Complementary use of the Ecosystem Service Concept and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Water Management

Ainscough J, de Vries Lentsch A, Metzger M, Rounsevell M, Schröter M, Delbaere B, de Groot R, Staes J (2019) Navigating pluralism: understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept. Ecosyst Serv 36:100892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.01.004 Antunes P, Karadzic V, Santos R, Beça P, Osann A (2011) Participatory multi-criteria analysis of irrigation management alternatives: the case of the Caia irrigation district, Portugal. Int J Agric Sustainability 9(2):334–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2011.582358 Baker J, Sheate WR, Phillips P, Eales R (2013) Ecosystem services in environmental assessment—help or hindrance? Environ Impact Assess Rev 40:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004 Bana e Costa CA, Da Silva PA, Correia FN (2004) Multicriteria evaluation of flood control measures: The case of Ribeira do Livramento. Water Resour Manag 18(3):263–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WARM.0000043163.19531.6a Beardmore L, Heagney E, Sullivan CA (2019) Complementary land use in the Richmond River catchment: evaluating economic and environmental benefits. Land Use Policy, 87. ARTN 104070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104070 Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer. Boston Boardman AE, Greenberg DH, Vining AR, Weimer DL (2017) Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press. UK Borsuk ME, Mavrommati G, Samal NR, Zuidema S, Wollheim W, Rogers SH, … Gardner K (2019) Deliberative multiattribute valuation of ecosystem services across a range of regional land-use, socioeconomic, and climate scenarios for the upper Merrimack River watershed, New Hampshire, USA. Ecology Soc, 24(2):11. https://doi.org/10.5751/Es-10806-240211 Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2 –3):616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 Brown TC, Bergstrom JC, Loomis JB (2007) Defining, valuing, and providing ecosystem goods and services. Nat Resour J, 47:329–376. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol47/iss2/4 Bryan BA, Grandgirard A, Ward JR (2010) Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 13(4):539–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9339-0 Bryan BA, Kandulu JM (2011) Designing a policy mix and sequence for mitigating agricultural non-point source pollution in a water supply catchment. Water Resour Manag 25(3):875–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9731-8 Canada CBD, Mariottoni CA (2016) Analysis of multicriteria in the practice of environmental services in areas of watersheds. J Sustain Forestry 35(7):500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2016.1225511 Cegan JC, Filion AM, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2017) Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review. Environ Syst Decis 37(2):123–133 Chan K, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18 Chen W, Geng Y, Zhong S, Zhuang M, Pan H (2020) A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(19):23503–23513 Choo EU, Schoner B, Wedley WC (1999) Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Computers Ind Eng 37:527–541 Comin FA, Miranda B, Sorando R, Felipe-Lucia MR, Jimenez JJ, Navarro E (2018) Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 55(3):1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13061 Cook BR, Spray CJ (2012) Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: Different paths to the same end? J Environ Manag 109:93–100 Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. nature 387(6630):253–260 Daily GC (1997) Introduction: what are ecosystem services. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press. Washington DC, USA de Jalon SG, Iglesias A, Cunningham R, Diaz JIP (2014) Building resilience to water scarcity in southern Spain: a case study of rice farming in Doana protected wetlands. Regional Environ Change 14(3):1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0569-5 Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373):270–272 Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T (2010) Rational decision making. Springer. Heidelberg, Germany Esse C, Santander-Massa R, Encina-Montoya F, De los Rios P, Fonseca D, Saavedra P (2019) Multicriteria spatial analysis applied to identifying ecosystem services in mixed-use river catchment areas in south central Chile. Forest Ecosystems, 6, ARTN 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0183-1 Finisdore J, Rhodes C, Haines-Young R, Maynard S, Wielgus J, Dvarskas A, Houdet J, Quétier F, Lamothe KA, Ding H, Soulard F, Van Houtven G, Rowcroft P (2020) The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems. Ecosyst Serv 45. ARTN 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101160 Finisdore J, Lamothe KA, Rhodes CR, Obst C, Booth P, Haines-Young R, Russell M, Houdet JR, Maynard S, Wielgus J, Rowcroft P (2021) Letter to the editor: using classification systems to integrate ecosystem services with decision making tools. Ecosyst Serv 48:101257 Fisher B, Turner RK (2008) Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biol Conserv 141(5):1167–1169 Flood S, O’Higgins TG, Lago M (2020) The promise and pitfalls of ecosystem services classification and valuation. In:O’Higgins TG, Lago M, DeWitt TH (eds.) Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, p 87–103 Garmenida E, Gamboa G (2012) Weighting social preferences in participatory multi-criteria evaluations: A case study on sustainable natural resources management. Ecol Econ 84:110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.004 Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69(6):1209–1218 Greco S, Figueira J, Ehrgott M (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis. state of the art surveys. Springer, New York, NY Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, USA Grizzetti B, Lanzanova D, Liquete C, Reynaud A, Cardoso AC (2016) Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ Sci Policy 61:194–203 Guitouni A, Martel JM (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur J Operational Res 109(2):501–521 Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21(9):1553–1566 Hein L, Van Koppen K, De Groot RS, Van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57(2):209–228 Heink U, Jax K (2019) Going upstream—How the purpose of a conceptual framework for ecosystem services determines its structure. Ecol Econ 156:264–271 Hobbs BF, Horn GT (1997) Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy policy 25(3):357–375 Hoenke KM, Kumar M, Batt L (2014) A GIS based approach for prioritizing dams for potential removal. Ecol Eng 64:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.009 Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3578–3594 Huang L, Yin YY, Du DB (2015) Testing a participatory integrated assessment (PIA) approach to select climate change adaptation actions to enhance wetland sustainability: The case of Poyang Lake region in China. Adv Clim Change Res 6(2):141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2015.09.011 Janssen R, Van Herwijnen M (2006) A toolbox for multicriteria decision-making. Int J Environ Technol Manag 6(1–2):20–39 Johnston R, Cools J, Liersch S, Morardet S, Murgue C, Mahieu M, Uyttendaele GP (2013) WETwin: a structured approach to evaluating wetland management options in data-poor contexts. Environ Sci Policy 34:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.006 Karjalainen TP, Marttunen M, Sarkki S, Rytkonen AM (2013a) Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: an analytic-deliberative approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 40:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001 Karjalainen TP, Rossi PM, Ala-aho P, Eskelinen R, Reinikainen K, Klove B, Yang H (2013b) A decision analysis framework for stakeholder involvement and learning in groundwater management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(12):5141–5153. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5141-2013 Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking. a path to creative decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K Keisler J, Linkov I (2014) Environment models and decisions. Environ Syst Decis 34(3):369–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9515-4 Kenter JO, Bryce R, Christie M, Cooper N, Hockley N, Irvine KN, Fazey I, O’Brien L, Orchard-Webb J, Ravenscroft N, Raymond CM, Reed MS, Tetta P, Watson V (2016) Shared values and deliberative valuation: future directions. Ecosyst Serv 21:358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006 Keune H, Dendoncker N (2013) Negotiated complexity in ecosystem services science and policy making - Ecosystem Services. In: Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Keune H (eds.) Ecosystem Services – Global Issues Local Practices. Elsevier, New York, NY, p 167–180 Kuller M, Bach PM, Roberts S, Browne D, Deletic A (2019) A planning-support tool for spatial suitability assessment of green urban stormwater infrastructure. Sci Total Environ 686:856–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.051 Langemeyer J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D, Scheuer S, Elmqvist T (2016) Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environ Sci Policy 62:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013 Liu S, Crossman ND, Nolan M, Ghirmay H (2013) Bringing ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. J Environ Manag 129:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.047 Liquete C, Udias A, Conte G, Grizzetti B, Masi F (2016) Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosyst Serv 22:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011 Marttunen M, Mustajoki J, Dufva M, Karjalainen TP (2015) How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach. EURO J Decis Process 3(1-2):187–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0016-3 Marttunen M, Belton V, Lienert J (2018) Are objectives hierarchy related biases observed in practice? A meta-analysis of environmental and energy applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Eur J Operational Res 265(1):178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.038 Mavrommati G, Borsuk M. E, Howarth R. B (2017) A novel deliberative multicriteria evaluation approach to ecosystem service valuation. Ecology Soc 22(2):39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09105-220239 Maydana G, Romagnoli M, Cunha M, Portapila M (2020) Integrated valuation of alternative land use scenarios in the agricultural ecosystem of a watershed with limited available data, in the Pampas region of Argentina. Sci Total Environ 714:136430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019 McInnes R, Smith G, Greaves J, Watson D, Wood N, Everard M (2016) Multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of water quality improvement and ecosystem service provision. Water Environ J 30(3–4):298–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12195 MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 160 Miller KA, Belton V (2014) Water resource management and climate change adaptation: a holistic and multiple criteria perspective. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 19(3):289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9537-0 Montibeller G, von Winterfeldt D (2015) Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Anal 35(7):1230–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12360 Mustajoki J, Marttunen M (2017) Comparison of multi-criteria decision analytical software for supporting environmental planning processes. Environ Model Softw 93:78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.026 Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Belton V, Hjerppe T, Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Belton V, Hjerppe T, Marttunen M (2020) Utilizing ecosystem service classifications in multi-criteria decision analysis–Experiences of peat extraction case in Finland. Ecosyst Serv 41:101049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101049 Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Fennessy MS, Landers DH (2012) Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecol Econ 77:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001 Newcomer-Johnson T, Andrews F, Corona J, DeWitt T, Harwell M, Rhodes C, Ringold P, Russell M, Sinha P, Van Houtven G (2020) National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS Plus). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-20/267 Odgaard MV, Turner KG, Bocher PK, Svenning JC, Dalgaard T (2017) A multi-criteria, ecosystem-service value method used to assess catchment suitability for potential wetland reconstruction in Denmark. Ecol Indic 77:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.001 Pendleton L, Mongruel R, Beaumont N, Hooper T, Charles M (2015) A triage approach to improve the relevance of marine ecosystem services assessments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 530:183–193 Primmer E, Saarikoski H, Vatn A (2018) An empirical analysis of institutional demand for valuation knowledge. Ecol Econ 152:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.017 Proctor W, Drechsler M (2006) Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 24:169–190. https://doi.org/10.1068/c22s Raymond C, Kenter J, Plieninger T, Turner N, Alexander K (2014) Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 107:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033 Roy SG, Uchida E, de Souza SP, Blachly B, Fox E, Gardner K, … Hart D (2018) A multiscale approach to balance trade-offs among dam infrastructure, river restoration, and cost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(47):12069–12074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807437115 Saarikoski H, Mustajoki J (2021) Valuation through deliberation-Citizens’ panels on peatland ecosystem services in Finland. Ecol Econ 183:106955 Saarikoski H, Mustajoki J, Barton DN, Geneletti D, Langemeyer J, Gomez-Baggethun E, Marttunen M, Antunes P, Keune H, Santos R (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis: comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 22:238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014 Saarikoski H, Mustajoki J, Hjerppe T, Aapala K (2019) Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis in valuing peatland ecosystem services-Trade-offs related to peat extraction vs. pristine peatlands in Southern Finland. Ecol Econ 162:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.010 Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY Stirling A (2006) Analysis, participation and power. Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 23:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010 TEEB (2008) The Economics of Ecosystem and Biodiversity (TEEB). http://www.teebweb.org Torres AV, Tiwari C, Atkinson SF (2021) Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners. Ecosyst Serv 49:101267 Turner RK, Morse‐Jones S, Fisher B (2010) Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185(1):79–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05280.x von Haaren C, Albert C (2011) Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manag 7(3):150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.616534 von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Weistroffer HR, Smith CH, Narula SC (2005) Multiple criteria decision support software. In Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Springer, New York, NY, p 989–1009 Zhu JF, Zhou Y, Wang SX, Wang LT, Wang FT, Liu WL, Guo B (2015) Multicriteria decision analysis for monitoring ecosystem service function of the Three-River Headwaters region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Environ Monitor Assess 187(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4523-5 Zopounidis C, Pardalos PM (Eds.) (2010) Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, Vol. 103