired together for two non‐sequential activities develop a common internal structural arrangement in the second activity, and are viewable as groups in the larger course context in four of six cases.Research limitations/implicationsThe time bounded nature of the group and community, combined with the educational context limit the generalizability of these findings.Practical implicationsThe study shows how completely online group development can be made visible. Managers of work teams and teachers who work with classrooms in completely online contexts need to recognize the dynamic structure and interaction practices of completely online teams.Originality/valueFirst, little research has been conducted on completely online group formation. Second, a conceptual understanding of how group members relate to one another and how groups interact with other groups in the same socio‐technical context is not explored in prior work. Third, the paper performs this analysis including data from rich, contextualized usage logs, which enables greater insight into online group interactivity than prior research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adamic, L. and Adar, E. (2005), “How to search a social network”, Social Networks, Vol. 27, pp. 187‐203.

Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E. and Berdahl, J.L. (2000), Small Groups as Complex Systems, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York, NY.

Backstrom, L., Kumar, R., Marlow, C., Novak, J. and Tomkins, A. (2008), “Preferential behavior in online groups”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining.

Barabasi, A.L. (2009), “Scale‐free networks: a decade and beyond”, Science, Vol. 325 No. 5939, pp. 412‐3.

Birnholtz, J.P., Gutwin, C. and Hawkey, K. (2007), “Privacy in the open: how attention mediates awareness and privacy in open‐plan offices”, Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work.

Blanchard, A.L. and Markus, M.L. (2002), “Sense of virtual community – maintaining the experience of belonging”, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Brandes, U., Kenis, P. and Raab, J. (2006), “Explanation through network visualization”, Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 16‐23.

Brandes, U., Kenis, P. and Wagner, D. (2003), “Communicating centrality in policy network drawings”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, pp. 241‐53, available at: www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2003.10003.

Brint, S. (2001), “Gemeinschaft revisited: a critique and reconstruction of the community concept”, Sociological Theory, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1‐23.

Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities‐of‐practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation”, Organizational Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 40‐57.

Cadima, R., Ferreira, C., Monguet, J., Ojeda, J. and Fernandez, J. (2010), “Promoting social network awareness: a social network monitoring system”, Computers & Education, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 1233‐40.

Charmaz, K. (2003), “Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis”, in Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F. (Eds), Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 311‐30.

Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B.D. and Ingraffea, A. (2007), “Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community”, Computers and Education, Vol. 49, pp. 309‐29.

Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996), Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Coleman, J.S. (1988), “Social capital in the creation of human capital”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, pp. 95‐120.

Cress, U., Barquero, B., Buder, J. and Hesse, F.W. (2005), “Social dilemma in knowledge communication via shared databases”, Barriers and Biases in Computer‐mediated Knowledge Communication, pp. 143‐67.

Dourish, P. (2004), “What we talk about when we talk about context”, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, pp. 19‐30.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532‐50.

Elliott, M. and Scacchi, W. (2008), “Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 4‐33.

Gersick, C. (1988), “Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 9‐41.

Gersick, C. (1989), “Marking time: predictable transitions in task groups”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 274‐309.

Gloor, P. (2005), Swarm Creativity, COIN, MIT Press, Boston, MA.

Goggins, S. and Erdelez, S. (2010), “Collaborative information behavior in completely online groups”, in Foster, J. (Ed.), Collaborative Information Behavior: User Engagement and Communication Sharing, ISI Global, Hershey, PA.

Goggins, S., Galyen, K. and Laffey, J. (2010a), “Network analysis of trace data for the support of group work: activity patterns in a completely online course”, Proceedings from ACM Group 2010, Sanibel Island, FL.

Goggins, S.P., Laffey, J., Amelung, C. and Gallagher, M. (2010b), “Social intelligence in completely online groups”, Proceedings from IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, Minneapolis, MN.

Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1992), “Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 69‐94.

Hughes, M. and Daykin, N. (2002), “Towards constructivism: investigating students' perceptions and learning as a result of using an online environment”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 217‐24.

Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Johnson, S.D., Suriya, C., Yoon, S.W., Berrett, J.V. and Jason, L. (2002), “Team development and group process of virtual learning teams”, Computers and Education, Vol. 39, pp. 379‐93.

Kiesler, S., Boh, W.F., Ren, Y. and Weisband, S. (2005), “Virtual teams and the geographically dispersed professional organization”, Proceedings from Extending the Contributions of Professor Rob Kling to the Analysis of Computerization Movements.

Kittur, A. and Kraut, R. (2008), “Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: quality through coordination”, Proceedings from CSCW 2008, San Diego, CA.

Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A. and Chi, E.H. (2007), “He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia”, Proceedings from CHI 2007, San Jose, CA.

Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., Pendelton, B.A., Suh, B. and Mytkowicz, T. (2007), “Power of the few vs wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems”, Proceedings from CHI 2007, San Jose, CA.

Kling, R. and Courtright, C. (2003), “Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: a sociotechnical approach”, The Information Society, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 221‐35.

Kling, R. and Courtright, C. (2004), “Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: a sociotechnical approach”, in Barab, S., Kling, R. and Gray, J.H. (Eds), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 91‐119.

Laffey, J. and Group, S.C.R. (2005), “Understanding computer mediated social experience: implications for CSCL”, Proceedings from Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, 2005, Taipei, Taiwan.

Laffey, J., Lin, G.Y. and Lin, Y. (2006), “Assessing social ability in online learning environments”, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 163‐77.

Lamb, R., King, J.L. and Kling, R. (2003), “Informational environments: organizational contexts of online information use”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 97‐114.

Lave, J. and Wegner, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D. and Van Alstyne, M. (2009), “Social science, computational social science”, Science, Vol. 323 No. 5915, pp. 721‐3.

McGrath, J.E. (1984), Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, available at: http://users.ece.utexas.edu/∼perry/education/382v‐s08/papers/mcgrath84.pdf.

McGrath, J.E. (1991), “Time, interaction and performance (TIP)”, Small Group Research, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 147‐74.

McGrath, J.E. and Hollingshead, A.B. (1993), Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

McGrath, J.E., Arrow, H. and Berdahl, J.L. (2000), “The study of groups: past, present, and future”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 95‐105.

Michinov, E. and Michinov, N. (2007), “Identifying a transition period at the midpoint of an online collaborative activity: a study among adult learners”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 1355‐71.

Michinov, N. and Michinov, E. (2008), “Face‐to‐face contact at the midpoint of an online collaboration: ITs impact on the patterns of participation, interaction, affect and behavior over time”, Computers and Education.

Michinov, N., Michinov, E. and Toczek‐Capelle, M.‐C. (2004), “Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computer‐mediated communication”, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 8, pp. 27‐39.

Nardi, B. (2010), My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

Porter, C.E. (2004), “A typology of virtual communities: a multi‐disciplinary foundation for future research”, Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, Vol. 10 No. 1, available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/porter.html.

Powell, A., Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2004), “Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research”, The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 6‐36.

Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, T., Panciera, K., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J. (2007), “Creating, destroying and restoring value in Wikipedia”, Proceedings from Group '07, Sanibel Island, FL.

Reichardt, J. and Bornholdt, S. (2006), “Statistical mechanics of community detection”, Physical Review E, Vol. 74 No. 1, p. 16110.

Rohde, M., Reinecke, L., Pape, B. and Janneck, M. (2004), “Community‐building with web‐based systems – investigating a hybrid community of students”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 13, pp. 471‐99.

Smith, R. (2005), “Working with differences in online collaborative groups”, Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 182‐299.

Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1992), Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Stahl, G. (2006), Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge, MIT Press, Boston, MA.

Stake, R.E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Teasley, S.D., Covi, L.A., Krishnan, M.S. and Olson, J.S. (2002), “Rapid software development through team collocation”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, pp. 671‐83.

Tuckman, B.W. (1965), “Developmental sequence in small groups”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 63, pp. 384‐99.

Watson‐Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K.M. and Crowston, K. (2002), “Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 191‐209.

Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T. and delValle, D. (2004), “The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 247‐71.

Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả