Complainants’ Views about Civilian Review of the Police: A Study of the Philippines

Agoncillo, T. (1983). The history of the Filipino people. Manila: National Book Store. Bartels, E. C., & Silverman, E. B. (2005). An exploratory study of the New York City, Civilian Complaint Review Board mediation program. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(4), 619–630. Barton, P. G. (1970). Civilian review boards and the handling of complaints against the police, University of Toronto Law Journal, 20, 448–468. Beral, H & Sisk, M. (1964). The administration of complaints by civilians against the police. Harvard Law Review, 77, 499–518. Brown, D. (1987). The Police complaints procedure: A survey of complainants views. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Brown, D. (1988). The police complaints procedure: A consumer’s view. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(3), 161–171. Brandl, S. G., Frank, J., Worden, R. E., & Bynum, T. S. (1994). Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship. Justice Quarterly, 11(1), 119–134. Crump, G., & Robertson, I. (1994). Complaints against the police: Speeding up the investigation process. Police Research Award Scheme. London, UK: Home Office Police Research Group. De Angelis, J. & Kupchick, A. (2007). Citizen oversight, procedural justice, and officer perceptions of the complaint investigation process. Policing: An International Journal of Police Science & Management, 30(4), 651–671. de Guzman, M. (2001). Integrity, legitimacy, efficiency, and impact: Do all these matter in the civilian review of the police. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Cincinnati, OH. European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (2000). Report to the government on the visit to the United Kingdom and the Isle of Man carried out by the CPT from 8–17 September 1997. CPT Information. Fyfe, J. J. (1985). Reviewing citizens’ complaints against police. In J. J. Fyfe (Ed.) Police Management Today: Issues and Case Studies pp. 77–87. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association. Gellhorn, W. (1966a). When Americans complain: Governmental grievance procedures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gellhorn, W. (1966b) Police review boards: Hoax or hope. Columbia University Forum. 5–10. Goldsmith, A. J. (1991). External review and self-regulation: Police accountability and the dialectic of complaint procedures. In Goldsmith (Ed.) Complaints against the police: Trends to external review pp. 13–62. New York: Oxford University Press. Green, M. (1999). Investigation of the New York Police Department’s response to civilian complaints of police misconduct: Interim report. New York, NY: Office of the New York City Public Advocate and Accountability Project. Gutang, R. (1993). Pulisya. Manila: Rex Bookstore. Halpern, S. C. (1974). Police employee organizations and accountability procedures in three cities: Some reflections on police policy-making. Law and Society Review, 8(4), 561–582. Hartford Institute of Criminal and Social Justice (1980). Civilian review of the police: The experiences of American cities. Hartford, CT: The Hartford Institute of Criminal and Social Justice, Inc. Home Office (2000). Complaints against the police: A consultation paper. London: The Stationery Office. Hudson, J.R. (1972).Organizational aspects of internal and external review of the police. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 63(3), 427–433. Human Rights Watch (2007). Shielded from justice: Police brutality and accountability in the United States. http://www.hrw.org/reports98/police/uspo/1015htm, pp. 1–7. International Advisory Commission of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (2005). Police accountability: Too important to neglect, too urgent to delay. New Delhi, India: Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. Iris, M. (1998). Police discipline in Chicago: Arbitration or arbitrary? Police Quarterly, 89(1), 215–244. Jolin, A. I., & Gibbons, D. C. (1984). Policing the police: The Portland experience. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(3), 315–322. Kahn, R. (1973). Police accountability in New York City: 1950–1970. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, IL. Kerstetter, W. A. (1985a). Who disciplines the police? Who should? In Geller (Ed.) Police leadership in America: Crisis and opportunity pp. 149–182. Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation and Praeger. Kerstetter, W. A. (1985b) Controlling the police—The art of the possible: A rejoinder to Napper, Pomeroy, and Schwartz. In Geller (Ed.) Police leadership in America: Crisis and opportunity pp. 196–198. Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation and Praeger. Knoohuizen, R. (1973). Chicago Police Board. Chicago, IL: Chicago Law Enforcement Study Group. Knoohuizen, R. (1974). Question of police discipline in Chicago: An analysis of the proposed Office of Professional Standards. Chicago, IL: Chicago Law Enforcement Study Group. Landau, T. (1994). Public complaints against the police: A view from complainants. Toronto, Canada: Centre of Criminology University of Toronto. Landau, T. (1996). When police investigate police: A view from complainants, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38(3), 219–315. Law Enforcement News (1992). Public Solidly favors mixed police/civilian review boards, Law Enforcement News, p. 1, October 31. Lenzi, M. A. (1974). Reviewing civilian complaints of police misconduct: Some answers and more questions. Temple Law Quarterly, 48(1), 89–125. Letman, S. T. (1980). Chicago’s answer to police brutality: The Office of Professional Standards. Police Chief, 1, 16–17. Letman, S. T. (1981). The Office of Professional Standards: Six years later. Police Chief, 44–46, (March). Lohman, J. D., & Misner, G. E. (1973). Civilian review-Philadelphia. In L. Ruchelman (Ed.) Who rules the police? pp. 46–73. NY: New York University Press. Loveday, B. (1988). Police complaints in the USA. Policing, 4(3), 172–193, Autumn. Luna, E., & Walker, S. (2000). Institutional structure vs. political will: Albuquerque as a case study in the effectiveness of the civilian oversight of the police. In A. Goldsmith & C. Lewis (Eds.), Civilian oversight of policing: Governance, democracy, and human rights (pp. 83–104). New York: Hart Publishing. MacPherson (1999). The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. London: Stationery Office. Maguire, M. (1990). Complaints against the police: The British experience. In Goldsmith (Ed.), Complaints against the police: The trend to external review (pp. 177–210). New York: Oxford University Press. Maguire, M., & Corbett, C. (1991). A study of police complaints systems. London: HMSO. Maryland Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights (1980). The Baltimore Police complaint evaluation procedure. Mehta, S. (2005). Holding the police to account: Civilian complaint agencies in the Commonwealth. Commonwealth Human Right Initiative Newsletter, 12(2), 1–4. Mehta, S. (2007). Feudal forces, democratic nations: Police accountability in Commonwealth South Asia. New Delhi, India: Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. McNamara, J. (1967). Uncertainties in police work: The relevance of police recruits’ training and background. In Bordua (Ed.) The Police: Six sociological essays. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Montana, R. (1992). Survey of civilian complaint systems. NY: New York City Police Department. More, H. W. (1992). Special topics in policing. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing. NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 910002. Neiderhoffer, A. (1968). Restraint of the force: A recurrent problem. Connecticut Law Review, 1, 288–305. New York Civil Liberties Union (1990). Police abuse: The need for civilian investigation and oversight. New York, NY: NYCLU Foundation. Office of the Complaints Commissioner (1985). Metropolitan Toronto Office of the Public Complaints Commissioner Annual Report. Toronto: OPCC. Office of the Inspector General (1997). Six-month report, January 1997. Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners. Perez, D. (1978). Police accountability: A question of balance. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Perez, D. (1992). Police review systems. MIS Report, 24(8), ICMA, August. Perez, D. (1994). Common sense about police review. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Perez, T. (2000). External governmental mechanisms of police accountability: Three investigative structures. Policing and Society, 10(1), 47–77. Prenzler, T. (2004). Stakeholder’s perspectives on police complaints and discipline: Towards a civilian control model. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(1), 85–113. Prenzler, T., & Ronken, C. (2001). Models of police oversight: A critique, Policing and Society, pp. 151–180. Reed, S. (1997). Internal Affairs. Police Review , 17 October 1997. Reiner, R. (1993). Police accountability: Principles, patterns and practices. In Reiner and Spencer (eds.) Accountable policing: Effectiveness, empowerment and equity (pp. 1–24). London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Reiner, R. (2000). The politics of the police (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Richburg, K. B. (1989). Justice in the Philippines beset by long delays. Washington Post, Sec. A: 26, June 25. Russel, G. D. (1997). The political ecology of police reform. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20(3), 567–589. Russell, K. (1976). Complaints against the police: A sociological view. Leicester: Milltak Ltd. Schwartz, A. (1985). Reaching systemic police abuses-The need for civilian investigation of misconduct: A response to Wayne Kerstteter. In Geller (Ed.), Police leadership in America: Crisis and opportunity (pp. 187–192). New York: Praeger. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Smith, G. (2003). Actions for damages against the police and the attitudes of claimants. Policing and Society, 13(4), 413–422. Smith, G.(2004). Rethinking police complaints. British Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 15–33. Stone, C. (2007). Tracing police accountability in theory and practice: From Philadelphia to Abuja and Sao Paolo. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 245–259. Stone, C., & Bobb, M. (2002). Civilian oversight of the police in democratic countries. Paper presented at the Global Meeting on Civilian Oversight of Police, Los Angeles, CA, May 5–8, 2002. Stone, C. E., & Ward, H. E. (2000). Democratic policing: A framework for action. Policing and Society, 10, 11–45. Strudwick, K. (2003). Is independence the only answer to complainants’ satisfaction of the police complaints process? A perspective from the United Kingdom. Police Practice and Research, 4(1), 35–46. Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives (1984). Report on hearings in New York City on police misconduct. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for the police. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–548. Tal, B. (2003). Civilian oversight of the police in Philadelphia: The first 50 years. http://www.ncjrs.org. Terrill, R. J. (1982). Complaint procedures: Variations on the theme of civilian participation. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10(4), 398–407. Terrill, R. J. (1991). Civilian oversight of the police complaint process in the United States: Concerns, developments, and more concerns. In Goldsmith (Ed.) Complaints against the police: The trend to external review (pp. 291–322). New York: Oxford University Press. Travis, L. F. III, & Langworthy, R. H. (2007). Police in America: A balance of forces (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Prentice Hall. Tyler, T. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30, 431–535. Uildriks, N., & van Mastrigt, H. (1991). Policing police violence. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers. Wagner, A. E., & Decker, S. H. (1993). Evaluating citizen complaints against the police. In Dunham and Alpert (eds.) Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (2nd ed.) pp. 275–291. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc. Walker, S. L. (1983). The police in America. New York: McGraw-Hill. Walker, S. L. (1998). Complaints against the police: A focus group study of citizen perceptions, goals, and expectations. Criminal Justice Review, 22(2), 207–226. Walker, S. L. (2001). Police accountability: The role of citizen oversight. Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth. Walker, S. L., & Bumphus, V. W. (1992). Effectiveness of civilian review: Observations on recent trends and new issues the civilian review of the police. American Journal of Police, 11(4), 1–16. Waters, I., & Brown, K. (2000). Police complaints and complainants’ experiences. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 617–638. West, P. (1991). Investigation and review of complaints against police officers: An overview of issues and philosophies. In T. Barker and D. L. Carter (Eds.) Police deviance (3rd ed.) pp. 373–404. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co. Wood, D., & MacAlister, D. (2005). Accountable, responsive, and independent: On the need for balance in police governance. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 7(3), 197–207. Zidar, K., & Klemencic, G (2004). Confronting a phenomenon of impunity and denial: Contemporary European trends in dealing with allegations of ill-treatment by law enforcement officials. http://www.ncjrs.org.